The Biggest Blunder in the History of American Politics
 

I've been avoiding this site since the election because I'm not really a fan of schadenfreude any more. I'm not into making fun of people that simply went all in believing the wrong people. Most of them will mature and see where they had erred. Heck, it happened to me in my mid-20's. Some people figure it out sooner, some later, and some never.

But I'm less forgiving if the Joy Rieds, Jack Smiths, etc. of the world. Some of them need to be prosecuted. But only a very few.

But the reason for this thread is this unbelieveably fantastic article. Of course, it may be because he's saying everything I've believed for the last 8 years, only he covers it a LOT better. He hits every single point. I recommend reading the whole thing. It is from my favorite text opinion site. And yes, I know you can only lead a horse to water. This is sort of an "integrity" check.

The Biggest Blunder in the History of American Politics

An important footnote: The very beginning has a hyperlink to the author's article from after the election of 2020, to which he sometimes refers. It's a hum-dinger as well. ;)

This should make for some good laughs, it starts out with the "stolen" election BS lol

Get Real
"overtly stealing the 2020 election", "manufactured Covid pandemonium, "thanks entirely to mail-in ballots" ???
Do you work for Mike Lindel? I don't, nor will I buy his products.
Anyone in your family die from Covid? I had a death in my family from Covid.
Trump was the one who stated that mail in ballots were fraught with fraud, convincing his crowd to vote in person.
American Thinker? More like American Stinker.

And a more "fun" take on things from another Youtube favorite of mine:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cvwzY9riU0

This guy is deceptively good.

Not Insane is Not All There.
Conversing with him will drive you insane.

Exactly. Many believe it was stolen, and there is evidence to support that position. Lots of it. But Proof? little evidence is "proof". That is a horribly misused word. In a court of law, the search is not for "proof". It is for evidence.

And not much evidence is "proof".

Well, like I said, you can lead a horse to water...

Strong, with this one, the ad-hominem attack is. - Yoda.;)

I am glad I read the link. I was looking for a long time a word to fully describe Kamala and found it in the article. The word is vacuous.

Anyhow it is time you leave the bullshit about stolen election. It deprives any other argument you may have.

And yet again, the Insane Clown proves he's very much insane. Such a fool.