Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Global political discussions
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2011, 09:03 AM
neophyte neophyte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 192
If Iran feels they need nukes, who could blame them?

I've posed this question to myself in simplistic terms in order to better understand it. One must temporarily set aside all the Christian/Islamic/Judiasm emnity for a moment in order to do so. Being an atheist, I am equally dismissive of all forms of theism, so this is effortless for me.

Let's say I live in a tough neighborhood, full of fanatics and zealots of all kinds. The guys in the three houses on the right all have shotguns, as does the one on the left, two houses over. That guy on the left moved in recently under questionable circumstances, and his best friend is the biggest bully ever. This friend provided him with his shotguns, and now he feels like he can push everybody in the neighborhood around, and out of their homes at will. This bully friend also keeps lots of really big boats in the lake that surrounds all the houses, and they are bristling with shotguns, and people well trained to use them. This is the same bunch of assholes who, along with their other friends, forced themselves into my house and occupied it for decades, but I finally managed to throw them out a few decades ago. Somehow, they think they can still impose their will on me and mine. Only now are they acting like they will leave the house right next door on my left after kicking in the door and illegally occupying their house and shooting it up for a decade or so. That was the second time in the past couple decades they pulled that shit on them, and they aren't even from around here. WTF

The people in the first two houses on the right also have shotguns, and aren't close to stable. One has groups of armed strangers coming and going at will, and they only visit to start some shit, then leave. They themselves aren't aggressive, but their visitors are bloodthirsty maniacs that try to get them to live and think like they do, don't ask me why. The other one has armed visitors of many ilks. As long as they have money and influence, they seem welcome to come squat with their shotguns, as long as they leave some there for the occupants to brandish.

Everybody in the neighborhood is fucking crazy, and seems to be spoiling for a fight. Everybody is trying to prevent me from getting a shotgun of my own. What's up with that? I'm thinking that the neighborhood ain't going to suddenly change for the better. I'm defenseless and surrounded by heavily armed and unstable nut jobs. It seems that everybody that has shotguns can tell everybody else to kiss their ass, and nobody messes with them.

I'm thinking I'd best get a shotgun of my own. Wouldn't you?

Last edited by neophyte; 12-16-2011 at 10:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2011, 09:43 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,895
I don't blame them. Beyond the defense issues noted in your post, it makes them more relevant on the world stage. I don't buy into the whole "Iran is irrational and suicidal" argument, (other than the irrationality of fundamentalist religion of any stripe). The Iranians are a very intelligent people with a keen sense of Western adventurism/colonialism in their corner of the world and I think they feel that having a nuke lessens the likelihood of further adventurism and heightens their stature among the nations of the world.

This is not to say that I'm sympathetic with them or any other Middle Eastern nation, including Israel (another holder of "illegal" nukes, BTW). It's just that looking at the world from their POV, it makes more sense for them to have nukes than it does if you look at it from our POV.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-16-2011, 10:09 AM
neophyte neophyte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
I don't blame them. Beyond the defense issues noted in your post, it makes them more relevant on the world stage. I don't buy into the whole "Iran is irrational and suicidal" argument, (other than the irrationality of fundamentalist religion of any stripe). The Iranians are a very intelligent people with a keen sense of Western adventurism/colonialism in their corner of the world and I think they feel that having a nuke lessens the likelihood of further adventurism and heightens their stature among the nations of the world.

This is not to say that I'm sympathetic with them or any other Middle Eastern nation, including Israel (another holder of "illegal" nukes, BTW). It's just that looking at the world from their POV, it makes more sense for them to have nukes than it does if you look at it from our POV.
Iran (read Persia) has been on the intellectual cutting edge for thousands of years. No amount of christian paranoia and western revisionist history can change this fact.

I mean, c'mon. They invented backgammon five thousand years ago, they can't be all bad, right?

Last edited by neophyte; 12-16-2011 at 10:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-16-2011, 11:32 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. Just one thing to add to the mix.

Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-16-2011, 11:36 AM
neophyte neophyte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete View Post
Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. Just one thing to add to the mix.

Pete
billions would argue that the USA is as well, but, on a much grander scale.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-16-2011, 11:47 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
That's fine. Though I've never heard of a country that drops food on active military actions.

Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-16-2011, 12:48 PM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
So you are worried about your neighbors and for self protection you plan on installing a 1000 tons of TNT about your house. Just pray you don't accidentally set it off cause you are going up with all the neighborhood.

Using an A or H bomb in that area means that there will be so much radioactive fallout downwind that y'all will be able to use the average citizen as a nightlight.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-16-2011, 12:55 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
I thought my neighborhood is rough. If I were you, I'd move.

Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-16-2011, 01:07 PM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
LMAO!

That's a good analogy Rob.

Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-16-2011, 01:09 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete View Post
Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. Just one thing to add to the mix.

Pete
Yep. But one man's terrorist is another freedom fighter. BTW, the State Department includes Cuba on the same list. The whole "state sponsor of terrorism" is a crock of sh!t IMHO. Beyond its paternalistic, judgmental nature, we leave off nations like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia for political reasons even if they've had more to do with terrorism than anyone else in recent times.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.

Last edited by finnbow; 12-16-2011 at 01:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.