|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
11-08-2012, 03:24 PM
|
|
Reformed Know-Nothing
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,908
|
|
Can the GOP expand its base?
All the talk about Romney's defeat points mostly to demographics (lack of support from Hispanics, blacks, females, gays, youth).
Currently, the GOP base (other than corporate CEO's) is made up of evangelicals, older whites, and southern men.
How can the GOP appeal to females if support of women's health issues loses the Evangelicals? Similarly, how can they appeal to Hispanics if it'll alienate the nativists in their base? They have plenty of policy positions, not to mention unsavory rhetoric, which are highly appealing to their base while being highly objectionable to blacks, gays and young folks.
How do they make converts among these groups while they're at the same time making them the brunt of their red-meat rhetoric? It seems to me that have to make inroads with these groups, but how do they do it without losing their reliable evangelical and southern base?
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
|
11-08-2012, 03:45 PM
|
|
Loyal Opposition
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
All the talk about Romney's defeat points mostly to demographics (lack of support from Hispanics, blacks, females, gays, youth).
Currently, the GOP base (other than corporate CEO's) is made up of evangelicals, older whites, and southern men.
How can the GOP appeal to females if support of women's health issues loses the Evangelicals? Similarly, how can they appeal to Hispanics if it'll alienate the nativists in their base? They have plenty of policy positions, not to mention unsavory rhetoric, which are highly appealing to their base while being highly objectionable to blacks, gays and young folks.
How do they make converts among these groups while they're at the same time making them the brunt of their red-meat rhetoric? It seems to me that have to make inroads with these groups, but how do they do it without losing their reliable evangelical and southern base?
|
Their unholy alliance with the evangelicals was a deal with the devil so to speak.
Regards,
D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
|
11-08-2012, 04:10 PM
|
|
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,222
|
|
Give the evangelicals their very own Eastern Diamondback, one for each.
|
11-08-2012, 04:13 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,211
|
|
Just was talking to my Tbagger family members today about this very subject. I asked them what they were gonna do when the GOP changes it stand on immigration,abortion along with other issues to try and reclaim voters. They both said "that not going to happen, the problem was they were not conservative enough"!
When my sister stated "Obama is a So************************ts and going to stay in power now and forever ". I kinda lost it and told her "he could be more of a So************************ts and I would be happy". To this she then told me "Why don't you just move to another country". I laughed and said back "I have as much right to this country as you"!
Thanksgiving going to be fun this year, that is if I get an invitation!
Barney
|
11-08-2012, 04:15 PM
|
|
Area Man
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
|
|
Only if we start letting the mentally ill and convicted felons vote.
Regards,
Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
|
11-08-2012, 04:23 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,223
|
|
There is an easy way for the GOP to expand its base. They could talk to voters like adults instead of scaring them while giggling behind the curtain.
__________________
People like stories.
|
11-08-2012, 04:24 PM
|
|
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,222
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerets
Just was talking to my Tbagger family members today about this very subject. I asked them what they were gonna do when the GOP changes it stand on immigration,abortion along with other issues to try and reclaim voters. They both said "that not going to happen, the problem was they were not conservative enough"!
When my sister stated "Obama is a So************************ts and going to stay in power now and forever ". I kinda lost it and told her "he could be more of a So************************ts and I would be happy". To this she then told me "Why don't you just move to another country". I laughed and said back "I have as much right to this country as you"!
Thanksgiving going to be fun this year, that is if I get an invitation!
Barney
|
Spoof 'em Barney. Tell them you have it on good authority that Obama is canceling Thanksgiving & Christmas this year to stop the teabagger House from driving over the cliff.
|
11-08-2012, 04:24 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Diego California
Posts: 3,261
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
All the talk about Romney's defeat points mostly to demographics (lack of support from Hispanics, blacks, females, gays, youth).
Currently, the GOP base (other than corporate CEO's) is made up of evangelicals, older whites, and southern men.
How can the GOP appeal to females if support of women's health issues loses the Evangelicals? Similarly, how can they appeal to Hispanics if it'll alienate the nativists in their base? They have plenty of policy positions, not to mention unsavory rhetoric, which are highly appealing to their base while being highly objectionable to blacks, gays and young folks.
How do they make converts among these groups while they're at the same time making them the brunt of their red-meat rhetoric? It seems to me that have to make inroads with these groups, but how do they do it without losing their reliable evangelical and southern base?
|
If the democrats swing too far left, then the GOP has a chance. Personally, I'd like to see a third party composed of members from both sides. That, unfortunately, is not likely to happen. This election was close and could have went the other way despite the supposed "mandate" the DailyKos claims. One must also consider the uniqueness of Obama being the first black president and what effect that had on the election. The GOP's best hope is getting more of the hispanic vote since I can't envision the other polar issue groups switching sides anytime soon. Furthermore, as much as I disdain the religious right, they must be at least placated, but remain within the GOP.
__________________
Dear Optimist: Unless life gives you water and sugar too, your lemonade will suck.
|
11-08-2012, 04:27 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego via Vermilion Ohio and Points Between
Posts: 11,538
|
|
Actually I would look to see a party come in from the left rather than the right. In other words Obama may have co-opted the moderate GOP into a Centrist Democratic Coalition that someone who in the 1970s would be a considered a moderate/liberal Republican would feel very comfortable in.
__________________
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.
|
11-08-2012, 04:48 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,223
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhunter
If the democrats swing too far left, then the GOP has a chance. Personally, I'd like to see a third party composed of members from both sides. That, unfortunately, is not likely to happen. This election was close and could have went the other way despite the supposed "mandate" the DailyKos claims. One must also consider the uniqueness of Obama being the first black president and what effect that had on the election. The GOP's best hope is getting more of the hispanic vote since I can't envision the other polar issue groups switching sides anytime soon. Furthermore, as much as I disdain the religious right, they must be at least placated, but remain within the GOP.
|
bhunter,
Have you considered that placating the right is part of the problem? I think at some point the voters need to be reminded that change is incremental. Fox News placated the hell out of them until they crystallized into a mass on the far right. By far right I mean a mass that thinks they want extreme social stratification. Sure some of them do, but not all. I would guess not even a majority.
It's been years since I've heard words like moral hazard, community, states rights, religious tolerance, etc. come from either voters or politicians in the GOP majority. Their vocabulary since the neocon takeover in 2000 has been narrowed to mo' money is mo' better.
During the Reagan era the richest guy in the world was worth $2B and happy. Today $2B will only get a rich guy a bleacher seat at Forbe's and they are pissed at Rove for not persuading voters to sell out more federal government.
The GOP has crossed a line of decency. It might be a blurry line and we not all agree where it is, but the fact is they have managed to lose traditional white Republicans like myself.
Old man Bush might have dirty laundry, but at least he had the courage to call the Laffer Curve voodoo economics. I would like to think that he had workers best interest in mind when he said that. The modern GOP concern for workers has flat disappeared. Instead they are more focused on placating workers. And it's failing them.
__________________
People like stories.
Last edited by ebacon; 11-08-2012 at 04:52 PM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 AM.
|