Unintended Consequences in Litter Control?

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by djv8ga

We make the Chicks do it.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=897_1309398287

Locked down in 138 degree tents? That fat f**kin pig needs some of his own medicine.

"Inmates volunteer for the chain gang, but not because they like the work. They are trying to stay out of lock down."

"It's hotter in the tents than it is outside. The Sheriff says he's doing the women a favor."

"It's only 113 today. In the tents..138 yesterday, so they are cooling off by being here," he said."
Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=897_1...8L6tZlovF8F.99

[donquixote99]

Eye for an eye for Sheriff Joe naturally sounds good--but it's also implicitly says it's OK to be cruel to someone 'if they deserve it.'

138-degree tents are cruelty, no matter who is in them. And cruelty is evil. Always.

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Eye for an eye for Sheriff Joe naturally sounds good--but it's also implicitly says it's OK to be cruel to someone 'if they deserve it.'

138-degree tents are cruelty, no matter who is in them. And cruelty is evil. Always.

Agreed.

The horror isn't that a monster like Arpaio exists. It's that he and his methods are immensely popular among a large segment of our society.

John

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Boreas

Agreed.

The horror isn't that a monster like Arpaio exists. It's that he and his methods are immensely popular among a large segment of our society.

John

For the most part, the same people who support "enhanced interrogation." Feckin' Nazi-wannabees.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

138-degree tents are cruelty, no matter who is in them. And cruelty is evil. Always.

Not only cruel, but dangerous.

If someone dies of heat stroke in one Sheriff Joe should be facing murder charges.

[Wasillaguy]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

Not only cruel, but dangerous.

If someone dies of heat stroke in one Sheriff Joe should be facing murder charges.

We could just put snipers up in all the trees like you suggested for litterers, only for all crime. Explode their heads with the .50 cal and they'll never have to face the torture tents of Joe.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by Wasillaguy

We could just put snipers up in all the trees like you suggested for litterers, only for all crime. Explode their heads with the .50 cal and they'll never have to face the torture tents of Joe.

I'll decide which crimes deserve the .50 cal. solution, thank you very much.

That being said, DUI would make the cut.

So would most of the shenanigans that go on on Wall Street.

[BlueStreak]

Funny how the people who complain about abusive law enforcement ("government thugs") the most are the same ones who celebrate excessive and callous methods of Sheriff Joe (a government official).

Another fine example of rightwing hypocrisy, anyone?

Dave

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

I'll decide which crimes deserve the .50 cal. solution, thank you very much.

That being said, DUI would make the cut.

So would most of the shenanigans that go on on Wall Street.

That's some expensive ammo. We could charge the families for the bullet.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by bobabode

That's some expensive ammo. We could charge the families for the bullet.

Nah, I'm not that cruel.

We'll raise taxes on the rich to pay for those .50 caliber sniper rounds.