Political Forums

Political Forums (http://www.politicalchat.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.politicalchat.org/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Carter Attacking Obama? (http://www.politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=4219)

bhunter 06-25-2012 09:30 PM

Carter Attacking Obama?
 
The great foreign policy expert Jimmy Carter is attacking Obama for the use of drones. It's almost like he really wants to make sure that Obama beats him out for the title of the worst modern democratic president.

Quote:

A former U.S. president is accusing the current president of sanctioning the "widespread abuse of human rights" by authorizing drone strikes to kill suspected terrorists.

Jimmy Carter, America's 39 th president, denounced the Obama administration for "clearly violating" 10 of the 30 articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, writing in a New York Times op-ed on Monday that the "United States is abandoning its role as the global champion of human rights."

"Instead of making the world safer, America's violation of international human rights abets our enemies and alienates our friends," Carter wrote.

While the total number of attacks from unmanned aircraft, or drones, and the resulting casualties are murky, the New America Foundation estimates that in Pakistan alone 265 drone strikes have been executed since January 2009 . Those strikes have killed at least 1,488 people, at least 1,343 of them considered militants, the foundation estimates based on news reports and other sources.
http://news.yahoo.com/jimmy-carter-a...-politics.html

finnbow 06-25-2012 09:40 PM

Who's he?:cool:

BlueStreak 06-25-2012 09:57 PM

A drunk, stands on a street corner at 2:15 a.m., screaming; "You people suck!! I'm better than ALL of you losers! I could have been the greatest!!"

Could he have been? And do you really care anyways?

Dave

BlueStreak 06-25-2012 09:59 PM

Actually, I've been thinking Obama should send a drone to the FauxNews studios.

BlueStreak 06-25-2012 10:03 PM

"Those strikes have killed at least 1,488 people, at least 1,343 of them considered militants......"

Impressive. Could we target one to hit Limbaughs house? Since his ass is as wide as a barn door, it shouldn't be hard........ Just program it to home in on the smell of bullshit.;)

CarlV 06-25-2012 10:09 PM

If using a drone saves an American life then I'm good with it.


Carl

djv8ga 06-25-2012 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by finnbow (Post 109242)
Who's he?:cool:

The worst Prez we had until the current Marxist moved into the White House.

Boreas 06-25-2012 10:12 PM

Part of me wants to tell Carter to STFU but, basically, I agree with much of what he wrote.

John

BlueStreak 06-25-2012 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djv8ga (Post 109258)
The worst Prez we had until the current Marxist moved into the White House.

Bush was a Marxist?

I love how you guys keep complaining that he promised to fix the economy and failed........It wouldn't have needed any fixing if the Republicans hadn't wrecked it in the first place.

bhunter 06-25-2012 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boreas (Post 109260)
Part of me wants to tell Carter to STFU but, basically, I agree with much of what he wrote.

John

I and the North Wind are in agreement. I've never liked the drone program because it makes it too convenient for those that wield them. They also have the potential to become widespread and are cheap enough that small nations or even non-state actors could deploy them. I've disliked Carter since the 70s, but here I think he just might be right.

BlueStreak 06-25-2012 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhunter (Post 109273)
I and the North Wind are in agreement. I've never liked the drone program because it makes it too convenient for those that wield them. They also have the potential to become widespread and are cheap enough that small nations or even non-state actors could deploy them. I've disliked Carter since the 70s, but here I think he just might be right.

Dude, they sell R/C "Spy Drones" at Walmart..............................

A radio controlled helicopter with a camera mounted on it. Welcome to the age of high tech Peeping Toms.

Seriously.

Dave

bobabode 06-25-2012 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlV (Post 109257)
If using a drone saves an American life then I'm good with it.


Carl

Yeah, me too. What's funny is that this star wars drone thing is straight out of right wing techno crazed MIC and just now it's abhorrent to them? Just more trash talkin', no more no less. The ratio of collateral damage is miniscule, comparatively. When did the rightys lose their balls?:confused:

icenine 06-25-2012 11:34 PM

I would rather use drones than have another several thousand young people die in some neocon invasion looking for weapons of mass destruction that do not exist. Obama is once again using drone technology that was developed into a fine art by.....you guessed it....BUSH!

The erudite fellow from AZ needs to change his signature.....

noonereal 06-26-2012 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djv8ga (Post 109258)
The worst Prez we had until the current Marxist moved into the White House.

:eek:

What makes Obie so bad?

I think many folks are just hatin' on the black man.

noonereal 06-26-2012 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by icenine (Post 109280)
I would rather use drones than have another several thousand young people die in some neocon invasion looking for weapons of mass destruction that do not exist. Obama is once again using drone technology that was developed into a fine art by.....you guessed it....BUSH!

The erudite fellow from AZ needs to change his signature.....

Every time I hear this it gets under my skin.

So what if Iraq did have WMD's?

We were still just as wrong to go in a second time.

The country was contained and Saddam was a rational actor.

