Political Forums

Political Forums (http://www.politicalchat.org/index.php)
-   Current events (http://www.politicalchat.org/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Pulling a Wells Fargo. (http://www.politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=11074)

CarlV 10-22-2016 03:43 PM

Pulling a Wells Fargo.
 
I guess that could become a standard phrase. Anyway, this how we take care of our own. Sad.


Quote:


David S. Cloud

Short of troops to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan a decade ago, the California National Guard enticed thousands of soldiers with bonuses of $15,000 or more to reenlist and go to war.

Now the Pentagon is demanding the money back.

Nearly 10,000 soldiers, many of whom served multiple combat tours, have been ordered to repay large enlistment bonuses — and slapped with interest charges, wage garnishments and tax liens if they refuse — after audits revealed widespread overpayments by the California Guard at the height of the wars last decade.

Investigations have determined that lack of oversight allowed for widespread fraud and mismanagement by California Guard officials under pressure to meet enlistment targets.

But soldiers say the military is reneging on 10-year-old agreements and imposing severe financial hardship on veterans whose only mistake was to accept bonuses offered when the Pentagon needed to fill the ranks.

“These bonuses were used to keep people in,” said Christopher Van Meter, a 42-year-old former Army captain and Iraq veteran from Manteca, Calif., who says he refinanced his home mortgage to repay $25,000 in reenlistment bonuses and $21,000 in student loan repayments that the Army says he should not have received. “People like me just got screwed.”
Link
Nice, huh? I wonder what they are doing about "Gold Star" soldiers.

Carl

donquixote99 10-22-2016 06:59 PM

Interesting question. Likewise, do you get some credit if you got some part or parts blown off?

Total crock. They took the money in good faith.

Pio1980 10-22-2016 07:19 PM

The reasons this happened aren't dissimilar to WF pressure to recruit new accounts. The perpetrators of the pressure are imo accountable.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

nailer 10-23-2016 04:08 AM

Our elected leaders?

merrylander 10-23-2016 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlV (Post 334278)
I guess that could become a standard phrase. Anyway, this how we take care of our own. Sad.



Nice, huh? I wonder what they are doing about "Gold Star" soldiers.

Carl

No doubt they will go after the parents, we really need to kick out the Secretary of the Army, in addition to being a misogynist he now is just plain mean.

Pio1980 10-23-2016 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nailer (Post 334302)
Our elected leaders?

No, the unelected appointed leaders that applied the pressure thru unrealistic goal setting.


Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

nailer 10-23-2016 09:46 AM

Fielding the ground forces required once the nationalistic popularity of the war had worn away was not an easy task. A professional military is the cause of this abuse of soldiers no longer needed and abusing no longer needed soldiers is an American tradition.

Pio1980 10-23-2016 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nailer (Post 334312)
Fielding the ground forces required once the nationalistic popularity of the war had worn away was not an easy task. A professional military is the cause of this abuse of soldiers no longer needed and abusing no longer needed soldiers is an American tradition.

Part of the cost not accounted in warhawking without forsight.
I never had to suffer for being a vet, either by being the symbol of sombodies' 'something', or by Conservative cost cutting (other then Graham-Rudman under Reagan reneging on dental care). I accept the hearing aids and Tricare as a sort of apology.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

donquixote99 10-23-2016 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pio1980 (Post 334309)
No, the unelected appointed leaders that applied the pressure thru unrealistic goal setting.


Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

It must be noted that the unelected, appointed Secretary of the Army serves at the pleasure of the President.

sheltiedave 10-23-2016 10:47 AM

This is fraud, committed knowingly and with forethought, by the Guard recruiters.

As former military, I know the conditions these veterans served in, and the sacrifices they made because they honorably committed to a contract in order to gain a financial advantage at the beginning of their reenlistment period. They should be able to retain the paid bonuses.

Visiting financial ruin upon vets who honorably served is Kafkaesque, immoral, and an example of a military without a mind.

Oh, you served in Afghanistan and/or Iraq, and you survived? Congratulations, now return that bonus.

Rajoo 10-23-2016 10:48 AM

Penny wise, pound foolishness is a trait of people in authority incapable of managing large sums of money, like the top brass at the Pentagon.

Zeke 10-23-2016 12:18 PM

Discovered to be a true bait and switch?

Enlistees should keep the $$$.

Pio1980 10-23-2016 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rajoo (Post 334317)
Penny wise, pound foolishness is a trait of people in authority incapable of managing large sums of money, like the top brass at the Pentagon.

I dunno that they "manage" as much as just hand it over to crony contractors.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Dondilion 10-23-2016 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sheltiedave (Post 334316)
This is fraud, committed knowingly and with forethought, by the Guard recruiters.

As former military, I know the conditions these veterans served in, and the sacrifices they made because they honorably committed to a contract in order to gain a financial advantage at the beginning of their reenlistment period. They should be able to retain the paid bonuses.

Visiting financial ruin upon vets who honorably served is Kafkaesque, immoral, and an example of a military without a mind.

Oh, you served in Afghanistan and/or Iraq, and you survived? Congratulations, now return that bonus.



The real irony is that like the Soviet "Afghantsi" they served for nothing.

merrylander 10-23-2016 03:46 PM

Government is quite good at this sort of thing. The verdict against us was remanded Sept 8- still waiting to see any check. Asshole went on vacation, maybe he will be back Monday

Oerets 10-25-2016 03:54 PM

More coming out about this. Seems a few at the top of the National Guard destroyed thousands of files in order to hinder prosecution. Let those who served keep the money, they fulfilled their part. They are not the ones who committed fraud, the ones in charge were. Make them pay it back!



Barney

merrylander 10-26-2016 07:32 AM

It is hitting the fan in Congress so maybe they will do summat to stop this nonsense.

This Sunday is the National Day of Remembrance for all the Cold War Patriots, those who gave their lives in the service of this country..

CarlV 10-27-2016 09:03 PM

Looks like it was too close to election time for the scumbags in Congress to obstruct and had to actually take action on something. Oh the humanity.Or is it Hannity, or maybe Manatee? :eek:

Carl

donquixote99 10-27-2016 09:26 PM

Did Congress have anything to do with it? I understand the Army has halted collection action and will review everything next year. That's executive branch.

CarlV 10-27-2016 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donquixote99 (Post 334595)
Did Congress have anything to do with it? I understand the Army has halted collection action and will review everything next year. That's executive branch.



The California National Guard offered bonuses of $15,000 or more for people who enlisted at the height of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon worked Wednesday to stave off a public relations nightmare, suspending efforts to force California National Guard troops who served in Iraq and Afghanistan to repay their enlistment bonuses that may have been improperly awarded.

Defense Secretary Ash Carter ordered the suspension in the wake of angry reaction from congressional Republicans and Democrats. They demanded he relieve the burden on Guard members following news reports that soldiers were asked to repay bonuses that in some cases totaled more than $25,000.


The announcement does not end the reimbursement process, but postpones collection efforts while the Pentagon and Congress look for a long-term solution.
Link


Carl

Pio1980 10-27-2016 10:05 PM

This should have never burdened those who signed on and served in good faith. In the grand scheme of military budgeting, this is chump change and should be restored and forgotton, with liability assigned upstairs where the offer and pressure originated.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

CarlV 10-27-2016 10:23 PM

Those who offered these unauthorized signing bonuses should be fired and then prosecuted, just like those in Wells Fargo need to be. Why is it in government/military those in charge take the blame but on Wall St. the CEO's are treated like royalty and given bonuses for their criminal acts?

Carl


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.