Political Forums

Political Forums (http://www.politicalchat.org/index.php)
-   Current events (http://www.politicalchat.org/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Zimmerman trial starts today. (http://www.politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=5865)

bobabode 06-10-2013 05:23 PM

Zimmerman trial starts today.
 
I really hope that justice will be done in this case.

barbara 06-10-2013 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobabode (Post 160588)
I really hope that justice will be done in this case.

I agree!

BlueStreak 06-10-2013 05:59 PM

Let the circus resume.

I'm hoping the whole escapade has a chilling effect on the SYG laws in the courts. If we can't get rid of the law, we can press the shooters harder to prove the validity of their actions.

Dave

barbara 06-10-2013 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueStreak (Post 160598)
Let the circus resume.

I'm hoping the whole escapade has a chilling effect on the SYG laws in the courts. If we can't get rid of the law, we can press the shooters harder to prove the validity of their actions.

Dave

Again, I agree.

Oerets 06-10-2013 06:37 PM

I will be surprised if any real justice is delivered in a verdict. See a slap on the wrist or a walk. Now if there is a civil case for liability then maybe.

Barney

whell 06-10-2013 07:07 PM

How do you define "justice" in this case?

bobabode 06-10-2013 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 160610)
How do you define "justice" in this case?

Go buy a dictionary.

Rex E. 06-10-2013 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 160610)
How do you define "justice" in this case?

Wouldn't you say it would be the guy that stalked, shot and killed a young man pays for his crime?

Oerets 06-11-2013 07:57 AM

For me he would need to be found guilty and do serious jail time. You can't take the law into your own hands and cause a altercation ending in death without consequences.

But I fear the prosecution will be outclassed by the defense team. Will be playing catchup throughout the trial.



Barney

whell 06-11-2013 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobabode (Post 160612)
Go buy a dictionary.

Go buy a clue.

finnbow 06-11-2013 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 160610)
How do you define "justice" in this case?

A unanimous verdict by a jury of his peers.

whell 06-11-2013 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rex E. (Post 160619)
Wouldn't you say it would be the guy that stalked, shot and killed a young man pays for his crime?

Assuming that our method of jurisprudence is to try the case in the media. Frankly, there's been an overindulgence of racism, emotionalism and politics in this case stoked by a voracious, 24/7 cable news cesspool that will, hopefully, not be present in the courtroom.

The jury will hear the facts in the case as presented by the prosecution and defense. There will be a judge which will instruct the jury to render a verdict within the confines of Florida law. I don't have a dog in this race one way or another, but the circus that has surrounded this case has been sickening.

whell 06-11-2013 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by finnbow (Post 160647)
A unanimous verdict by a jury of his peers.

We have a winner.

finnbow 06-11-2013 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 160648)
Assuming that our method of jurisprudence is to try the case in the media. Frankly, there's been an overindulgence of racism, emotionalism and politics in this case stoked by a voracious, 24/7 cable news cesspool that will, hopefully, not be present in the courtroom.

The media is interested in a story, not in justice. It seems that they always have to have some sort of murder case to harp on incessantly. For a change, this one doesn't involve an attractive white girl who has murdered or been murdered (Jon Benet Ramsey, Natalie Holloway, Jody Arias, Amanda Knox ....) and does touch on issues of broader social import (Stand Your Ground, racial profiling, over-reliance of firearms for personal security). However, it still remains a local story IMHO, and coverage should be limited to central Florida. I don't know what happened that night in Sanford and really don't care.

piece-itpete 06-11-2013 10:00 AM

Good, Zimmermans' back. We needed to argue something with no facts :p

Pete

MikeG22 06-11-2013 12:12 PM

It's kinda warm here for the hoodies to come back out.

BlueStreak 06-11-2013 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 160648)
"................. voracious, 24/7 cable news cesspool that will, hopefully, not be present in the courtroom."

It frightens me that there are people pushing to change that. At what point does the public and the press not have any right to participate in the process? Methinks the founders fear of "Mobocracy" is coming to fruition.

Dave

merrylander 06-11-2013 01:45 PM

HLN will have their "legal experts" decide the outcome long before the judge gives it to the jury.

bobabode 06-11-2013 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 160649)
We have a winner.

No shit, Sherlock. That's what I meant by go buy a dictionary, Mike.
That said, from the information that this lying scumbag has offered with his own mouth and the police telling him to cease and desist from stalking the dead kid. He's guilty of a charge ranging from aggravated assault to 2nd degree murder. The jury will decide which it is to be.

Zeke 06-12-2013 01:13 AM

Bottom line?

No gun, no death.

hillbilly 06-12-2013 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke (Post 160768)
Bottom line?

No gun, no death.

In this case, true. I agree.

But not in a local case at the lake here. A man beat another man to death while a crowd stood and watched. There were no weapons of any kind used, just one pissed off man that was stronger and much meaner than the man he got pissed at.

I hope you never face that boys situation, but if you ever do then I hope you are stronger than the one who grabs hold of you. And if you aren't, then I hope somebody steps into the fight to save you because it doesn't always work out so good if they don't.

