![]() |
Netanyahu speech: an attempt to draw attention from increasing inequality.
According to Krugman, the real purpose of Natanyahu's congress speech was to
deflect the Israeli electorate attention from the growing inequality in the country. Krugman indicates that the Israeli departure from kibbutz imagery really began after privatization when a clique got control of certain heights of the economy. This is a new insight for me. Like in Russia, Ukraine and ex soviet satellites privatization was an oppurtunity for the smart and well connected to grab national assets for peanuts and then form and reinforce an exclusive club...oligarchic. A George Soros inspiration. :D I did not realize that Israel, although not an ex soviet, was part of the privatization set. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/16/op...pgtype=article |
I'm hoping Bibi has a Mitt-moment tomorrow. ;)
|
What a schmuck...http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...y.html?hpid=z1
|
Because he is in a tight spot he is giving voice to his true long held intention.
Israelis of whatever political stripe understand that no US government will push hard against them for their positions on settlement and Palestinian State. The Israelis and their interests have undermined and to some extent intimidate US governments. We have become the client state. Thanks to Netanyahu more people can discern the real nature of Israeli/US relationship. |
Quote:
PRECISELY. |
Uh Zeke your bias is showing (and so is Don's), there was and is fault on both sides. History shows who started it, but tit for tat rarely works in the long run.
|
How am I biased?
My posts essentially deal with the powerful nature of the Israeli lobby and Netanyahu use of such a lobby. |
Oops, sorry Don I see that Zeke posted the link not you after quoting your post, which is sort of nasty. Eyesight is not what it used to be.
|
Quote:
|
Any election news from Tel Aviv yet?
|
|
Quote:
Maybe we'll see some results soon. It's later there than it is here. |
Bibi could still be the next PM even if he loses. For example, Likud didn't win the 2009 elections after Ehud Olmert's resignation, but Netanyahu was still able to cobble together a ruling coalition.
Per Wiki, here's the procedure for who gets to be PM: After official results are published, the President delegates the task of forming a government to the member of Knesset with the best chance of assembling a majority coalition (usually the leader of the largest party, but not required). That member has up to 42 days to negotiate with the different parties, and then present his or her government to the Knesset for a vote of confidence. Once the government is approved (by a vote of at least 61 members), he or she becomes Prime Minister. FWIW, the current President, Reuven Rivlin belongs to Likud. |
Quote:
Poor Bibi, it's still a little early but I'm calling it Bibi's boo boo for playing the race card. ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
coalition. One of his major concern is the high price of basics in Israel. |
Quote:
|
Netanyahu from today:
Quote:
|
Too close to call at this point but Likud is supposedly up by one seat.
|
Looks like it's going to be Evil triumphing over good on this one. :(
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/18/wo...rzog.html?_r=0 |
A sad day for Israel.
|
Looks like playing the race card worked. Bibi seems to have about 30 seats and Herzog/Livni around 24.
John |
|
Quote:
In other words, we knew the Israelis had been spying on them. We need to place conditions on our aid to Israel, particularly as concerns progress toward a two-state solution, maybe even to acknowledging that they have nukes and signing he NNPT. John |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.