Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > The Auto industry

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-03-2012, 08:17 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
The auto bailout.

Gentleman George Voinovich's comments on the bailout.

This is the very same scandal-free Senator that the WSJ ravaged as not being a Republican. Interestingly he's also fromn the same Cleveland district as Kucinich.




".....Turn back the clock to 2008. As co-chairman of the auto caucus in the U.S. Senate, I advocated for government assistance to save this economically-critical industry from bankruptcy.

Together with my auto caucus co-chairman, Michigan's Democratic Sen. Carl Levin, I was front-and-center during the debate on the auto bailout and joined with other auto-state colleagues to help GM and Chrysler avoid liquidation and benefit from a structured managed bankruptcy.

.......

According to experts, regular bankruptcy was not an option because of the collapse of the credit markets and because traditional debtor-in-possession financing wasn't available. The only option would have been liquidation.

Working with my colleagues, we crafted legislation that would have provided up to $25 billion of assistance already appropriated through Section 136 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. This bill sought to protect taxpayers by including prohibitions on executive compensation, golden parachutes, dividend payments and equity stakes to share in future profits.

Unfortunately, the legislation died under objections from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Harry Reid, both Democrats, which caused panic in financial markets. This negative reaction caused congressional Democratic leaders to abandon their objections to Section 136 and join the Bush administration in developing a new plan.

I'll never forget the Tuesday, Dec. 9, 2008, Republican policy lunch when I warned my colleagues that if they voted against the compromise, the president would have to consider using the bank bailout fund for loans to automakers. It was my opinion that the president was not going to leave office being known as George "Herbert Hoover" Bush. Vice President Dick Cheney, who attended the lunches but rarely spoke, confirmed what I had told my colleagues and urged them to support the compromise.

On Dec. 10, the House approved a compromise auto bailout, but it died in the Senate at the hands of senators from right-to-work states. It was an unfortunate outcome to important bipartisan efforts designed to help a lynchpin of America's manufacturing might.

The irony is that if the Senate had approved the compromise plan, President Bush would not have had to use bank rescue funds -- known as "TARP" -- and lawmakers, not President Barack Obama, would have called the shots on the loan conditions for automakers.

In the wake of the collapse of congressional efforts, President Bush was under enormous pressure from bailout opponents to not use TARP funds to help automakers. He had to weigh the proper role of government in private enterprise versus its role in safeguarding the broader health and stability of the economy. I urged him to come down on the side of the latter.

Ultimately, the president agreed, concluding that these were not ordinary times and that if he allowed the free market to take its course, "it would almost certainly lead to disorderly bankruptcy and liquidation for the automakers."

He went on to say that "allowing the U.S. auto industry to collapse is not a responsible course of action," and that he recognized that if help was not extended, "it would leave the next president to confront the demise of a major American industry in his first days of office."

The president's final words on the auto crisis were prophetic: "By giving the auto companies a chance to restructure, we will shield the American people from a harsh economic blow at a vulnerable time. And we will give American workers an opportunity to show the world once again they can meet challenges with ingenuity and determination, and bounce back from tough times, and emerge stronger than before."

........"

http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/ind...es_credit.html

.-.-.-.-.-..-.

Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-03-2012, 09:53 AM
icenine's Avatar
icenine icenine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego via Vermilion Ohio and Points Between
Posts: 11,536
It does not matter who thought about it...it only matters who did it.
__________________
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-03-2012, 10:04 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
As in, who signed it?

Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-03-2012, 10:24 AM
icenine's Avatar
icenine icenine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego via Vermilion Ohio and Points Between
Posts: 11,536
See post #2...
__________________
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-03-2012, 10:36 AM
ebacon's Avatar
ebacon ebacon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,223
What's the point of this thread?
__________________
People like stories.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-03-2012, 11:10 AM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebacon View Post
What's the point of this thread?
Senate baaaaaad!

Bush gooooooood!

"The irony is that if the Senate had approved the compromise plan, President Bush would not have had to use bank rescue funds -- known as "TARP" -- and lawmakers, not President Barack Obama, would have called the shots on the loan conditions for automakers."

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-03-2012, 11:33 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
It's Obama's bailout?

Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-03-2012, 11:44 AM
ebacon's Avatar
ebacon ebacon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,223
I'm lost.

The thing called the "auto bailout" was actually a number of measures spread out over two year period. The first measure was the TARP money that Bush loaned to GM and Chrysler. That money included bailouts of their respective banking divisions.

After that there were the customized bankruptcies for GM and Chrysler. There was also a program to help auto suppliers. After all GM and Chrysler could not build cars without parts.

It would be disingenuous for any political party to claim they single handedly bailed out the industry. The auto indutry was in intensive care from 2008-2011 which spanned the Bush and Obama administrations.
__________________
People like stories.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-03-2012, 11:51 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
Oh I agree Obie did some things.

Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-03-2012, 12:25 PM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
But Bush created it. I see the plan that would've limited bonuses etc was shot down by Dems.

Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.