Oerets 06-12-2013 08:08 AM

For a moment consider the scenario of Zimmerman having pulled the gun first and Travon then fighting for his life! Something a kid would do without thinking. Why is it taken as fact anything Zimmerman may say now? We all must remember only one version of events can be told now.

You have a known fact the one person talking now is a wanna be cop with a gun. Last I checked vigilante justice was not legal.



Barney

piece-itpete 06-12-2013 10:21 AM

Lots of assumptions going on ;)

Pete

CarlV 06-12-2013 12:43 PM

No gun, Trayvon would still be alive.
Gunboy was told to leave him alone and wait for cops, and if he did, Trayvon would still be alive.
He did not leave him alone as the cops told him to do. He went ahead and escalated the situation from what it was at that time, otherwise Trayvon would still be alive.



No assumptions there. :)



Carl

piece-itpete 06-12-2013 01:05 PM

So Zimmerman should have been beat like a rug instead? Does that apply to cops too?

Pete

barbara 06-12-2013 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oerets (Post 160778)
For a moment consider the scenario of Zimmerman having pulled the gun first and Travon then fighting for his life! Something a kid would do without thinking. Why is it taken as fact anything Zimmerman may say now? We all must remember only one version of events can be told now.

You have a known fact the one person talking now is a wanna be cop with a gun. Last I checked vigilante justice was not legal.



Barney

Don't think most people have considered this possibility. Probably closest thing to the truth that I've heard.

barbara 06-12-2013 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlV (Post 160810)
No gun, Trayvon would still be alive.
Gunboy was told to leave him alone and wait for cops, and if he did, Trayvon would still be alive.
He did not leave him alone as the cops told him to do. He went ahead and escalated the situation from what it was at that time, otherwise Trayvon would still be alive.



No assumptions there. :)



Carl

Exactly right.
👍

bobabode 06-12-2013 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piece-itpete (Post 160802)
Lots of assumptions going on ;)

Pete

Quote:

Originally Posted by piece-itpete (Post 160813)
So Zimmerman should have been beat like a rug instead? Does that apply to cops too?

Pete

How do you know Zimmerman was beaten like a rug, were you there?

Pot, meet kettle.

piece-itpete 06-12-2013 01:36 PM

He did have damage on the back of his head, from it being slammed into the ground.

For all this, are we all prepared to stand by the results of the trial? Will there be riots if not guilty, and would they be justified?

Pete

bobabode 06-12-2013 01:55 PM

Yeh, Zimmie's head was such a mess in the cop shop video...:rolleyes: Skinny black kid beat him like a rug?

piece-itpete 06-12-2013 02:06 PM

Skill and heart mean a LOT. Going by size will possibly give a false impression. I saw a small HS wrestler take down 3 guys like magic.

Here's the thing - it appears that, by their current law, Zimmerman is off the hook. It's why they didn't take him into custody immediately. As you said, there's only one story, with no contradictory evidence (that we know about) to boot.

So do we abide the rule of law?

Btw, a cop here was talking about Castle Law (home, not street) and said the burden of proof under these laws is on the trespasser - and dead men don't tell tales.

Pete

barbara 06-12-2013 02:22 PM

Pete, I would think there might be evidence of the 911 dispatcher telling Zimmerman to stay in his vehicle and let law enforcement handle it.

piece-itpete 06-12-2013 02:26 PM

Understood, but that's not the law in case, is my understanding.

Pete

bobabode 06-12-2013 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piece-itpete (Post 160826)
Skill and heart mean a LOT. Going by size will possibly give a false impression. I saw a small HS wrestler take down 3 guys like magic.

Here's the thing - it appears that, by their current law, Zimmerman is off the hook. It's why they didn't take him into custody immediately. As you said, there's only one story, with no contradictory evidence (that we know about) to boot.

So do we abide the rule of law?

Btw, a cop here was talking about Castle Law (home, not street) and said the burden of proof under these laws is on the trespasser - and dead men don't tell tales.

Pete

1) T. Martin had no such training.
2) A SYG defense falls flat on it's face considering the police dispatcher advised Zimmerman to heel.
3) Of course, we abide the rule of law but Zimmerman disregarded #2. Is not the police dispatcher advising him not to go after the kid a lawful order?
4) Castle Law doesn't apply to this case, the kid was simply walking home from the store with Skittle's and tea. Zimmerman stalked, then confronted Martin and shot him dead. Those are the facts. All else is supposition and Zimmerman isn't a credible witness.

barbara 06-12-2013 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piece-itpete (Post 160831)
Understood, but that's not the law in case, is my understanding.

Pete

What do you mean that's not the law?

CarlV 06-12-2013 02:42 PM

Here is the text of the initial call to the Police Dept.





