| finnbow |
04-14-2010 08:35 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657
(Post 25999)
Thank you sir. I don't know whether to feel smug or incensed. Perhaps I can feel smug toward Slow on the Uptake Limbaugh, and furious with Blankenship. I wonder what the odds are that the SOB will be looking for employment. It would be just desserts for him to be held criminally liable for cutting corners on safety, misleading OSHA inspectors or something of the like. It sounds like he has already violated the National Labor Relations Act, but the NLRB has been toothless for years. I'll bet the UAW gets cards from 80% this time, and Blankenship's ugly face will be in the campaign fliers.
|
As you may already know, both OSHA's and MSHA's enabling legislation allows for criminal prosecution for such matters (willful safety violations that result in fatalities). MSHA has a much softer approach than OSHA in this regard because of a symbiotic relationship with the mine operators and states in which they operate (and OSHA's is pretty soft). In either instance, they must refer such cases to the Justice Department who is only willing to take "slam dunk" cases associated with occupational fatalities (which also happen to have gotten lots of airplay).
Blankenship should be made the poster child for such criminal prosecutions. Due to his political connections, I'm sure we'll hear some sort of political witchhunt rhetoric from this asshole and his enablers if a prosecution goes forward.
|