Political Forums

Political Forums (http://www.politicalchat.org/index.php)
-   Current events (http://www.politicalchat.org/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   I hope you can let this go (http://www.politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=11698)

CarlV 05-16-2017 06:34 PM

I hope you can let this go
 
aka obstruction of justice.:rolleyes:



Quote:

reuters.com
Trump asked Comey to shut down Flynn probe: source | Reuters
By Mark Hosenball | WASHINGTON
3 minutes
Politics|Tue May 16, 2017 | 6:30pm EDT

WASHINGTON President Donald Trump asked then-FBI Director James Comey to shut down an investigation into ties between former White House national security adviser Michael Flynn and Russia, an associate of Comey, who has seen the memo, said on Tuesday.

The associate told Reuters that the details of the document as first reported by the New York Times were accurate.

“I hope you can let this go,” Trump told Comey, according to the language of the memo, which the source confirmed.

The White House denied the report in a statement to reporters, saying it was "not a truthful or accurate portrayal of the conversation between the President and Mr. Comey."

The memo was written by Comey immediately after his meeting in the White House Oval Office with Trump one day after Flynn resigned over his contacts with Russians.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-us...KCN18C2Q8?il=0

bobabode 05-16-2017 07:32 PM

T'Rumplestiltskin is finding out what happens when you fuck with the FBI. :cool:

Oerets 05-16-2017 07:33 PM

Just what is it gonna take for the supporters of the orange one to see the truth?


Barney

donquixote99 05-16-2017 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobabode (Post 353787)
T'Rumplestiltskin is finding out what happens when you fuck with the FBI. :cool:

"Don't fuck with the FBI" should probably rank right at the top of the list of classic blunders, right after "never get involved in a land war in Asia."

Just hope Trump doesn't run the list....

donquixote99 05-16-2017 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oerets (Post 353788)
Just what is it gonna take for the supporters of the orange one to see the truth?


Barney

For the hard core (25-30%) just about nothing will do it as long as Trump keeps fighting. Only when he surrenders or dies will the bond be broken.

They may 'see the truth,' but it won't matter, they still will stay loyal.

Rajoo 05-16-2017 08:13 PM

In the eyes of many of Trump's supporters, he is an outsider elected for the express purpose of draining the swamp (lay waste the establishment). As long as the establishment is still there and Trump keeps pointing his fingers at others, they will believe him. He is their hero and Trump will always find a scapegoat.

CarlV 05-16-2017 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rajoo (Post 353793)
In the eyes of many of Trump's supporters, he is an outsider elected for the express purpose of draining the swamp (lay waste the establishment). As long as the establishment is still there and Trump keeps pointing his fingers at others, they will believe him. He is their hero and Trump will always find a scapegoat.

And instead he made the White House into an even bigger swamp.

merrylander 05-17-2017 09:40 AM

It even has Caffretz ready to subpoena Comey's notes. Guess he plans to run for the Bishop's seat in the Senate.

merrylander 05-17-2017 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlV (Post 353794)
And instead he made the White House into an even bigger swamp.

Reminds me I just had our septic tank pumped out.:)

whell 06-07-2017 01:41 PM

I hope Democrats can let this go. But I suspect that they'll just find something else to obsess about.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/read...-conversations

Comey will also testify that he told the President on three separate occasions that he was not personally the target of the federal intelligence investigation—assurances Trump spoke about publicly. A key caveat, however, is that Comey told Trump he was reluctant to make that information public “because it would create a duty to correct, should that change,” per the statement.

finnbow 06-07-2017 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 355073)
I hope Democrats can let this go. But I suspect that they'll just find something else to obsess about.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/read...-conversations

Comey will also testify that he told the President on three separate occasions that he was not personally the target of the federal intelligence investigation—assurances Trump spoke about publicly. A key caveat, however, is that Comey told Trump he was reluctant to make that information public “because it would create a duty to correct, should that change,” per the statement.

Comey confirmed that, at the time, Trump was not a subject of the counter-intelligence investigation (though his minions were). There is a good chance, however, that he is the subject of an obstruction of justice investigation by Mueller. In any event, Trump is a low-life, malignant skank and your unwavering loyalty to him says a great deal about you.

CarlV 06-07-2017 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 355073)
I hope Democrats can let this go. But I suspect that they'll just find something else to obsess about.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/read...-conversations

Comey will also testify that he told the President on three separate occasions that he was not personally the target of the federal intelligence investigation—assurances Trump spoke about publicly. A key caveat, however, is that Comey told Trump he was reluctant to make that information public “because it would create a duty to correct, should that change,” per the statement.

Too bad that has absolutely nothing to do with Trump's obstruction of Justice that will come to light tomorrow.

