Commies for Clinton
 

Hillary receives an endorsement from Communist Party USA.

http://peoplesworld.org/landslide-in-november/

I'm sure she's proud of this.

I see nothing in this article you linked to that indicates that the Communist Party has endorsed Clinton.

If you can provide me with documentation that they have I will certainly reconsider, and possibly withdraw my opposition to her.

This great news for Hillary and it will mean that finally all of Bernie's supporters will go both feet in for Hillary, start singing praises of Hillary, dancing in the streets and all that good stuff. Now I am beginning to feel sorry for poor Donald, the GOP is crying in their soup.

I still don't see the "endorsement":confused:

But whatever. I'm a So************************t, not a communist.

There you go, spreading lies again. There is no endorsement in that article beyond a mention of Bernie's.

The word Communist doesn't even appear in the article, and the only mention of endorsement is Bernie endorsing Hillary. Is your post intended to deflect from the fact that the KKK, the American Nazi Party and David Duke have endorsed Trump?

Peoples World is an "organ" of the Communist party USA but, otherwise, it's just whell up to his old tricks.

You guys seem a bit slow today. Let me help you out.

http://peoplesworld.org/about-us

People's World and Mundo Popular are known for partisan coverage. We take sides. Yours. The editorial mission is partisan to the working class, people of color, women, young people, seniors, LGBT community, to international solidarity; to popularize the ideas of Marxism and Bill of Rights so************************m. The websites enjoy a special relationship with the Communist Party USA, founded in 1919, and publish its news and views.

So, the Communist Party view on Clinton's candidacy, from the article, is this:

The union movement, communities of color, students, women, progressives and the newborn "political revolution" can help generate voter enthusiasm by talking and tweeting about Clinton and the issues. Challenging sexism is a must as well as racism, which has been a coded (and overt) staple of presidential elections for decades.

They want folks out there - boots on the ground - advocating for Hillary.

However, there are many weeks until Election Day. "Clinton could easily lose to Trump, and she could also easily end up winning in a landslide," Silver writes.

"Winning in a landslide" is needed now more than ever, and that landslide for Clinton could swing control of the Senate to Democrats, and other potential positive effects could be felt on the "down ballot" congressional and state races.

They want Hillary to win "in a landslide". If that's not an endorsement, I don't know what is.

Purposefully obtuse again? Bravo.

The article is clearly an endorsement of Hillary by People's World.