Ma Tries to Kill Trump
 

Let's see how long it takes before someone suggests this guy is a hero.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...-trump-n595876

I thought lefties weren't violent protesters. :confused:

Ma tried to kill him?

Ma who?

Ma Barker?

http://i843.photobucket.com/albums/z...91_634x930.jpg

Where in the article does it say that this kid is a leftie? Was John Hinkley a leftie? Arthur Bremer?

You are just a cheap shot artist. This is barely an adult from the UK and has been in the US only for about a year. He probably did not even know how to shoot. How does that make him left wing?

He's no hero. Heroes don't get captured.:p

- Donald J. Trump

He's undoubtedly a radical Islamic terrorist.

Naw, he's an Anglican. ;)

Oh. Mentally ill, then.

Typos suck... :D

I am rather surprised that it has taken this long for someone to attempt this.

However, the incident reminds me a bit of the Herschel Grynszpan case. He was 17 when he killed Ernst vom Rath.

They'd be doing the GOP a favor, finally offering them an opportunity to put forth a reasonable candidate.

Does the GOP have a reasonable candidate?:)

How about a "more reasonable candidate?"


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ted Cruz, he still has high hopes to 'steal' the nomination. :)

Highly doubt that will happen.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Like the preacher who praised the murders in Orlando, criticizing the murderer only because he didn't finish the job. Is that the kind of hero worship that you are talking about.

See how easy is is to take horrific examples and use them to bolster your talking points. Is this your idea of dialogue?

No, but it is apparently yours. :rolleyes:

OK here's some dialogue. Let's see if we can agree that it is wrong to kill someone because of what he or she says; and it is wrong to kill someone because of whom he or she loves.

Can anyone agree that it is wrong to kill someone because of what he or she says; and it is wrong to kill someone because of whom he or she loves. :confused:

I don't know if the two equate under all circumstances. The instigator of the Rwandan massacre comes to mind. Then there's the Serbian /Bosnian affair.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

I thought you were being rhetorical. Everyone here would say yes to that. Frankly, I think you're setting the bar pretty fucking low, even for whell.

Anyway he was just trying to point out that "lefties" were no better than people like him. See, anyone who took it into his head to kill Trump would have to be a politically-motivated "lefty", just all the gay Americans buying guns are "lefties" and not just scared shitless human beings.

No argument here.

I was not implying that I would condone his being killed but given the state of affairs as they are currently it would not surprise me.

I'd like to be noble and give the ideal answer, but there are folks the world would be better without. I've given a couple examples in my previous response. Equating an internet radical Jihadi recruiter to a same sex couple for an ethical equivalency for instance doesn't cut it in reality.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk