![]() |
DNC Chair Schultz Loses Speaking Spot at Convention
(CNN) — The head of the Democratic National Committee will not speak at the party's convention next week, a decision reached by party officials Saturday after emails surfaced that raised questions about the committee's impartiality during the Democratic primary.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, whose stewardship of the DNC has been under fire through most of the presidential primary process, will not have a major speaking role in an effort "to keep the peace" in the party, a Democrat familiar with the decision said. The revelation comes following the release of nearly 20,000 emails. CNN http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politi...ileaks-emails/ |
Are the rigging allegations official then for her hide out during the convention? She should resign and go back to Florida.
|
Florida does not want her! (at least I do not)
|
It is hard to believe they are that stupid not to figure out that she really can cost them this election......
Carl |
And it is the fault of the Russians. :D
|
Quote:
|
If more people had voted for Sanders he would have been the candidate.
|
Quote:
Carl |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
People who liked Bernie, like me, didn't pony up because ultimately he is unelectable as a Democrat.
Republicans, otoh, have proven to operate with a much lower set of realistic standards for nomination. Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Trump is simply availing himself to these and wait till the campaign is in full swing. And try not to put the guilt trip on Bernie supporters if Hillary does not win nor gets badly bruised by Trump. Hillary with the collusion of the DNC asked for it. |
I admire your devotion, but the stakes are too high to risk backing someone I like, also running on promises that can't be kept.
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk |
Quote:
Feel free to vote for Trump if that will mitigate your anger. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not good for democracy either. |
Like it or not (I do not), the Golden Rule tends to dominate politics for its own benefit. Oversight by an incorruptable agency with the power to enforce sensible rules of conduct is the answer, if it can be instituted. Backing candidates who haven't a practical plan or the power to bring one forth is not.
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
At this time, you are fighting the wrong fight. |
Quote:
And I thought you knew that, as a good bolshevik, I don't want what's good for democracy. That should be obvious. |
Quote:
|
Come on really, people are shocked and upset to learn, thinking the system is fair only to learn is not? Favors one candidate over another. Just where have you been.
Just more red meat to feed the distractions from the issues! To try and divide the Democrats and cause unrest. The GOP hates DWS and wants to shut her up. Especially right now with the national spot light on the convention. Nothing to see hear, move on.... Barney |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Clintonistas are anxious to move on. :D
|
Quote:
Like the name Shrillary - obviously Raj has never listened to Bernie on the trail - and that Brooklyn accent does not help.:) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Bernie got his pound of flesh. I wonder if the 'Fart In' is back on the agenda, tho. ;)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I see they've replaced the mop head with someone named Fudge. That's appropriate.
And a guy named Earnest doing the PR. You can't make this stuff up. What's next, a surprise candidate swoops in named Major Trustworthy? |
Breaking News. Schultz is resigning after the convention. Will it be enough?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.