Political Forums

Political Forums (http://www.politicalchat.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.politicalchat.org/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Supreme Court Reverses Ruling On Arizona Voter ID (http://www.politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=3878)

djv8ga 04-17-2012 07:59 PM

Supreme Court Reverses Ruling On Arizona Voter ID
 
I have zero time this week to fight with you Leftys, but I had to get this posted.
http://www.kingmandailyminer.com/mai...51&TM=36612.56

barbara 04-17-2012 08:09 PM

It's ok not to have the time to fight.... But I do hope you find the time to have good, honest debate ......

Charles 04-17-2012 08:13 PM

Damn, the next thing you know you'll have to be not only a citizen but alive as well to vote.

Chas

Charles 04-17-2012 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barbara (Post 98295)
It's ok not to have the time to fight.... But I do hope you find the time to have good, honest debate ......

I love a debate, perhaps we should try it sometime.

And that wasn't directed at you, my Dear.

Chas

bobabode 04-17-2012 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charles (Post 98297)
I love a debate, perhaps we should try it sometime.

And that wasn't directed at you, my Dear.

Chas

Robert's Rules or the Marquis of Dingleberry's?:D:p

Charles 04-17-2012 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobabode (Post 98300)
Robert's Rules or the Marquis of Dingleberry's?:D:p

What's wrong with "According to Hoyle", as we all have money on the table?

Chas

CarlV 04-17-2012 11:18 PM

Quote:

If a voter does not have a photo identification card, he or she may still vote by showing two pieces of non-photo identification that have a name and address on them. Usable are: a utility bill that is dated within ninety days of the election such as gas, electric, water, solid waste, sewer, telephone, cell phone or cable television; a bank or credit union statement dated within the ninety days; a valid Arizona vehicle registration; an Indian census card; a property tax statement; a tribal enrollment card; a vehicle insurance card; a recorder's certificate; a valid government issued identification; or any "official election material" bearing the voter's name and address.
Well that ain't so bad as the asshats in the south or wherever wanting mandatory government photo id's.


Carl

bhunter 04-18-2012 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djv8ga (Post 98292)
I have zero time this week to fight with you Leftys, but I had to get this posted.
http://www.kingmandailyminer.com/mai...51&TM=36612.56

Great news! That ought get everyone frothing in the DNC.

bobabode 04-18-2012 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charles (Post 98305)
What's wrong with "According to Hoyle", as we all have money on the table?

Chas

Go fish or cut bait?:rolleyes:

bhunter 04-18-2012 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlV (Post 98329)
Well that ain't so bad as the asshats in the south or wherever wanting mandatory government photo id's.


Carl

Don't you remember the democrats pushing for a national ID card a few years back?

Quote:

As DDay reported, the Reid-Schumer-Menendez draft on Immigration Reform calls for a national ID card (which they call a “biometric” or “fraud proof” social security card). Perhaps in a move to placate civil libertarians, the draft insists the card will only be used for employment.

It will be unlawful for any person, corporation; organization local, state, or federal law enforcement officer; local or state government; or any other entity to require or even ask an individual cardholder to produce their social security card for any purpose other than electronic verification of employment eligibility and verification of identity for Social Security Administration purposes.

Further, isn't the democratic party in support of card check for union elections?

I can't think of a good reason that they'd be against IDs for voting. Can you?

bobabode 04-18-2012 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djv8ga (Post 98292)
I have zero time this week to fight with you Leftys, but I had to get this posted.
http://www.kingmandailyminer.com/mai...51&TM=36612.56

Chicky, chicky chicken......have fun with your hobbies.:p

bobabode 04-18-2012 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhunter (Post 98334)
Great news! That ought get everyone frothing in the DNC.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhunter (Post 98340)
Don't you remember the democrats pushing for a national ID card a few years back?




Further, isn't the democratic party in support of card check for union elections?

I can't think of a good reason that they'd be against IDs for voting. Can you?

