![]() |
You Can’t Fight Trump Without Understanding The Anti-Globalization Movement
Actually why would I want to fight Trump?
I'm all for anti-Globalisation and anti-interventionism. This is a lot of the reason why I see Trump as a better choice than Clinton would have been. http://www.newslogue.com/debate/332/CaitlinJohnstone Quote:
|
Let me hear your balalaika ringin' out...:rolleyes:
|
Quote:
http://i843.photobucket.com/albums/z...16d0709702.jpg |
Whine, whine, whine - spodiodeo. :rolleyes: When are you moving to St. Petersberg?
|
Opposing globalization is like opposing gravity. Only dimwitted fools or Trump supporters (I think I just repeated myself) believe that we can turn back the hands of time to post-WWII America when we were the only intact industrial power in the world.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe I will. I was born and raised just a few miles up the road from there. I miss the place. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmpeBUXT5Rw |
Quote:
As for anti-interventionism, why does Trump want to spend even more for defense. We are not under attack from any foreign power, now or in any foreseeable future. Better equipping the armed forces does not really help fighting terrorism either. So Trump or Clinton, same difference. It's the mighty MIC and every Senator is beholden to them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Shouldn't you be over at Blightfarts or Russian Times with your girlfriend Caitlin?
|
Quote:
|
The Democrat Party is sealing their fate for the foreseeable future.
Apparently they learned nothing from the dismantling that occurred under Obama. The majority of the country is against open borders, which is why Trump won to start with. The majority don't give a shit about inconveniencing a handful of people. Particularly when SCOTUS is going to spank the ninth like they have 84% of the time. So, what do the geniuses do. Double down on it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As to interventionist, there was tremendous pressure placed on Obama, to take on Russia in Europe and the M. East. For the most part he resisted and it was hope for a more willing president--Clinton. Trump is more anti China because he believes that China has out foxed us economically. This does not sit well with the Soros clique which was kicked out of Russia and sees Russia as the major force opposing, globalization, One World Order--the disappearance of sovereign states. |
Quote:
Caitlin Johnstone is a expat shill for Russia Times, a Putin apologist and batshit crazy. |
Quote:
The Putin apologist thing is tired. |
Quote:
|
Soros lost $8.5 million on Hillary PAC which is pretty cool.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He was the only man to shake the bank of England. :D He is real! He said he was sorry he had supported Obama instead of Clinton. I guess because Obama did not go far enough. He said he would spend any amount of money to defeat George Bush. However Bush had the oil money and some luck. From 2013 he became Co Chair for the finance of Clinton election. She was a certainty and ended spending $1.4 billion. George Soros is bitter! He thought he would get her to crack open Russia--the only place on earth which has denied him access to carry out his manipulations. George Soros and his multiple fronts are real. |
Whatever you say, tovarich. :D
Just don't take tea with brother Vladimir, OK? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Realistically what threats do these people pose to the US when compared to Putin and Trump. If you don't think Trump is a threat, you need to read the US constitution carefully. I don't think Trump is sinister per se but probably a bit deranged from his behavior the past three weeks. His mentor Steve Bannon is truly sinister and he is the one with the puppet strings. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Additionally China is seen as being too unscrupulous with its rampant disregard for intellectual property, its huge industrial espionage and the pressure it puts on American companies operating in China. At the same time China is using the proceeds from its lopsided interface with the west to rapidly improve and expand its military to try and control the high seas in its area. Just look at its outrageous claims re the South China Sea. I believe that China is preparing for any possible confrontation with the US over Taiwan. There are enough check and balances to control whatever over reach coming from Trump. The Putin thing is noise--Just check Harry Reid and Sanders. :D Russia is economically weak and is in a reactive mode to perceived threats on its borders. It is not setting up missiles near the US. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm the left and I hate the fucker. |
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.