Political Forums

Political Forums (http://www.politicalchat.org/index.php)
-   Current events (http://www.politicalchat.org/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Airport delay's really! (http://www.politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=5689)

Oerets 04-26-2013 07:29 AM

Airport delay's really!
 
Like I give a rat a$$ if every fight is late. If that is what it takes to solve the funding of the government. Guess it is alright to cut funding everywhere else, but our elected officials hate waiting in airports. Maybe it's to avoid the little people and their questions.



Barney

merrylander 04-26-2013 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oerets (Post 155575)
Like I give a rat a$$ if every fight is late. If that is what it takes to solve the funding of the government. Guess it is alright to cut funding everywhere else, but our elected officials hate waiting in airports. Maybe it's to avoid the little people and their questions.



Barney

Yep 'cause right at the moment they are passing legislation to exempt the FAA.

Dondilion 04-26-2013 10:44 AM

Fast action when they are affected. :D

CarlV 04-26-2013 10:53 AM

It will be interesting to see how many tea baggers vote for it.


Carl

mini me 04-26-2013 12:20 PM

I see the House and Senate votes in overwhelming bi-partisan fashion to end the mean-spirited furloughs of airport employees and order the White House and the Transportation Department to get the air traffic controllers back to work. Who said that bipartisanship doesn't exist? And I guess Obama is a "uniter" after all, especially when he's screwing government employees and US air travelers. He got the House and Senate to unite and tell him where he can put his cynical manipulation of the sequestration issue.

bobabode 04-26-2013 12:38 PM

Wow, I didn't know that Faux News had a feeding tube supplied with their programming....or is that an enema tube? Meh, I guess it doesn't make any difference to a parrot.:rolleyes:

BlueStreak 04-26-2013 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mini me (Post 155653)
I see the House and Senate votes in overwhelming bi-partisan fashion to end the mean-spirited furloughs of airport employees and order the White House and the Transportation Department to get the air traffic controllers back to work. Who said that bipartisanship doesn't exist? And I guess Obama is a "uniter" after all, especially when he's screwing government employees and US air travelers. He got the House and Senate to unite and tell him where he can put his cynical manipulation of the sequestration issue.

So, now it's important to those who claim the government is "bloated" that we keep government at it's ostensibly "bloated" levels?

You wanted cuts, you got them, shut your whining hole.:p

Dave

whell 04-26-2013 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueStreak (Post 155660)
So, now it's important to those who claim the government is "bloated" that we keep government at it's ostensibly "bloated" levels?

Dave

Really? So that absolute ONLY PLACE that Obama could go to find dollars to cut spending to align to the sequester was to inconvenience travelers and screw air traffic controllers? Or families visiting the White House? Or folks wanting tours of NASA?

I guess these are programs critical to the security and stability of the United States, so Obama and company just couldn't find a way to do without them. I guess the following "bloat" was just asking too much to do without. :rolleyes:

The federal government has shelled out $3 million to researchers at the University of California at Irvine to fund their research on video games such as World of Warcraft.

The Department of Health and Human Services plans to spend $500 million on a program that will, among other things, seek to solve the problem of 5-year-old children that “can’t sit still” in a kindergarten classroom.

According to USA Today, 13 different government agencies “fund 209 different science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) education programs — and 173 of those programs overlap with at least one other program.

A total of $615,000 was given to the University of California at Santa Cruz to digitize photos, T-shirts and concert tickets belonging to the Grateful Dead.

One professor at Stanford University was given $239,100 to study how Americans use the Internet to find love.

A total of $1.8 million was spent on a “museum of neon signs” in Las Vegas, Nevada.

The federal government spends $25 billion dollars a year maintaining federal buildings that are either unused or totally vacant.


These are just a few of the many, many, many stupid spending decisions that are made with our tax dollars. But it was more important to the Prez to use the sequester to make a political statement, and screw a whole lot of folks in the process.

BlueStreak 04-26-2013 01:00 PM

You got your cuts, tightwad.

Shut the hell up.

Dave

bobabode 04-26-2013 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueStreak (Post 155670)
You got your cuts, tightwad.

Shut the hell up.

Dave

Buh- but...how are they going to starve the beast and drown it in the bathtub?:rolleyes: Notice whellie didn't mention one bit of bloat and pork going to the MIC or the myriad of pet schemes of the Repugnants.

