![]() |
Have you seen this?
|
I watched the first 5 minutes. In summary, I have no faith in economic prognosticators, particularly those who reside on cable TV. They may be right, but even a blind squirrel sometimes finds a nut.
|
Quote:
Wow, really? *Yes, I know who many of them are but, except for the Swiss economist Marc Faber, none was identified. This guys' been around for a while predicting the imminent collapse of our economy. He's a bit too alarmist for my taste but he did say this which I like: "The federal government is sending each of us a $600 rebate. If we spend that money at Wal-Mart, the money goes to China. If we spend it on gasoline it goes to the Arabs. If we buy a computer it will go to India. If we purchase fruit and vegetables it will go to Mexico, Honduras and Guatemala. If we purchase a good car it will go to Germany. If we purchase useless crap it will go to Taiwan and none of it will help the American economy. The only way to keep that money here at home is to spend it on prostitutes and beer, since these are the only products still produced in US. I've been doing my part." John |
Gold was at $550 in 1982 and the same folks were screaming the same crap.
I took it on the chin then. I have no intentions of drinking from the same well. BTW it is the same group who got fat on loose money that are now suggesting that things need to change. Why? Because their is so little room left to steal as things are now. |
Alright I have now viewed the entire "show."
BASICALLY IT'S TRASH. |
Quote:
http://www.ravibatra.com/Forecasting.html John |
Pure unadultrated horse manure.
|
Quote:
John |
Quote:
|
Anything that discusses economics and features (briefly) Ron Paul I know has to be the rough equivalent of a tea leaf reading. Paul is a decent enough fellow but he should have stuck to delivering babies, the poor fellow is so far out of his depth it is embarassing to watch.
Then the talking head who blamed the financial disaster on too much government regulation immediately said bye bye. |
Well, I didn't watch the whole thing, but I already know where it's headed.
The Federal Reserve probably is unconstitutional, but what ain't? And it wouldn't be the first time we've had a central bank, or the first time one of them has been shut down. Inflation probably has destroyed 95% of the dollars purchasing power, but the only way that anyone has been hurt by that is if they buried their currency in fruit jars. Gold is a commodity, and it appears to me that it is way oversold at the moment. For one, there isn't that much gold, people are buying paper gold. And the price will most likely collapse once again. Probably, the basic premise of this piece (like I said I didn't watch the whole thing) is that the system is rotten to the core. And if I'm correct on my assumption, I would tend to agree. But it's the only rotten game in town. The dollar, or even gold, is backed only by the faith that it has some value. And while faith may not be one of my strong points, I only HOPE that everyone else has plenty of FAITH. If not, we're all gonna be in a world of hurt. Chas |
Jesus Christ.
Like the panel discussion I watched on Fox last night.....would someone please just hand these assholes a box of razor-blades? Is the dollar declining? Yep. Should I buy gold? F**k no. The price of gold is so artificially inflated right now......... The only people making money in the transaction would be the people who are selling it. Probably the guys in this video. Dave |
I had about the same reaction as many of you.....but it did make me wonder a little.
Perhaps I should have asked this question instead: Are you concerned about inflation-issues given what is happening within our elected/appointed "leaders' " control? |
Yes, but I am also concerned about the devaluation of work. For the first time in years---I got no COLA increase, no bonus, and even more transfer of benefit costs to me and my fellow employees through deduction and co-pays. We're getting burned at both ends. Still, I realize I'm fortunate to still have a job. Knowing that keeps me going.
Dave |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's a terrible catch 22. You need unions to insure a living wage yet if you pay a living wage you cannot keep your costs competitive. Yeah all you loud mouth folks on the right explain why this is good. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think that deflation is more of a concern at the moment. Helicopter Ben said something to the effect that deflation was not a problem, and he would drop money out of helicopters if necessary...which is precisely what they are doing. Long term, I would expect to see inflation. For one, we have a history of inflation, and for another, how else will we ever get a handle on the national debt? Not that it is meant to be paid. But what do I know? A few years ago, the "smart money" guys were saying that only a fool would pay off their house. Make the minimum payments and invest the rest of your money as you would realize bigger returns on your investments than what the interest rates on your mortgage were. Thank God I didn't listen to them. And I ain't buying paper gold either. Chas |
Quote:
In my cousins case the firm was effectively no longer competitive not because of foreign competition but because of cheaper non unionized competition. |
And in time the non-union people lose their jobs because it can be done cheaper yet in other countries. Then our politicians, at the behest of business owners and corporate executives, turn around and tell us that the only way to bring work back into this country is to be even cheaper than the foreigners. And the wing-nuts cheer because Rush has old them American workers are "Lazy and Overpaid", and they say, "See, Rush was right! We are lazy and overpaid, haha! Dittos, Rush! Fuck the American worker!"
Disregarding the fact that they are American workers themselves, of course. This is whay I always say, "Go ahead, Skippy. Be the first to work harder for less money than a Chinaman. Show us the way, Bud." When I hear this stupidity. Dave |
Quote:
By now you should realize, the rich are hard working and the poor are lazy. The working poor are teabaggers.;) |
Quote:
Oh, I know. And traced to it's root, you will find it usually comes from someone who gets tens or even hundreds of millions to sit on his/her ass in front of a microphone/camera and bitch about how bad the wealthy have it. And where do you suppose all of that money comes from and why? Who could be paying them to keep us all ashamed of ourselves for expecting a decent wage and a few bennies?:rolleyes: It's not me, that's for damned sure. Being a mechanic pays well, but certainly not enough to buy any top flight propagandists like Hannity, or Boortz, or Coulter and sure as hell not Limbaugh. Thought bubble; (Hmmmmmm? I don't think it would be the unions, they hate those guys. Environme....no, no. The governm.....nah, well maybe Republicans might kick them a few private donations or behind the scenes type deals, but that's not really the gov..... Maybe it's............Ah Hah! The people who pay the labor costs? I might just be on to something there!:eek:) :D Dave |
Can you say Murdoch?
|
Yeah, Murdoch. He would be the puppeteer, but who picked him to
run the show? Maybe this belongs in "Conspiracy theories"? Yeah. Dave |
Quote:
|
Quote:
John |
Quote:
John |
Quote:
Dave |
Quote:
I don't think that cheer leading from the media, or people just listening to what they wish to hear, is anything new. 140 years ago, John Newman Edwards managed to paint a smiley face on the "heroic exploits" of the James/Younger gang. Not exactly a bunch you'd want to invite over for fried chicken on Sunday. Unless you had a death wish. Chas |
Quote:
It's just that no one cares. Chas |
They did try to restrict ownership of media, but when Martin was head of the Funny Cookie Company he allowed Murdoch to own far too much of the media, e.g., FOX, WSJ, etc. to the point that in some places there is only one opinion presented.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.