Quote:

Dispatcher: Sanford Police Department. ...
Zimmerman: Hey we've had some break-ins in my neighborhood, and there's a
real suspicious guy, uh, [near] Retreat View Circle, um, the best address I can
give you is 111 Retreat View Circle. This guy looks like he's up to no good, or
he's on drugs or something. It's raining and he's just walking around, looking
about.
Dispatcher: OK, and this guy is he white, black, or Hispanic?
Zimmerman: He looks black.
Dispatcher: Did you see what he was wearing?
Zimmerman: Yeah. A dark hoodie, like a grey hoodie, and either jeans or
sweatpants and white tennis shoes. He's [unintelligible], he was just staring...
Dispatcher: OK, he's just walking around the area...
Zimmerman: ...looking at all the houses.
Dispatcher: OK...
Zimmerman: Now he's just staring at me.
Dispatcher: OK—you said it's 1111 Retreat View? Or 111?
Zimmerman: That's the clubhouse...
Dispatcher: That's the clubhouse, do you know what the—he's near the
clubhouse right now?
Zimmerman: Yeah, now he's coming towards me.
Dispatcher: OK.
Zimmerman: He's got his hand in his waistband. And he's a black male.
Z
Dispatcher: How old would you say he looks?
Zimmerman: He's got button on his shirt, late teens.
Dispatcher: Late teens ok.


.................................................. ............


Zimmerman: Somethings wrong with him. Yup, he's coming to check me out, he's got
something in his hands, I don't know what his deal is.
Dispatcher: Just let me know if he does anything ok
Zimmerman: How long until you get an officer over here?
Dispatcher: Yeah we've got someone on the way, just let me know if this guy does
anything else.
Zimmerman: Okay. These assholes they always get away. When you come to the
clubhouse you come straight in and make a left. Actually you would go past the
clubhouse.
Dispatcher: So it's on the lefthand side from the clubhouse?
Zimmerman: No you go in straight through the entrance and then you make a left...uh
you go straight in, don't turn, and make a left. Shit he's running.
Dispatcher: He's running? Which way is he running?
Zimmerman: Down towards the other entrance to the neighborhood.
Dispatcher: Which entrance is that that he's heading towards?
Zimmerman: The back entrance...fucking [unintelligible]
Dispatcher: Are you following him?
Zimmerman: Yeah
Dispatcher: Ok, we don't need you to do that.
Zimmerman: Ok
Dispatcher: Alright sir what is your name?
Zimmerman: George...He ran.
Dispatcher: Alright George what's your last name?
Zimmerman: Zimmerman
Dispatcher: And George what's the phone number you're calling from?


.................................................. ...............




Zimmerman: [redacted by
Mother Jones
]
Dispatcher: Alright George we do have them on the way, do you want to meet with the
officer when they get out there?
Zimmerman: Alright, where you going to meet with them at?
Zimmerman: If they come in through the gate, tell them to go straight past the
club house, and uh, straight past the club house and make a left, and then they
go past the mailboxes, that’s my truck...[unintelligible]
Dispatcher: What address are you parked in front of?
Zimmerman: I don’t know, it’s a cut through so I don’t know the address.
Dispatcher: Okay do you live in the area?
Zimmerman: Yeah, I...[unintelligible]
Dispatcher: What’s your apartment number?
Zimmerman: It’s a home it’s 1950, oh crap I don’t want to give it all out, I don’t
know where this kid is.
Dispatcher: Okay do you want to just meet with them right near the mailboxes
then?
Zimmerman: Yeah that’s fine.
Dispatcher: Alright George, I’ll let them know to meet you around there okay?
Zimmerman: Actually could you have them call me and I’ll tell them where I’m at?
Dispatcher: Okay, yeah that’s no problem.
Zimmerman: Should I give you my number or you got it?
Dispatcher: Yeah I got it [redacted by
Mother Jones]
Zimmerman: Yeah you got it.
Dispatcher: Okay no problem, I’ll let them know to call you when you’re in the
area.
http://s3.documentcloud.org/document...-zimmerman.pdf

piece-itpete 06-12-2013 02:48 PM

The streets are a tough training ground.

SYG falls flat because the cops told him to forget it? Tell me how that works. He was part of a neighborhood watch. Where's the cops then?

Anyway I suppose we'll find out by and by.

Pete

barbara 06-12-2013 02:50 PM

Carl, thanks for that 911 report.

What stands out to me is that Zimmerman had already made up his mind this kid was trouble with no evidence except the kid's age, hoodie, and skin color.

It isn't a crime to walk through a neighborhood looking around.... Even in bad weather.

Why didn't Zimmerman wait for law enforcement to show up?

barbara 06-12-2013 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piece-itpete (Post 160838)
The streets are a tough training ground.

SYG falls flat because the cops told him to forget it? Tell me how that works. He was part of a neighborhood watch. Where's the cops then?

Anyway I suppose we'll find out by and by.

Pete

Pete, I remember reading that Zimmerman wasn't actually a part of any legitimate Neighborhood Watch Group. And, even if he was, those watch groups have strict rules about simply reporting suspicious behavior and then letting law enforcement handle it.

CarlV 06-12-2013 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barbara (Post 160839)
Carl, thanks for that 911 report.

What stands out to me is that Zimmerman had already made up his mind this kid was trouble with no evidence except the kid's age, hoodie, and skin color.

It isn't a crime to walk through a neighborhood looking around.... Even in bad weather.

Why didn't Zimmerman wait for law enforcement to show up?

That is what I get from the transcript too.


Carl


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.