Political Forums

Political Forums (http://www.politicalchat.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.politicalchat.org/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Double standard? (http://www.politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=12944)

watsup1000 07-10-2020 10:57 AM

Double standard?
 
Joe Biden makes a few gaffes: DEMENTIA!
Trump talks nonsense almost every time he speaks, one gaffe after another: "That's just Trump".

Double standard?

Oerets 07-10-2020 11:19 AM

Sure is, will they admit to it.


No way!

Waggs098 07-11-2020 02:50 PM

Here is a double standard for ya.

https://hiphopwired.com/886527/nicho...on-hate-crime/

donquixote99 07-11-2020 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waggs098 (Post 386843)

Say why you think so?

Waggs098 07-11-2020 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donquixote99 (Post 386844)
Say why you think so?

If one person is allowed to paint on a street to voice their opinion then why isn't another person able to do the same thing? Instead they are charged with a hate crime. Really? Not like they defaced private property.

d-ray657 07-11-2020 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waggs098 (Post 386845)
If one person is allowed to paint on a street to voice their opinion then why isn't another person able to do the same thing? Instead they are charged with a hate crime. Really? Not like they defaced private property.

The missing context is whether the text that was defaced was put there by the civic authorities, or with permission or license. If so, then the painting over it was indeed vandalism.

Waggs098 07-11-2020 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-ray657 (Post 386847)
The missing context is whether the text that was defaced was put there by the civic authorities, or with permission or license. If so, then the painting over it was indeed vandalism.

If that's the case do you think it would ever fly to paint "white lives matter" or "all lives matter" on the street. Then if black people defaced it would they be charged with a hate crime?

donquixote99 07-11-2020 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-ray657 (Post 386847)
The missing context is whether the text that was defaced was put there by the civic authorities, or with permission or license. If so, then the painting over it was indeed vandalism.

There was a permit for the BLM street mural. Details in this link to the Martinez Tribune (found in Waggs' link): https://martineztribune.com/2020/07/...ed-as-vandals/

d-ray657 07-11-2020 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waggs098 (Post 386848)
If that's the case do you think it would ever fly to paint "white lives matter" or "all lives matter" on the street. Then if black people defaced it would they be charged with a hate crime?

Whether the act described in the link was a hate crime is questionable. Simply being obnoxious or racist is not a crime. As I understand hate crimes, there must be some at least implicit threat of harm because of race, and this act of vandalism might not reach that threshold. But if the BLM mural was appropriately on the street, the act described in the article is vandalism.

Do you see the painters in the article as engaged in an act of civil disobedience?

Waggs098 07-11-2020 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donquixote99 (Post 386850)
There was a permit for the BLM street mural. Details in this link to the Martinez Tribune (found in Waggs' link): https://martineztribune.com/2020/07/...ed-as-vandals/

Ok so they had a permit. I still refer you to post #7. Do you think things would happen the same way if reversed?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.