BlueStreak 04-26-2013 01:12 PM

:p;):rolleyes:

Dave

bobabode 04-26-2013 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 155668)
Really? So that absolute ONLY PLACE that Obama could go to find dollars to cut spending to align to the sequester was to inconvenience travelers and screw air traffic controllers? Or families visiting the White House? Or folks wanting tours of NASA?

I guess these are programs critical to the security and stability of the United States, so Obama and company just couldn't find a way to do without them. I guess the following "bloat" was just asking too much to do without. :rolleyes:

The federal government has shelled out $3 million to researchers at the University of California at Irvine to fund their research on video games such as World of Warcraft.

The Department of Health and Human Services plans to spend $500 million on a program that will, among other things, seek to solve the problem of 5-year-old children that “can’t sit still” in a kindergarten classroom.

According to USA Today, 13 different government agencies “fund 209 different science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) education programs — and 173 of those programs overlap with at least one other program.

A total of $615,000 was given to the University of California at Santa Cruz to digitize photos, T-shirts and concert tickets belonging to the Grateful Dead.

One professor at Stanford University was given $239,100 to study how Americans use the Internet to find love.

A total of $1.8 million was spent on a “museum of neon signs” in Las Vegas, Nevada.

The federal government spends $25 billion dollars a year maintaining federal buildings that are either unused or totally vacant.

These are just a few of the many, many, many stupid spending decisions that are made with our tax dollars. But it was more important to the Prez to use the sequester to make a political statement, and screw a whole lot of folks in the process.

Oh, now you're a supporter of the ATC union? Gimme a break.:rolleyes:

I don't mind the Grateful Dead expenditure, tho. Why do you hate music, whellie?;)

BlueStreak 04-26-2013 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobabode (Post 155676)
Oh, now you're a supporter of the ATC union? Gimme a break.:rolleyes:

I don't mind the Grateful Dead expenditure, tho. Why do you hate music, whellie?;)

I want to see that "Museum of Neon Signs". Sounds really cool. 1.8 million for that aint bad, really. I suppose that money would have been better spent on developing new torture techniques? Or maybe they could have given it to Governor Walker so he could use it to screw more workers?

Dave

bobabode 04-26-2013 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by merrylander (Post 155621)
Yep 'cause right at the moment they are passing legislation to exempt the FAA.

I wonder how that slack will be made up? Slash Headstart some more? Medicare? Social Security?

merrylander 04-26-2013 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 155668)
Really? So that absolute ONLY PLACE that Obama could go to find dollars to cut spending to align to the sequester was to inconvenience travelers and screw air traffic controllers? Or families visiting the White House? Or folks wanting tours of NASA?

I guess these are programs critical to the security and stability of the United States, so Obama and company just couldn't find a way to do without them. I guess the following "bloat" was just asking too much to do without. :rolleyes:

The federal government has shelled out $3 million to researchers at the University of California at Irvine to fund their research on video games such as World of Warcraft.

The Department of Health and Human Services plans to spend $500 million on a program that will, among other things, seek to solve the problem of 5-year-old children that “can’t sit still” in a kindergarten classroom.

According to USA Today, 13 different government agencies “fund 209 different science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) education programs — and 173 of those programs overlap with at least one other program.

A total of $615,000 was given to the University of California at Santa Cruz to digitize photos, T-shirts and concert tickets belonging to the Grateful Dead.

One professor at Stanford University was given $239,100 to study how Americans use the Internet to find love.

A total of $1.8 million was spent on a “museum of neon signs” in Las Vegas, Nevada.

The federal government spends $25 billion dollars a year maintaining federal buildings that are either unused or totally vacant.


These are just a few of the many, many, many stupid spending decisions that are made with our tax dollars. But it was more important to the Prez to use the sequester to make a political statement, and screw a whole lot of folks in the process.

Uh Whell, civic lesson 101 - Congress does the spending not the Prez.

BlueStreak 04-26-2013 02:11 PM

For the record, no I don't support the FAA cuts. And, I hope further furloughs can be avoided/everyone can go back to work.

I just find the howling from the right over this and the Texas aid thing to be hilarious. It speaks volumes.

It really does.

