![]() |
The Beginning of the End for Hillary
|
Ominous: The FBI was mad that Petraeus got off so lightly - though his was an egregious example.
Is the FBI going to use his fat to fry Clinton? |
Quote:
Either way. It looks like this one is rapidly approaching critical mass. If the FBI recommends indictment and she is not indicted it will still cause her campaign to spontaneously combust and I will have a permanent smile on my face for at least two years straight. |
Pagliano better have some top notch protective custody or he'll end up like Vince Foster.
|
I hope this puts Hillary on a rocket train to hell! May she crash and burn.
Then it would be Sanders and Trump. I think Trump would have a very difficult time against him. |
Quote:
|
You guys forget that if they knock Hillary out then there is nothing stopping America's Dad, Joe Biden, from stepping in. You ever hear Joe address a crowd? Didn't think so, it will then be game over.
Carl |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I'm not understanding how mishandling information can be criminal unless she had criminal intent. Otherwise it was simply and accident or ignorance.
Nobody is perfect. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Justice Department has granted immunity to a former State Department staffer, who worked on Hillary Clinton’s private email server, as part of a criminal investigation into the possible mishandling of classified information, according to a senior law enforcement official. This is no laughing matter for Hillary's campaign, despite her constant cackling when asked about it. |
To Republicans she is guilty until proven innocent just like their Benghazi farce. Their 11 hours of badgering couldn't even begin to ruffle her feathers.
Carl |
Quote:
|
Point taken. I was trying to point out that nobody's going to ruffle her feathers. Me, I want to see Biden run. :)
Carl |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Meh.
1. Nothing here. 2. Too easy. 3. I've seen it many times. A desperate prosecution gives immunity to a star witness believing they hold key information. Said star witness either confirms there was nothing there (ruining the case) or falls on their sword without threat of prosecution (ruining the case). Either way, the trail stops. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Relieved?;) |
An imaginative bumper sticker. Should sell like hot cakes then. :D
http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NjAwWDE2MD..._id=880000500F I really doubt she will get indicted though unless they have a real case of wrongdoing, in which case this is taking way too long. More to do with politics than government secrets. |
I know this sounds naïve but I honestly think if Hillary knew herself that there was a smoking gun on her server she would not run. You clowns have to remember she broke an Obama administrative rule about having a private server.
yes I mean you clown;) |
They never proved anything about Benghazi. That whole thing was a silly witch hunt. This is about the e-mails, a separate issue. And, even though the investigation of her emails is on, an investigation is not proof of guilt. It simply means she is being investigated. There is still no "proof".
See, this is the trick. Political strategists are smart enough to know that all they have to do is launch an investigation or hold hearings and politically biased, nitwit Americans will assume guilt. Until the investigation is concluded, they still have nothing but a hunch. I have a hunch, but my hunch is meaningless. You don't put people in jail without solid proof.....as per the United States Constitution. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
UPDATED I think you're being quite naive about the lure of power and the arrogance of the powerful. It's very easy for me to believe that Hillary (or anyone who has wielded power for a long time) to think they could just balls this thing out until everyone gave up. And remember all those Bush hacks in key positions that broke with tradition by refusing to resign when Obama was elected? They're still there, Robbin, just waiting for their chance. And some of them are still in State and DoJ. The worst part of this is that, if there is something for the FBI to sink their teeth into, we're fucked. The other shoe will drop after the Convention, Hillary will be the Democratic nominee and Trump will be our next president. Or Cruz. Also, it's not about the mere existence of the private server or the possibility that Hillary went against an Administration policy. After all, Powell and Rice had private servers too. All those arguments are just deflections from the real problem. The real problem is the fact that we're in a political climate where the Republicans and their operatives in and out of government will move heaven and earth do destroy their opponents. And these people have been after Hillary's scalp for a quarter century and now they smell blood because, for the first time, they have something tangible. It's also about what's on her server and whether it constitutes a breach of security. Sure, there might have been similar problems with Rice's or Powell's server but nobody looked. They're looking now. I think the final outcome will be that there will be no indictment but there will be a report that paints Hillary as being so arrogant, so reckless and so uncooperative that it will be more than enough to destroy her chances. This is actually the worst possible outcome for Hillary. If she's indicted, she can win in court but, if she's not indicted yet the report condemns her competence and professionalism, she can never win and never live it down. And, no matter when the report comes out, either before or after the Convention, she won't drop out. She'll try to guts it out and she will lose. We can only hope that she loses to Sanders and not Trump or Cruz. |
Quote:
Barney |
Even without the email scandal she has major credibility and trust issues.
Every time a poll is done it shows that the majority think she is dishonest and untrustworthy. There are scores of Bernie supporters claiming they will not vote for her; I believe it's called "Bernie or Bust" Trump on the other hand is gaining more and more steam as a populist and he won't shy away from mentioning every last detail of every last scandal the Clinton's have been involved in over the years. She's in real trouble. Time to ramp up the old reliable DNC voter fraud machine. |
Quote:
The politician now becomes someone who is pretty close to you. Someone whom you know for a long time and just would not do that...is to smart etc. |
N.o.t.h.i.n.g.b.u.r.g.e.r. as always.
Yes Finn, I read the article when it came out yesterday. :rolleyes: |
This is going to be fun to watch.
|
Quote:
One is a near certainty especially if Dems continue to support Drumpf, just a hope on Hillary. I will continue to support Trump. |
Quote:
Who is Drumpf? I see a lot of moonbats spelling it like that thinking they're being clever. I guess you'd also have to call Obama by his real name too, Barry Sotoro. |
|
Quote:
Unless it can be proven that she acted as a double agent and willfully and maliciously gave or sold state secrets to a foreign government then no crime was committed. |
Quote:
She broke multiple laws. U.S. Code § 793 – Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information U.S. Code § 1924 – Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material U.S. Code § 641 – Public money, property or records U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees U.S. Code § 1519 — Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations There are others that have been cited. |
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrlD5LiSGTM |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Too fucking bad! 68 years old an still thinking like a stoned 20 year college kid? WTF is wrong with you? Shut your ignorant fucking piehole and look up the statues! |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.