Violence?
 

Is anyone else wondering when all of these idiots are finally going to be triggered to violence?

Really. They're heavily armed, living in a fantasyland wherein Rambo and Superman are real, they practically worship Trump like he's some sort of God, a right many of them are so fucking dumb they honestly believe "Libtards" have made cars MORE dangerous than they were in the '60s and that mass shootings have nothing to do with guns, among a host of other untruths to downright absurdities...…

So, is it really much of a stretch to wonder when the King of Imbeciles is going to tell them to go ahead and start shooting? If impeachment starts looking feasible? If losing the election becomes a serious possibility? If something fatal should happen to Emperor Dipshit that they misconstrue as an assassination, like he chokes while eating a taco? (Killary poisoned his taco!:rolleyes:)

I'm beginning to think this is a very real possibility.

An uprising to keep Trump in power is quite possible. Say the election is lost, but DC is occupied by pro-Trump militia. Could a new president be inaugurated? The Army could sweep aside the militia, but amid claims of fraud on both sides, would the Army act?

Also, in such a situation, one can expect ad-hoc death squads to crop up across the country....

Trump and his Cult members will not go quietly into the night when the time comes!

El Paso. It's already started.

The death squads I'm talking about don't target racial enemies, they target political enemies.

Right. "Enemies of the People". Sound familiar?

I fear much akin to the issue of slavery and the solution, our new testing of our democracy may well require a blood sacrifice.
Hope the country is smarter then that, until the next transgression is ignored or accepted by the cult of blind followers. Makes me worried the contrary is true!

If the impeachment starts looking feasible?

So far, a fiasco.
The only good it increases Warren chance of becoming the nominee.

Biden is a loud embarrassment to the Democratic Party.

Apt heading - Ukraine Connection.
Indeed, looking more like Ukraine with its many militias.

Blame the Ukraine? Are you fucking serious?

You truly are as ignorant as Whell.

Biden and the Clintons are huge embarrassment to Americans who often look towards the Democratic party for cover and leadership.

Obama was such a sophisticated politician. As the saying goes: Nough respect.

I trust you get some personal satisfaction from distilling your beliefs down to a few elliptical assertions. I can assure you, however, that from my perspective you make less and less sense. So the posts are not achieving much in the way of communication.

Basically how could democrats who rant and rave about the repubs, while claiming a higher moral floor, could be so deaf and blind to the Clintons and Biden's.

First, your grammar is atrocious, indicating a minimal education. You are the ideal target for Faux "News", a ready recipient for their vile conspiracy mongering, via disgusting pigs like Fucker Carlson. Sadly, it's obviously working quite well on you.

People who resort to grammar in online settings are usually empty, have no substantive argument. You are definitely one such person.

You have never laid down anything of your own.
From all your so call reading...what is your personal evaluation, analysis on a particular issue? Nil!

An empty barrel hiding behind the Times, the Post or whatever.

The question still remains: How could Democrats who claim the higher ground be so deaf and blind re the Clintons and Bidens?

How do you expect a serious answer to such a loaded question?

1. Not admitting the Clintons are awful, but leave then out of it in any case--old news.
2. Do you have actual evidence of actual wrongdoing by the Bidens? I think not.
3. Even if the Bidens were dirty, it doesn't make Trump right to ignore the law going after them. You're basically engaging in a whataboutery defense.

This, from someone who quite obviously simply parrots whatever he hears from Faux "News", lol. You're as sad and empty as Whell.

Whell has really driven you crazy.

Whell is simply a metaphor for the ignorance and stupidity of all MAGAMorons. That's no doubt over your head to understand.

I suggest you remove the mote from thine own eye first, tovarisch.

Who you trying to fool with that metaphor cover? Whell really got into your skin 24/7. ..Whell Derangement Syndrome and as so often with you it was very personal.

1) The only Clinton that can be left out is Chelsea. Wikileaks showed her as being very distraught about even the hint or appearance of impropriety.

2)Obviously I have no evidence. However it is also obvious that Biden is very unconcerned with appearance with his son in tow. It indicates a serious lack of class.

3) My input, post #10, was not in defense of Trump, but in reaction to feasible and the glare on Biden which is good since it increases the chance of Warren.

Democrats should not repeat the same mistake they made with the Hillary candidacy.