He did have them the first time we went in and he still did not use them. :eek:

It is just so frustrating, then and now, when people justified war because of WMD's.

piece-itpete 06-26-2012 08:40 AM

There's good arguments on both sides, but Saddam a rational actor? :p

Pete

JJIII 06-26-2012 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piece-itpete (Post 109357)
There's good arguments on both sides, but Saddam a rational actor? :p

Pete

But of course, in a ruthless dictator kind of way.:)

Boreas 06-26-2012 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piece-itpete (Post 109357)
There's good arguments on both sides, but Saddam a rational actor? :p

Pete

Yes, totally rational. Evil but rational. His fatal mistake was in assuming that the Bush, Cheney and the Neo-cons were rational as well.

John

piece-itpete 06-26-2012 10:24 AM

Paying rewards to suicide bombers families? Check. Invading ajacent countries? Check. Firing on US warplanes daily? Check.

Clearly rational.

Pete

Zeke 06-26-2012 10:54 AM

"1343 / 1488 = 0.902553763" That's an "A" for accuracy in any classroom in the world.

(From the article) Carter criticized the current president for keeping the Guantanamo Bay detention center open, where prisoners "have been tortured by waterboarding more than 100 times or intimidated with semiautomatic weapons, power drills or threats to sexually assault their mothers."

Not in three years. :rolleyes:

I get the point, Gitmo is an international symbol for less than stellar United States activities but there are really only two choices: we can house these folks in the United States or on property controlled by the United States outside of the actual states or territories. (The population wasn't sanguine about moving these folks to detention centers in the contiguous 48 so we're left with the latter.)

Sum? We're left with military bases abroad. Which one is the closest? Gitmo.

The important part is that the atrocities are not ongoing.

Fuck Carter, go build houses.

icenine 06-26-2012 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boreas (Post 109366)
Yes, totally rational. Evil but rational. His fatal mistake was in assuming that the Bush, Cheney and the Neo-cons were rational as well.

John

Irrational to bluff the USA in order to keep up the appearance of parity with a much stronger neighbor Iran. When the US sent the whole 3rd Fleet over to the Gulf in January 03 he should have blinked. We had not done any sort of massive flotilla deployment like that in decades.

finnbow 06-26-2012 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by icenine (Post 109385)
Irrational to bluff the USA in order to keep up the appearance of parity with a much stronger neighbor Iran. When the US sent the whole 3rd Fleet over to the Gulf in January 03 he should have blinked. We had not done any sort of massive flotilla deployment like that in decades.

Maybe. However, he saw Iran as a greater existential threat than the US after the carnage of the Iran/Iraq war. I have to also believe he believed that the Mullahs were less rationale and more warlike than Bush/Cheney. On that count, he may have been wrong.

piece-itpete 06-26-2012 11:18 AM

Yeah, Saddam was more rational than Bush :rolleyes:

Pete

finnbow 06-26-2012 11:20 AM

My point was Dubya may have been less rational than the Mullahs. In retrospect, the Mullahs didn't rush into another invasion of Iraq and we did. What's that tell ya?

piece-itpete 06-26-2012 11:43 AM

They couldn't remake the ME on their own?

Pete

Dondilion 06-26-2012 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke (Post 109382)
"1343 / 1488 = 0.902553763" That's an "A" for accuracy in any classroom in the world.

Fuck Carter, go build houses.

I respect Carter: It takes great courage to speak, articulate ones conscience especially concerning unpopular opinions. Moreso if such make one appears weak.

America is enamored with the man of steel cult. I am more referring to theTrumanesgue and not the actor Reagan with his pathetic Lebanese show and ballyhooed invasion of a postage stamp size island.

I say to Carter build more houses and continue to voice your views.

icenine 06-26-2012 02:06 PM

I would take Carter over George W. Bush without a second thought...oops without W we would not President Obama...hmmmm.

:) Slam Dunk!

HatchetJack 06-26-2012 07:10 PM

That's pretty bad when Jimmy Carter don't like you?
That's like your grandmother not liking you or something.

noonereal 06-26-2012 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HatchetJack (Post 109439)
That's pretty bad when Jimmy Carter don't like you?
That's like your grandmother not liking you or something.

LOL, good post.

bobabode 06-27-2012 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piece-itpete (Post 109397)
They couldn't remake the ME on their own?

Pete

That'll never happen. The Arabs and the Persians hate each other more than they hate America. For Israel they might put aside their differences just long enough for Tehran to get nuked by the Israeli's.;)

Zeke 06-27-2012 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dondilion (Post 109406)
I respect Carter: It takes great courage to speak, articulate ones conscience especially concerning unpopular opinions.

It's not his conscience, it's his ego.

i just read a very unflattering book about old Jimmy. If 10% is accurate he snowed us all.

Dondilion 06-27-2012 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke (Post 109480)
It's not his conscience, it's his ego.

i just read a very unflattering book about old Jimmy. If 10% is accurate he snowed us all.

Whatever it is a contrarian voice is always welcome.

Even before I understood what the Nazis stood for I had a bad reaction to the pictures of their mass assembly.
WTF!! With so many hands up in the seig heil, how does the dissenter assert himself.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.