![]() |
I hope you can let this go
aka obstruction of justice.:rolleyes:
Quote:
|
T'Rumplestiltskin is finding out what happens when you fuck with the FBI. :cool:
|
Just what is it gonna take for the supporters of the orange one to see the truth?
Barney |
Quote:
Just hope Trump doesn't run the list.... |
Quote:
They may 'see the truth,' but it won't matter, they still will stay loyal. |
In the eyes of many of Trump's supporters, he is an outsider elected for the express purpose of draining the swamp (lay waste the establishment). As long as the establishment is still there and Trump keeps pointing his fingers at others, they will believe him. He is their hero and Trump will always find a scapegoat.
|
Quote:
|
It even has Caffretz ready to subpoena Comey's notes. Guess he plans to run for the Bishop's seat in the Senate.
|
Quote:
|
I hope Democrats can let this go. But I suspect that they'll just find something else to obsess about.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/read...-conversations Comey will also testify that he told the President on three separate occasions that he was not personally the target of the federal intelligence investigation—assurances Trump spoke about publicly. A key caveat, however, is that Comey told Trump he was reluctant to make that information public “because it would create a duty to correct, should that change,” per the statement. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Jump aboard the sinking ship boys. :rolleyes: |
So, what I heard on tv from the "experts" is that the language used is important. Within the investigative team there is a difference between a "subject" of an investigation and a "target" of an investigation.
They mentioned other nuances of language that would make a difference but those two terms are what seemed to be the crux of the issue they were debating. |
"James Comey’s seven-page written statement, released by the Senate Intelligence Committee this afternoon in connection with Comey’s impending testimony tomorrow, draws no conclusions, makes no allegations, and indeed, expresses no opinions. It recounts, in spare and simple prose, a set of facts to which Comey is prepared to testify under oath tomorrow. Despite this sparseness, or maybe I should say because of it, it is the most shocking single document compiled about the official conduct of the public duties of any President since the release of the Watergate tapes." Lawfare
https://www.lawfareblog.com/initial-...tten-testimony |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm beginning to think a law degree would be helpful in understanding all of this. And, I believe the current questioning has more to do about if Trump tried to have the initial investigation squashed rather than the contact with Russians. |
E.J. Dionne: A constitutionally impossible relationship - http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/537838...e-relationship
|
Quote:
|
Today is a great day, I feel pretty good that Comey, like the little boy in the fairy tale, is about to tell the whole world "the Emperor has no clothes".
Colbert was hilarious last night reading excerpts of Comey's prepared statements as well, some bizarre stuff indeed. https://youtu.be/yrIXBklJ5YQ |
I agree with you. But America's "little boy" is 203 centimeters tall...;)
Keeping my fingers crossed for a good show! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.wsws.org/asset/e309ee3c-...ition=image480 A squad of mostly-junior officers was assembled behind Trump for a short time during his inaugural speech. No administration sources would comment on this unusual military display. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/201.../mili-j23.html |
Quote:
|
They want to believe in their dear leader, no matter that he lies to them, and is a miserable failure at governance. Trump supporters are about as stupid as Mussolini supporters...
http://www.snopes.com/history/govern/trains.asp |
Quote:
|
Comey confirming what we all knew already. Trump and his crew will lie, cheat, defame. Bunch of scumbags. Throw them out!
|
Comey: "Lordy, I hope there are tapes!"
Me too, but I'm pretty sure the liar-in-chief has destroyed them by now. |
Quote:
Its also good to see that you've moved away from accusations of criminal behavior prior to or after the election, and now focused on the "process crime" of obstruction. Still, I can imagine how disappointing it is when your hopes are dashed. :rolleyes: No evidence. |
Quote:
|
Goodness, did Sen McCain forget to take his meds this morning? Twice he mixed up Comey with Trump. Then he carried on as if the Russian investigation and the Clinton email investigation were one and the same! I thought he was one of the never Trump white hats, but here he sounded like a doddering old fool.
|
|
Quote:
|
Trump this morning, addressing a mostly white, red state audience:
"We will always support our evangelical community and defend your right and the right of all Americans to follow and to live by the teachings of their faith,” he said. “And as you know, we are under siege. You understand that. But we will come out bigger and better and stronger than ever, you watch.” So, are Muslims included in "all Americans", Donny? How about agnostics and atheists? Who, exactly, is under siege? By whom? Aren't you, Donny boy, supposed to be the leader of all Americans? Shouldn't you be trying to reconcile differences among us, not tearing us apart by telling a mostly white Republican minority group they are "under siege"? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Feel the need to take a shower after watching Kasowitz's statement. What a slimeball. Easy to see why no legit law firm wants to represent Trump and have to deal with this guy.
|
Quote:
|
Evidence of a cover-up, certainly.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.