DMV says take off the make up
 

Around here, you are not allowed to smile for your driver's license picture. It relates to the government's use (or prospective use) of face recognition software.

Maybe the SC DMV should just send Chase Culpepper up to Minnesota for some repair work by Marcus Bachmann.

My wife puts her makeup on while she drives. :eek::mad: I can't believe she hasn't wrecked yet.

Here in CA we call it multitasking. :)
Maybe you should be getting her a Google car. :D

In my neck of the woods, we call it stupid.

That sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen.

Friend of a friend was struck on his bike by an unapologetic woman applying makeup and was permanently maimed/disabled.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Good idea. That would free up her knees for texting. :rolleyes:

When she kills somebody it won't be so funny as some of the members hereabouts seem to think it is, eh barbara? Then in addition to stupid...we can call it a felony. And we can call her a killer.

I understand, but if anyone takes their eyes off the road for one second they are killers?

Pete

Driving is a privilege & if that kid doesn't want to take off his makeup, than he doesn't drive...period! WTF, this isn't some civil rights issue.
Screw him.

That's right, DJ.

Dave

You first. :rolleyes:

Guy was the 19 year old concert master first violinist for the Memphis symphony orchestra.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Leave it to pete...the dark prince of oversimplification and false equivalencies.

Took me a minute...:o

Gun ownership is a priviledge and if you don't want to fill out the paperwork in triplicate then you won't have the equipment necessary to shoot a Sea Lion pup in the face just for fun...or shoot twenty 6 year olds in the head just for spite. WTF indeed.

It's a Sharia Law thing. :rolleyes:

Don't remember seeing drivers licenses in the Constitution. :confused:

I blame Bush.

Pete

Try Beano.

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...KmxV644vWbltqg

Pot comes bean flavored now? What a country :p

Pete

Bush made you confused?

That's because you don't remember seeing motorized vehicles in 18th century America. The Constitution has to grow up, just like everything and everybody else. Well...OK...almost everybody else. But that you're confused is not particularly shocking to anybody hereabouts.

Yes. Conservative, or liberal? Only his mother knows for sure :D

Pete

His mother knows everything for sure. And she'll kick you in the balls if you don't think so.

I meant the make up...:rolleyes:

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/i...tU2NNCqBs3YR1Y

On that we agree :D

Pete

Actually, it's straw-man argumentation--suggesting you meant something stupid, instead of what you clearly did mean.

Pete just goofs around here, he doesn't actually do substantial argument much.

Potentially, yes. What? Are you going to go on some, "I have a constitutional right to not pay attention as I drive!", campaign?

No, I wouldn't support making driving a motor vehicle a "right". That would be almost as stupid a mistake as making gun ownership a "right" has been.:rolleyes:

Dave

It's too easy. I stop in after a day or so and whatever the problem of the day, it's totally the rights' fault - regardless of what the problem is or who is responsible.

And I'M oversimplifying? What substantial arguments are you talking about?

Pete

In this case, the proposition, I believe, can be stated as 'a person who drives inattentively because they are trying to carefully put makeup on their face a killer, if they hit and kill someone.'

For some motivation that I have to believe was based on cranky disrespect for the other poster, you then said "so everyone who takes their eyes off the road for one second is a killer?"

I suggest shit like that is grounds for cranky disrespect of you, ol' bean. :)

Complete BS, but at least you're consistent with your incoherent rants about nothing. :rolleyes:

DQ yeah :o But I will say *most* people do things that detract from their ability to drive their best - jail?

Pete

Only when it rises to the level of willful negligence, with felony time for death or serious bodily harm resulting. Which I think is more or less what the statutes say.

It's a pretty decent strategy actually...if the object is to be pals with everybody. Not a goal of mine...ya think?