Jump aboard the sinking ship boys. :rolleyes:

barbara 06-07-2017 05:18 PM

So, what I heard on tv from the "experts" is that the language used is important. Within the investigative team there is a difference between a "subject" of an investigation and a "target" of an investigation.

They mentioned other nuances of language that would make a difference but those two terms are what seemed to be the crux of the issue they were debating.

bobabode 06-07-2017 06:03 PM

"James Comey’s seven-page written statement, released by the Senate Intelligence Committee this afternoon in connection with Comey’s impending testimony tomorrow, draws no conclusions, makes no allegations, and indeed, expresses no opinions. It recounts, in spare and simple prose, a set of facts to which Comey is prepared to testify under oath tomorrow. Despite this sparseness, or maybe I should say because of it, it is the most shocking single document compiled about the official conduct of the public duties of any President since the release of the Watergate tapes." Lawfare

https://www.lawfareblog.com/initial-...tten-testimony

bobabode 06-07-2017 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 355073)
I hope Democrats can let this go. But I suspect that they'll just find something else to obsess about.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/read...-conversations

Comey will also testify that he told the President on three separate occasions that he was not personally the target of the federal intelligence investigation—assurances Trump spoke about publicly. A key caveat, however, is that Comey told Trump he was reluctant to make that information public “because it would create a duty to correct, should that change,” per the statement.

Cling, baby. Cling. :rolleyes:

Rajoo 06-07-2017 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barbara (Post 355084)
So, what I heard on tv from the "experts" is that the language used is important. Within the investigative team there is a difference between a "subject" of an investigation and a "target" of an investigation.

They mentioned other nuances of language that would make a difference but those two terms are what seemed to be the crux of the issue they were debating.

Thank you for the explanation and it does make sense. So with this caveat, those around Trump directly involved in Russian meddling are targets such as Flynn & Kushner. I simply cannot believe that Trump did not know what was going on at least in essence.

Pio1980 06-07-2017 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barbara (Post 355084)
So, what I heard on tv from the "experts" is that the language used is important. Within the investigative team there is a difference between a "subject" of an investigation and a "target" of an investigation.

They mentioned other nuances of language that would make a difference but those two terms are what seemed to be the crux of the issue they were debating.

Unlike with 45, the grown-ups know that words matter, and precise communication depends on their meaning in context.

barbara 06-07-2017 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rajoo (Post 355087)
Thank you for the explanation and it does make sense. So with this caveat, those around Trump directly involved in Russian meddling are targets such as Flynn & Kushner. I simply cannot believe that Trump did not know what was going on at least in essence.



I'm beginning to think a law degree would be helpful in understanding all of this.

And, I believe the current questioning has more to do about if Trump tried to have the initial investigation squashed rather than the contact with Russians.

Pio1980 06-07-2017 09:49 PM

E.J. Dionne: A constitutionally impossible relationship - http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/537838...e-relationship

HarmanKardon 06-08-2017 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donquixote99 (Post 353792)
For the hard core (25-30%) just about nothing will do it as long as Trump keeps fighting. Only when he surrenders or dies will the bond be broken.

They may 'see the truth,' but it won't matter, they still will stay loyal.

Same with hard core Hitlerists, even in Spring, 1945!

tonyk 06-08-2017 07:00 AM

Today is a great day, I feel pretty good that Comey, like the little boy in the fairy tale, is about to tell the whole world "the Emperor has no clothes".



Colbert was hilarious last night reading excerpts of Comey's prepared statements as well, some bizarre stuff indeed.



https://youtu.be/yrIXBklJ5YQ

HarmanKardon 06-08-2017 07:02 AM

I agree with you. But America's "little boy" is 203 centimeters tall...;)

Keeping my fingers crossed for a good show!

tonyk 06-08-2017 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HarmanKardon (Post 355099)
I agree with you. But America's "little boy" is 203 centimeters tall...;)

Keeping my fingers crossed for a good show!

203 centimeters of integrity.

donquixote99 06-08-2017 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HarmanKardon (Post 355095)
Same with hard core Hitlerists, even in Spring, 1945!

That example was in my mind. Others deserted, but the hard core kept fighting in utterly hopeless situation, until they heard Hitler was dead. That's the authoritarian leader-follower bond, and it's why we may have an actual fight on our hands here, in a while.

https://www.wsws.org/asset/e309ee3c-...ition=image480

A squad of mostly-junior officers was assembled behind Trump for a short time during his inaugural speech. No administration sources would comment on this unusual military display. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/201.../mili-j23.html

finnbow 06-08-2017 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HarmanKardon (Post 355095)
Same with hard core Hitlerists, even in Spring, 1945!

And much later than that. As a kid in Mannheim in the early 1960's, my landlord and his wife were still outspoken fans of Hitler. I also ran into some crusty old coots during the '78-'86 time frame while drinking in the beer halls of Munich and country guesthouses near Fulda who were still outspoken Hitler fans.

Chicks 06-08-2017 09:39 AM

They want to believe in their dear leader, no matter that he lies to them, and is a miserable failure at governance. Trump supporters are about as stupid as Mussolini supporters...

http://www.snopes.com/history/govern/trains.asp

Pio1980 06-08-2017 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by finnbow (Post 355102)
And much later than that. As a kid in Mannheim in the early 1960's, my landlord and his wife were still outspoken fans of Hitler. I also ran into some crusty old coots during the '78-'86 time frame while drinking in the beer halls of Munich and country guesthouses near Fulda who were still outspoken Hitler fans.

I had heard about that, but never encountered it. Conservative clockstopper mentality, with a dose of "I've got (had) mine, fuck you".

Chicks 06-08-2017 09:51 AM

Comey confirming what we all knew already. Trump and his crew will lie, cheat, defame. Bunch of scumbags. Throw them out!

Chicks 06-08-2017 10:12 AM

Comey: "Lordy, I hope there are tapes!"

Me too, but I'm pretty sure the liar-in-chief has destroyed them by now.

whell 06-08-2017 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlV (Post 355083)
Too bad that has absolutely nothing to do with Trump's obstruction of Justice that will come to light tomorrow.

Jump aboard the sinking ship boys. :rolleyes:

So far, no testimony from Comey to suggest obstruction, so you may be disappointing here as well.

Its also good to see that you've moved away from accusations of criminal behavior prior to or after the election, and now focused on the "process crime" of obstruction. Still, I can imagine how disappointing it is when your hopes are dashed. :rolleyes:

No evidence.

Dondilion 06-08-2017 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 355107)
So far, no testimony from Comey to suggest obstruction, so you may be disappointing here as well.

The failure to have a coronation has evolved in multiple efforts to cripple the state.

Chicks 06-08-2017 11:46 AM

Goodness, did Sen McCain forget to take his meds this morning? Twice he mixed up Comey with Trump. Then he carried on as if the Russian investigation and the Clinton email investigation were one and the same! I thought he was one of the never Trump white hats, but here he sounded like a doddering old fool.

bobabode 06-08-2017 11:49 AM

A song for Cheetolini... :cool:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE5Ve0y0m1Y

Rajoo 06-08-2017 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dondilion (Post 355111)
The failure to have a coronation has evolved in multiple efforts to cripple the state.

Perhaps a compromised Queen would have been better than an out of control know nothing pussy grabbing dictator. :D

Chicks 06-08-2017 12:13 PM

Trump this morning, addressing a mostly white, red state audience:

"We will always support our evangelical community and defend your right and the right of all Americans to follow and to live by the teachings of their faith,” he said. “And as you know, we are under siege. You understand that. But we will come out bigger and better and stronger than ever, you watch.”

So, are Muslims included in "all Americans", Donny? How about agnostics and atheists? Who, exactly, is under siege? By whom? Aren't you, Donny boy, supposed to be the leader of all Americans? Shouldn't you be trying to reconcile differences among us, not tearing us apart by telling a mostly white Republican minority group they are "under siege"?

HarmanKardon 06-08-2017 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by finnbow (Post 355102)
And much later than that. As a kid in Mannheim in the early 1960's, my landlord and his wife were still outspoken fans of Hitler. I also ran into some crusty old coots during the '78-'86 time frame while drinking in the beer halls of Munich and country guesthouses near Fulda who were still outspoken Hitler fans.

We called them "Altnazis". There were a lot of them. It is a shame.

Pio1980 06-08-2017 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dondilion (Post 355111)
The failure to have a coronation has evolved in multiple efforts to cripple the state.

The elevation of this arrogant vacuous incompetent asshole to the Oval has done that.

Chicks 06-08-2017 01:49 PM

Feel the need to take a shower after watching Kasowitz's statement. What a slimeball. Easy to see why no legit law firm wants to represent Trump and have to deal with this guy.

finnbow 06-08-2017 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whell (Post 355107)
So far, no testimony from Comey to suggest obstruction, so you may be disappointing here as well.

Its also good to see that you've moved away from accusations of criminal behavior prior to or after the election, and now focused on the "process crime" of obstruction. Still, I can imagine how disappointing it is when your hopes are dashed. :rolleyes:

No evidence.

That's exactly what got Nixon.

Pio1980 06-08-2017 02:36 PM

Evidence of a cover-up, certainly.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.