Return of the Inquisition
 

The climate change scam continues. It threatens to destroy the economies of the world and produce a world like that in the novel 1984, worse than North Korea. Some of the Demokkkrats (communists) are even trying to bring back the inquisition.

16 Democrat AGs Begin Inquisition Against ‘Climate Change Disbelievers’
http://www.globalclimatescam.com/al-...-disbelievers/

http://www.climatechangedispatch.com...ming-scam.html

Scientist Confesses: "Global Warming a $22 Billion Scam"
http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/MKTNe.../17/id/607827/

What is your occupation? Clown?

Removed solicitation. Please read the forum rules.

Mod.

Welcome to PoliticalChat

Climate change is a fact, nothing else. Okay then...

Its a lie. Read the links.

Please meet me in Room 101...I have a poster of Hillary I will give you...

That little bit right there tells me everything I need to know about the quality of your thinking, and of any sources you choose to cite.

Welcome Troll.

Denier - come to Audiokarma. We have a wonderful game thread over there, tybrad started it, it is very popular and funny, why don't you join this game? The name of the thread is "The Lies Upon Lies Game". You will love it!

Here's an excellent forum to help people understand the damage the communists are trying to do with the climate change scam.

http://www.theamericanright.com/foru...Global-Warming

Left wing hallucinogen users might be shocked by this.

Owsley was a denier

quote:
There, Mr. Stanley became a jewelry sculptor and sold his ceramic and metal creations online in recent years from a website packed with essays denying global warming and espousing his metaphysical and dietary theories.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...281851194.html

http://www.climatedepot.com/2011/03/...was-a-skeptic/

High time to quit the show, you nutcase!

If we denounce him, it just 'proves' how insane or evil we are, to him. Just let him be.

Okay then - let us remind of a good old Audiokarma saying:

DON'T FEED THE TROLL

Do you trust the scientific opinion of s '60s acid burnout more than that of the global scientific community? Do you espouse metaphysical and dietary theories too? What were Owlsley academic credentials?

Sorry, I don't click on links posted by wingnuts who read World Nut Daily.
Care to summarize?

Do you always insult your liberal friends like that?

Owlsley was a total burn out. You brought him up.

http://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/c...ilitary/killed
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/1...n_4102855.html


Nice, huh?


Carl

Environmental connection?

Nah, besides mine's all factual and stuff so I reckon it doesn't belong in this thread.:)


Carl

If he agreed with your insanity, you would call him a genius.

Dominic Lawson: Democrat fingerprints are all over the financial crisis
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion...is-949653.html

How the Democrats Created the Financial Crisis: Kevin Hassett
http://www.aei.org/publication/how-t...ancial-crisis/

Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.
Poison gas and biological weapons were found in Iraq. Sadam used poison gas on the Kurds and against Iran."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002



"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

denier your mom is calling you home for milk and cookies!

14 quotes in one message. Denier can barely type a sentence of his own, but you have to give him credit. He's a believer, and he's in here fighting , the best way he can.

I'm even willing to say that part* of what he thinks he knows is true. Which is more than he will say about me. He think I'm evil and out to destroy the human race.

That, of course, is not part of the true part....



* no estimate of size of part specified

Climate Refugees, Not Found

In 2005, the U.N. Environment Program (UNEP) published a color-coded map under the headline "Fifty million climate refugees by 2010." The primary source for the prediction was a 2005 paper by environmental scientist Norman Myers.

Six years later, this flood of refugees is nowhere to be found, global average temperatures are about where they were when the prediction was made and the U.N. has done a vanishing act of its own, wiping the inconvenient map from its servers.

The map, which can still be found elsewhere on the Web, disappeared from the program's site sometime after April 11, when Gavin Atkins asked on AsianCorrespondent.com: "What happened to the climate refugees?" It's now 2011 and, as Mr. Atkins points out, many of the locales that the map identified as likely sources of climate refugees are "not only not losing people, they are actually among the fastest growing regions in the world."

View the UNEP's climate-refugee prediction map .The program's spokesman tells us the map vanished because "it's not a UNEP prediction. . . . that graphic did not represent UNEP views and was an oversimplification of UNEP views." He added that the program would like to publish a clarification, now that journalists are "making hay of it," except that the staffers able to do so are "all on holiday for Easter."

The climate-refugee prediction isn't the first global warming-related claim that has turned out to be laughable, and everyone can make mistakes. More troubling is the impulse among some advocates of global warming alarmism to assert in the face of contrary evidence that they never said what they definitely said before the evidence went against them.

These columns have asked for some time how anyone can still manage to take the U.N.-led climate crowd seriously. Maybe the more pertinent question is whether the climateers have ever taken the public's intelligence seriously.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...ooglenews_wsj#

Left wing radicals are evil. They're trying to exterminate the entire human race and are destroying the planet. They're all racists, too.

Bill Nye, ‘The Jail-The-Skeptics Guy!’: Nye entertains idea of jailing climate skeptics for ‘affecting my quality of life’ (Exclusive Video)

Read more: http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/04/...#ixzz46JonWDzh

I'd rather we used the French solution. ;)

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...AMo8VliAhW2EJg

Denier you are a lousy clown. Go back to school, and learn your lessons! Until then - just keep quiet!

Concerned spepper • 6 days ago

The evidence shows that not only are these folks forcing over $1T per year on AGW related action, they are killing jobs, killing our quality of life (in 2014 over 40,000 people died from cold weather in Europe due to energy poverty caused by solar and wind expenditures and subsidies), killing 3rd world growth due to lack of cost-effective energy (millions die each year in Africa), but all of this will not make a measureable difference in our climate and climate change. In addition, these AGW folks have illegally modified the real data to reinforce their position. The real scientific data shows that we have had an 18+ year pause in global warming, area of sea ice is back to where it was in 1980, the sun is at the lowest activity level in over 100 years, and very reputable scientists and NOAA believe that we have entered an extended (40 to 60 years) cooling period for the world.

If this occurs, is it acceptable that these global warming activists be jailed for purposely misleading us to acting on warming when it really becomes cooling?



http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/04/...#ixzz46JonWDzh

http://www.audiokarma.org/forums/sty...ilies/blah.gif



Carl

Would someone please explain why you all are talking to a unit of textile measurement?

Good to see you, Merrylander!!

Well that went well.. :grin:

And that's what happens when there's full on confrontation and little discussion.. There is undoubtably a political engine inside the GW movement. And EVERYONE can play politics. But THIS topic is a lot more interesting when you find out how little folks actually know about the science and how the media has tortured and skewed this issue.

Unless you're willing to defend message 1 in this topic, don't posture and act like there's high ground for you here. You're smarter than Denier, but if you think anything can be discussed with him, you're not so much smarter....

Just because little folks know about global warming doesn't make it any less valid. Do you only listen to tall people?