As for impeachment being a fiasco, the worst case is that after massive hearings and debate on TV, in which Republican incumbents will be forced to defend the indefensible, there will be a vote in the Senate. Some Republicans will be forced to vote for impeachment at risk of losing re-election, further besmirching Trump in the general election. Though it's likely enough that Trump will win the Senate vote, his chances in 2020 will be grossly diminished.

And if Trump manages to look bad enough that opinion flips on him in enough red states, he could be convicted in the Senate. The Senate vote is his to lose, but he's just the man who could do it.

You are obviously too stupid to get it, so I'll just ignore you from now on, much as I'd love to point out your ignorant regurgitation of conspiracy mongering fools.

The more pressing issue lay with whoever is currently sitting in the Oval Office. And who is that? If there is a problem with anyone else, it is a separate issue. We're not letting Trump get away with criminal behavior because of whatever the GOP propaganda machine alleges someone or anyone else may or may not have done.

Does that answer your idiotic question?

No shit. Spaciba.

Now, back on topic. How long do you think It'll be before the Pied Piper of Heavily Armed Ignoramuses and Wannabe Sons of Liberty gives the nod to show the world what horrible people they truly are?

Yep....any day now.

A comment seen on FB:

By Richard Davis

21 Signs of Impending Tyranny (updated)

As tyrants take control of democracies, they typically:

1. Demand total personal loyalty from all appointees.
2. Organize military parades and other choreographed shows of force.
3. Threaten to fire independent prosecutors who get too close to the truth.
4. Spread conspiracy theories about "deep state" forces seeking to oust them.
5. Refer to top-ranking military leaders as "my" generals.
6. Threaten to jail political opponents.
7. Claim to have won an election by a landslide even after losing the popular vote.
8. Stoke tensions abroad, such as trade wars and even the specter of nuclear war, to distract from their efforts to consolidate power at home.
9. Circumvent the independent press and communicate directly with their followers.
10. Turn the public against journalists or media outlets that criticize the regime, calling them “deceitful” and “scum.”
11. Vilify legislators and judges who are critical of the regime.
12. Repeatedly claim massive voter fraud in the absence of any evidence, in order to restrict voting in subsequent elections.
13. Repeatedly tell big lies, causing the public to doubt the truth and to believe fictions that support the tyrants’ goals.
14. Blame crime on immigrants or racial or religious minorities, and foment public bias and hatred against them.
15. Threaten mass deportations, registries of religious minorities, and the banning of refugees.
16. Separate refugee children from their parents, and incarcerate all of them.
17. Attribute acts of domestic violence to “enemies within,” and use such events as excuses to beef up internal security and limit civil liberties.
18. Appoint family members to high positions of authority.
19. Draw no distinction between personal property and public property, profiteering from public office.
20. Make personal alliances with foreign dictators but express indifference if not defiance toward leaders of democracies.
21. Maintain a powerful propaganda arm that claims to be "fair and balanced" but only amplifies the tyrant's lies and accusations.

Chilling reading.

An intelligence officer reports on the loyalties if the armed forces. Civil war scenarios could result in splintered army .
https://www.thedailybeast.com/if-tru...ource=facebook

Donq there is no mention here of China or the southern border.

Please explain what this fact means to you in the context of this piece? The significance is not obvious to me.

The writer claims to be perplexed by the significant support for Trump by members of the military despite Trump non military attendance and Trump's dissing of traditional and important military figures.

one would think that there would be some mention of Trump's loud attack on China as a factor informing this support. Many people are pissed that China was allowed to string the US along for so long and that a country which is still under the communist party benefited so much from the deindustrialization of the US. A visit to Walmart tells the story.

A soldier is not immune to the fallout. I suspect that many who are on the ramparts, have love ones, relatives, persons they know who were thrown on the scrap heap or their horizons diminished because of the heavy use of China.

Trump's loud attempt in trying to secure the southern border and strong resistance to his every move I believe would affect military personnel especially those who are trained to, expect to defend and secure other nations.

Whenever there are glaring omissions in my opinion in an article I tend to discount its integrity.

Now that's funny, coming from someone who regularly touts Fucker Carlson, who constantly lies by omission! :rolleyes: You're delusional.

The core of the article isn't really 'the military culture is very pro-Trump: how irrational.' It's just 'the military culture is very pro-Trump.' Period. That bare fact is what I find chilling, and you do not seem to disagree with it.