Political Forums

Political Forums (http://www.politicalchat.org/index.php)
-   Current events (http://www.politicalchat.org/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Biden Impeachment Inquiry (http://www.politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=14061)

finnbow 09-28-2023 04:10 PM

Biden Impeachment Inquiry
 
I watched or listened to most of today's hearing. What a fucking joke. All 4 expert witnesses admitted that they had not seen any evidence to support the inquiry. Jamie Raskin and Dan Goldman ran absolute circles around James Comer, making him look the illiterate inbred spawn of Kentucky moonshiner.

Oerets 09-28-2023 05:12 PM

I tried to watch a few different times during the day. The desperation from the Republicans is showing.

Chicks 09-28-2023 06:08 PM

Even some Republicans admit Biden impeachment hearing is an ‘unmitigated disaster’
If Republicans can smear Biden as corrupt, then they can make Donald Trump, who is facing 91 criminal charges across four indictments, appear less corrupt to voters
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices...-b2420625.html

How low will these cretins stoop? Whell, how low do you think? : rolleyes:

finnbow 09-28-2023 06:15 PM

Even the ever shameless Jonathan Turley was visibly embarrassed about being the designated attorney among the witnesses representing the GOP POV. The other 2 GOP witnesses were also clueless, partisan clowns.

RickeyM 09-28-2023 06:30 PM

Betcha' whell's media sources saw a whole different hearing. He'll be along by and by to give us their spin on it.

finnbow 09-28-2023 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RickeyM (Post 424537)
Betcha' whell's media sources saw a whole different hearing. He'll be along by and by to give us their spin on it.

I suppose it depends on who he listens to. Bannon was apoplectic about Turley's admission that there's no there there. Whell can now be relied upon to wait until the GOP figures out how to spin this debacle for their faithful. Then he'll chime in with something profoundly stupid and shriek "strawman" or "logical fallacy" when we call him out for his dumbfounding credulity.

Here's an apt take this shit show inside a dumpster fire attempting to regurgitate Rudy's nonsense that got Trump impeached.

The impeachment inquiry against Biden remains an evidence-free farce put on by a party in cult-like grip to a con artist treading water in an ocean of legal jeopardy.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...s/70995287007/

Chicks 09-28-2023 09:02 PM

Fetterman mocks GOP's impeachment inquiry by sending James Comer a case of Bud Light
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...ding-bud-light

ROFL. Perfect!

This is probably the most factual article the Examiner has ever published.

RickeyM 09-28-2023 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by finnbow (Post 424538)
I suppose it depends on who he listens to. Bannon was apoplectic about Turley's admission that there's no there there. Whell can now be relied upon to wait until the GOP figures out how to spin this debacle for their faithful. Then he'll chime in with something profoundly stupid and shriek "strawman" or "logical fallacy" when we call him out for his dumbfounding credulity.

Here's an apt take this shit show inside a dumpster fire attempting to regurgitate Rudy's nonsense that got Trump impeached.

The impeachment inquiry against Biden remains an evidence-free farce put on by a party in cult-like grip to a con artist treading water in an ocean of legal jeopardy.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...s/70995287007/

From the article:
Quote:

In fact, for anyone who hasn’t marinated in the fetid swamps of Hunter Biden conspiracy theories, most of the hearing would sound like a bunch of lawmakers rambling on about obscure, poorly written political fan fiction.
So based on their allegations of wrongdoing, which they have no proof of, they're going in search of proof to justify their accusations. Did I get that right?

https://tse3.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.W...=Api&P=0&h=220

We'll get him with the next witness for sure...

bobabode 09-28-2023 09:58 PM

Ohhh my! The gentlelady from Texas has something to say.


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/202...ultitime-loser

finnbow 09-29-2023 07:30 AM

(V)iewers of Fox News on Thursday had to watch two of the network's stars pour cold water on the House GOP's impeachment inquiry. Contributor Jonathan Turley testified at the first hearing that the "current evidence" does not "support articles of impeachment" against the president. And host Neil Cavuto blasted the entire spectacle, telling his audience that he does not know "what was achieved" during the hearing. "The way this was built up — where there’s smoke there would be fire…but where there’s smoke today, we got more smoke," Cavuto said, noting "the promise of explosive testimony and proof ... did not materialize."