Dave

barbara 04-26-2013 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 155668)
Really? So that absolute ONLY PLACE that Obama could go to find dollars to cut spending to align to the sequester was to inconvenience travelers and screw air traffic controllers? Or families visiting the White House? Or folks wanting tours of NASA?

I guess these are programs critical to the security and stability of the United States, so Obama and company just couldn't find a way to do without them. I guess the following "bloat" was just asking too much to do without. :rolleyes:

The federal government has shelled out $3 million to researchers at the University of California at Irvine to fund their research on video games such as World of Warcraft.

The Department of Health and Human Services plans to spend $500 million on a program that will, among other things, seek to solve the problem of 5-year-old children that “can’t sit still” in a kindergarten classroom.

According to USA Today, 13 different government agencies “fund 209 different science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) education programs — and 173 of those programs overlap with at least one other program.

A total of $615,000 was given to the University of California at Santa Cruz to digitize photos, T-shirts and concert tickets belonging to the Grateful Dead.

One professor at Stanford University was given $239,100 to study how Americans use the Internet to find love.

A total of $1.8 million was spent on a “museum of neon signs” in Las Vegas, Nevada.

The federal government spends $25 billion dollars a year maintaining federal buildings that are either unused or totally vacant.


These are just a few of the many, many, many stupid spending decisions that are made with our tax dollars. But it was more important to the Prez to use the sequester to make a political statement, and screw a whole lot of folks in the process.

Whell,
For each and every one of those expenditures, the gov had to have input from the public before spending the money.

How many public hearings did you attend to express your opinion on those expenditures?

bobabode 04-26-2013 02:19 PM

The irony is lost on them, as usual, Dave. Gotta love these laundry lists of tragic and unholy expenditures whilst scrupulously avoiding to mention where they cut and pasted them from.:rolleyes: I'm sure they are mendaciously posting the unfair treatment garnered here over at Blaze as we speak...;)

barbara 04-26-2013 02:24 PM

The airlines should have done the furloughs like they do for us where I work. We all still come to work every day but our furlough time is swapped for time on the books.
No loss in work productivity.

We had furloughs for quite some time and congress hasn't rushed to to find any solution.... Oh wait, where I work, we provide essential services for the needy... Not exactly a priority I guess.

BlueStreak 04-26-2013 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barbara (Post 155709)
The airlines should have done the furloughs like they do for us where I work. We all still come to work every day but our furlough time is swapped for time on the books.
No loss in work productivity.

We had furloughs for quite some time and congress hasn't rushed to to find any solution.... Oh wait, where I work, we provide essential services for the needy... Not exactly a priority I guess.

Oh, so YOU'RE the one that doles out the welfare?;)

Dave

barbara 04-26-2013 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueStreak (Post 155719)
Oh, so YOU'RE the one that doles out the welfare?;)

Dave

:) not quite, I work with funding that provides services to senior citizens.

This year I will be old enough to qualify for the services I oversee. I'm starting to take this stuff a little more seriously ;).

BlueStreak 04-26-2013 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barbara (Post 155725)
:) not quite, I work with funding that provides services to senior citizens.

This year I will be old enough to qualify for the services I oversee. I'm starting to take this stuff a little more seriously ;).

Good for you.

Of course, you do understand that some of the folks see this as "welfare" too..............Until it's them that needs it. Then, of course, it's service well deserved. Owed to them, even. Because they are such "Great Americans".:rolleyes:

Dave

barbara 04-26-2013 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueStreak (Post 155728)
Good for you.

Of course, you do understand that some of the folks see this as "welfare" too..............Until it's them that needs it. Then, of course, it's service well deserved. Owed to them, even. Because they are such "Great Americans".:rolleyes:

Dave

Yeah, I understand all too well.
When one of those people is denied a service (due to various legitimate reasons) I'm the person they get to talk to in an effort to appeal the decision.
Those kind always start out saying, "I've paid taxes all my life and I deserve.."

bobabode 04-26-2013 07:17 PM

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...y.html?hpid=z1

:mad:Passed by Congress like greased lightning. I guess if you are an affluent business traveler? You are much more important than a kid in Headstart or an elderly cancer patient waiting for lifesaving chemotherapy. Talk about a sickening mindset in congress.:(


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.