Biden Impeachment Inquiry
 

I watched or listened to most of today's hearing. What a fucking joke. All 4 expert witnesses admitted that they had not seen any evidence to support the inquiry. Jamie Raskin and Dan Goldman ran absolute circles around James Comer, making him look the illiterate inbred spawn of Kentucky moonshiner.

I tried to watch a few different times during the day. The desperation from the Republicans is showing.

Even some Republicans admit Biden impeachment hearing is an ‘unmitigated disaster’
If Republicans can smear Biden as corrupt, then they can make Donald Trump, who is facing 91 criminal charges across four indictments, appear less corrupt to voters
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices...-b2420625.html

How low will these cretins stoop? Whell, how low do you think? : rolleyes:

Even the ever shameless Jonathan Turley was visibly embarrassed about being the designated attorney among the witnesses representing the GOP POV. The other 2 GOP witnesses were also clueless, partisan clowns.

Betcha' whell's media sources saw a whole different hearing. He'll be along by and by to give us their spin on it.

I suppose it depends on who he listens to. Bannon was apoplectic about Turley's admission that there's no there there. Whell can now be relied upon to wait until the GOP figures out how to spin this debacle for their faithful. Then he'll chime in with something profoundly stupid and shriek "strawman" or "logical fallacy" when we call him out for his dumbfounding credulity.

Here's an apt take this shit show inside a dumpster fire attempting to regurgitate Rudy's nonsense that got Trump impeached.

The impeachment inquiry against Biden remains an evidence-free farce put on by a party in cult-like grip to a con artist treading water in an ocean of legal jeopardy.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...s/70995287007/

Fetterman mocks GOP's impeachment inquiry by sending James Comer a case of Bud Light
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...ding-bud-light

ROFL. Perfect!

This is probably the most factual article the Examiner has ever published.

From the article:
So based on their allegations of wrongdoing, which they have no proof of, they're going in search of proof to justify their accusations. Did I get that right?

https://tse3.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.W...=Api&P=0&h=220

We'll get him with the next witness for sure...

Ohhh my! The gentlelady from Texas has something to say.


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/202...ultitime-loser

(V)iewers of Fox News on Thursday had to watch two of the network's stars pour cold water on the House GOP's impeachment inquiry. Contributor Jonathan Turley testified at the first hearing that the "current evidence" does not "support articles of impeachment" against the president. And host Neil Cavuto blasted the entire spectacle, telling his audience that he does not know "what was achieved" during the hearing. "The way this was built up — where there’s smoke there would be fire…but where there’s smoke today, we got more smoke," Cavuto said, noting "the promise of explosive testimony and proof ... did not materialize."

- Oliver Darcy, CNN