- Oliver Darcy, CNN

finnbow 09-29-2023 07:39 AM

Kash Patel on the impeachment hearing:

“You got your butts kicked by AOC! You got your butts handed to you by the Democrats. You had your opportunity to make your case, and I’m still waiting for it.”

Maybe Comer needs our boy Whell to present the case. LOL.

RickeyM 09-29-2023 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by finnbow (Post 424560)
Kash Patel on the impeachment hearing:

“You got your butts kicked by AOC! You got your butts handed to you by the Democrats. You had your opportunity to make your case, and I’m still waiting for it.”

Maybe Comer needs our boy Whell to present the case. LOL.

At the very least let Jimmy in on this mountain of evidence he claims exists.

RickeyM 09-29-2023 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobabode (Post 424551)
Ohhh my! The gentlelady from Texas has something to say.


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/202...ultitime-loser

https://media.tenor.co/images/0aec50...843c/tenor.gif


https://media1.tenor.com/images/a6a4...temid=11858172]

RickeyM 09-29-2023 08:23 AM

Seriously guys, the Repubs can't be this incompetent, can they? Or is it impotent?

Ike Bana 09-29-2023 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RickeyM (Post 424565)
Seriously guys, the Repubs can't be this incompetent, can they? Or is it impotent?

Flaccid, limp, and impotent.

RickeyM 09-29-2023 09:26 AM

Blowing their wad early?

Say What?!? Jeanine Pirro Blurts Out Most Bizarre Impeachment Analysis Yet

Quote:

Jeanine Pirro
“You don’t blow the wad or the witness at the inquiry, OK?”
Quote:

Rich Campbell
Especially if you don't have any witnesses. You've got to save all your nonwitnesses for the actual impeachment.

Oerets 09-29-2023 09:53 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by RickeyM (Post 424565)
Seriously guys, the Repubs can't be this incompetent, can they? Or is it impotent?


Know their base, all to well.

Chicks 09-29-2023 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oerets (Post 424576)
Know their base, all to well.

...and all too Whell.

donquixote99 09-29-2023 10:23 AM

^^ Bam!

finnbow 10-01-2023 10:28 AM

At a recent Oversight Committee hearing, Nancy Mace (R-SC) accused Joe Biden of bribery, money laundering, and orchestrating a prostitution ring.

This morning:

BARTIROMO: Have you been able to identify specific policy decisions Joe Biden made that he was paid for?

NANCY MACE: I have not had the ability to research that...

https://twitter.com/i/status/1708490698985546059

finnbow 10-01-2023 10:41 AM

House Freedom Caucus Member Ken Buck: "The impeachment inquiry is a distraction to make sure people don’t focus on the dysfunction of the GOP..."

It sure seems to have worked with Whell.

RickeyM 10-01-2023 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by finnbow (Post 424680)
At a recent Oversight Committee hearing, Nancy Mace (R-SC) accused Joe Biden of bribery, money laundering, and orchestrating a prostitution ring.

This morning:

BARTIROMO: Have you been able to identify specific policy decisions Joe Biden made that he was paid for?

NANCY MACE: I have not had the ability to research that...

https://twitter.com/i/status/1708490698985546059

I'd like to know based on what exactly? I know it's all based on nothing but I'd like to hear these people give (or try to) an explanation. Also another question is why didn't tRump and his DOJ act on any of this blatant criminality of the Biden family while he was in office? And finally, this stuff supposedly happened when Joe was VP so why are they not going after Obama. We know they hate his guts and any influence Biden sold would go nowhere unless Obama was in on it.

Just a few of my wonderings on a Sunday afternoon.

https://media.giphy.com/media/Xepskm...1rb7/giphy.gif

donquixote99 10-02-2023 11:11 AM

On-point commentary seen in Doug Muder's 'The Sift' today:

Quote:

The longer the Republican investigation of Biden stays at the level of "Hunter did shady things and Joe must have been involved somehow", the more likely it is to go nowhere.

A tip on interpreting headlines: When a headline attributes some wrong-doing to "the Biden family", that means the article contains no new information about President Biden himself. If they had anything on Joe, that would be the headline.
http://weeklysift.com/2023/10/02/simple-propositions/


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.