Thank You Republicans

[CarlV]

Originally Posted by Wasillaguy

White isn't a race either. References to "old white guys" includes old white Hispanics too.

Could be they don't like brown people either. You heard of Oreo referring to black people like SCOTUS Justice Thomas who always has and will continue to vote against anything that allowed him as a black man to be where is today.


Carl

[Wasillaguy]

Originally Posted by CarlV

Could be they don't like brown people either. You heard of Oreo referring to black people like SCOTUS Justice Thomas who always has and will continue to vote against anything that allowed him as a black man to be where is today.


Carl

I've heard it now.
Congratulations on keeping the color based hate speech going.

[CarlV]

IMO, I made a statement of facts and that is all. It is hardly any secret.

Just the facts on Justice Oreo.
A simple web search yields this authored by a black woman as #1 hit on my search I just did.
http://jezebel.com/clarence-thomas-i...-why-573696732

Next:
http://blackagendareport.com/content...mas-anti-black

Next:
http://www.raceandhistory.com/histor...encethomas.htm


Try a search on the subject of him yourself.

Carl

[CarlV]

OBTW, Please correct me if I'm wrong...


Carl

[Wasillaguy]

Correcting you should be left to the pros. Multiple sessions. Long term.

As for your off topic topic, I think Thomas understands his job should not see color.

[CarlV]

Originally Posted by Wasillaguy

As for your off topic topic, I think Thomas understands his job should not see color.

Please show me where he has done this.
And since when does a thread stay on topic after 2 pages? Or on the first page at AK?

Originally Posted by Wasillaguy

Correcting you should be left to the pros. Multiple sessions. Long term.

Oreo Thomas maybe, I'm good.


Carl

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by Wasillaguy

Correcting you should be left to the pros. Multiple sessions. Long term.

As for your off topic topic, I think Thomas understands his job should not see color.

Nasty snark in response to a debate challenge you cannot meet. Typical.

[Wasillaguy]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Nasty snark in response to a debate challenge you cannot meet. Typical.

What was the debate again? Whether I agree with a ranting race baiter with references to three ranting race bait articles?

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by Wasillaguy

What was the debate again? Whether I agree with a ranting race baiter with references to three ranting race bait articles?

Typical Trump asshole. Your idea of debate is to escalate the personal attacks. Carl didn't rant once, and your 'race baiters' is exactly as empty and unjustified an insult as you are convinced 'racist' always is.

As for Carl's three links, NO ONE rips Thomas for being black. The first two are pretty polemical, but they bring plently of facts to the table. You should check out some of the links contained in the first one:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...t_unusual.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parent...District_No._1
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/...ailure/265939/
http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/06/co...ination-cases/

The lawyer lady has done some homework.

The third is a perfectly sober personality analysis, no ranting at all.

As for Carl himself, your calling him a 'ranting race baiter' is a dirty smear, a rant on your part. When confronted with truth you don't like, you lash out.

[whell]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

As for Carl himself, your calling him a 'ranting race baiter' is a dirty smear, a rant on your part. When confronted with truth you don't like, you lash out.

So, Carl's use of the term "Oreo" in the context of a discussion about Clarence Thomas isn't race baiting?

Right.