Once again the blinders are on and there he goes:rolleyes: again.:p

merrylander 04-18-2012 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobabode (Post 98344)
Once again the blinders are on and there he goes:rolleyes: again.:p

Especially as the one instance of election fraud was by the GOP in Florida.

piece-itpete 04-18-2012 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charles (Post 98296)
Damn, the next thing you know you'll have to be not only a citizen but alive as well to vote.

Chas

BAM!

Pete

painter 04-18-2012 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlV (Post 98329)
Well that ain't so bad as the asshats in the south or wherever wanting mandatory government photo id's.


Carl

Last week while visiting my doctors office...they requested my driver's license to copy and put with my medical insurance information. When I asked why?
I was told... to prove who I said I was:confused:.
It seems there are those who use others medical insurance cards .
It didn't bother me...frankly I expected it to occur.

It's not the 50's anymore. :)

BlueStreak 04-18-2012 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by painter (Post 98412)
Last week while visiting my doctors office...they requested my driver's license to copy and put with my medical insurance information. When I asked why?
I was told... to prove who I said I was:confused:.
It seems there are those who use others medical insurance cards .
It didn't bother me...frankly I expected it to occur.

It's not the 50's anymore. :)

Yes. I experienced the same thing and was told the same when I was admitted for my hernia surgery. Twice, once at the surgeons office and once at the hospital.

Apparently this type of health insurance fraud is another aspect of the growing healthcare problem.

Personally, I think if everyone had their own coverage to begin with, this wouldn't happen.

bhunter 04-18-2012 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobabode (Post 98344)
Once again the blinders are on and there he goes:rolleyes: again.:p

The question stands. Why do democrats support IDs in some circumstances, but do not want them for public elections? IDs are quite ubiquitous and needed for virtually every aspect of modern day life.

bhunter 04-18-2012 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by merrylander (Post 98352)
Especially as the one instance of election fraud was by the GOP in Florida.

Why do you call it "fraud." Didn't several independent recounts by press demonstrate that Bush still would have won in 2000.

merrylander 04-18-2012 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhunter (Post 98436)
Why do you call it "fraud." Didn't several independent recounts by press demonstrate that Bush still would have won in 2000.

Independent press recounts? Define independent.:D

HAve you forgotten Ms. Harris?

bobabode 04-18-2012 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhunter (Post 98436)
Why do you call it "fraud." Didn't several independent recounts by press demonstrate that Bush still would have won in 2000.

I'm still blaming it on low voter turnout! It was 5 to 4 if you know what I mean.:rolleyes:My dangling chit must be showin'

wgrr 04-19-2012 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhunter (Post 98436)
Why do you call it "fraud." Didn't several independent recounts by press demonstrate that Bush still would have won in 2000.

Bush won only if the counties Gore asked for a recount in were counted. If the entire state had been recounted Gore would have won by a very slime margin of around 500 votes. Gore hung himself by requesting that only the heavily Democratic counties be recounted.

It did not make any difference one way or the other because 5 of the 9 unelected and unaccountable kings of the US stopped all the counting and appointed W President.

Wasillaguy 04-19-2012 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wgrr (Post 98546)
Gore would have won by a very slime margin

Love the Freudian typo!

piece-itpete 04-19-2012 12:58 PM

And wasn't it, if they counted how Bush wanted Gore would've won?

Chads. :)

Pete

noonereal 04-19-2012 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wgrr (Post 98546)
Bush won only if the counties Gore asked for a recount in were counted. If the entire state had been recounted Gore would have won by a very slime margin of around 500 votes. Gore hung himself by requesting that only the heavily Democratic counties be recounted.

It did not make any difference one way or the other because 5 of the 9 unelected and unaccountable kings of the US stopped all the counting and appointed W President.

Gore won. As with 60 Kennedy election sometimes it does not matter who wins.

historian 05-10-2012 07:59 PM

I can think of one very good reason for being against voter ID, it makes voter fraud harder.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.