The Biden Crime Family (a.k.a. "Biden is an honest guy"

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

...and Whell continues to believe every MAGA lie in their playbook. Sad!

I notice you side-stepped the question. You seem unwilling or unable to explain the significance of the article you posted, or whether its significant at all. So, I'll ask again: So what?

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by whell

I notice you side-stepped the question. You seem unwilling or unable to explain the significance of the article you posted, or whether its significant at all. So, I'll ask again: So what?

You've been sidestepping EXACTLY the same question here for months, now, regarding your MAGA pals' accusations (lies).

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

You've been sidestepping EXACTLY the same question here for months, now, regarding your MAGA pals' accusations (lies).

No, I've answered it several times, Chickie. Try again.

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by whell

No, I've answered it several times, Chickie. Try again.

Only in your world do obfuscation and deflection count as “answers”. Try again, idiot. You’re batting zero.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Only in your world do obfuscation and deflection count as “answers”. Try again, idiot. You’re batting zero.

More bullshit from you. You have no idea what you're talking about. In fact, there was a lengthy exchange recently in this forum where we discussed the difference between allegations and evidence. I've been pretty consistent in stating there is evidence that suggests that the Biden's were involved in unethical in possibly illegal activity. I also stated that I've not yet seen anything that is a "smoking gun" supporting the allegations against the Bidens.

How is that obfuscating, Chickie? Or are you simply demonstrating that you have all the intellect of a rotting turnip?

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

More bullshit from you. You have no idea what you're talking about. In fact, there was a lengthy exchange recently in this forum where we discussed the difference between allegations and evidence. I've been pretty consistent in stating there is evidence that suggests that the Biden's were involved in unethical in possibly illegal activity. I also stated that I've not yet seen anything that is a "smoking gun" supporting the allegations against the Bidens.

How is that obfuscating, Chickie? Or are you simply demonstrating that you have all the intellect of a rotting turnip?

Is that a disclaimer? Throw shit and then say I am not so sure?

On a related topic, how much of the money that Trump raised with his "Save America" PAC has actually spent on this noble (barf) cause? Or is this PAC part of his business enterprise like the Trump charity? Whatever happened to it, the charity?

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

I notice you side-stepped the question. You seem unwilling or unable to explain the significance of the article you posted, or whether its significant at all. So, I'll ask again: So what?

Before Comer’s chairmanship, Mazars had started document production and turned over a subset of documents to Oversight Committee Democrats, led by ranking Democrat Jamie Raskin (Md.). That tranche of documents showed payments by foreign governments to three Trump properties in New York, Washington and Las Vegas. Committee investigators also identified, from public records, significant spending at a fourth Trump property, Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue in New York.

“These payments were made while these governments were promoting specific foreign policy goals with the Trump Administration and even, at times, with President Trump himself, and as they were requesting specific actions from the United States to advance their own national policy objectives,” according to the 155-page report released Thursday.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ng-presidency/

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

I notice you side-stepped the question. You seem unwilling or unable to explain the significance of the article you posted, or whether its significant at all. So, I'll ask again: So what?

There’s new evidence of foreign money going to a president: Trump

On Thursday, members of the Oversight Committee finally offered actual concrete evidence of a president benefiting from an influx of foreign money. This isn’t particularly useful for the Republican impeachment effort, though: The president at issue was Donald Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...foreign-money/

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

I notice you side-stepped the question. You seem unwilling or unable to explain the significance of the article you posted, or whether its significant at all. So, I'll ask again: So what?

Here's the significance, you deliberately obtuse MAGAMoron:

The bottom line is that Republicans are trying to impeach Joe Biden over the (false) accusation that he received $40,000 from China while he was no longer a public servant. And here we learn that Trump collected more than $5 million from China during his presidency.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2024...a-scandal.html

BTW, the Constitutions emoluments clause does not have an exception for hotel owners or real estate fraudsters. Also, the documented millions that Trump received was only during the first 2 years of his presidency and only through 4 of his 500 business entities. Your boy, Comer Pyle, killed the investigation at that point, precluding the investigation of the next 2 years of Trump's grift (IOW, this ~$8million came only from Trump's first two year and thru only 4/500 Trump companies and from only 20 of the 191 nations on earth (meaning there is certainly a whole lot more)). Moreover, this also didn't include the $2 billion that Jared Kushner got from Saudi Arabia.

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Here's the significance, you deliberately obtuse MAGAMoron:

The bottom line is that Republicans are trying to impeach Joe Biden over the (false) accusation that he received $40,000 from China while he was no longer a public servant. And here we learn that Trump collected more than $5 million from China during his presidency.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2024...a-scandal.html

There is absolutely no comparison between what Biden is accused of and what Trump's company was doing while Trump was president, you obfuscating Biden spear-catcher. Bringing up the fact that Trump's business, which was earning income internationally before, during, and after Trump's presidency, is simply a way for you and others - including the fools at WaPo - is an attempt to try to draw a false moral equivalence that only the truly intellectually challenged would fall for.

Have fun with that.