|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
12-17-2010, 02:05 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkDefender
So they cut a single spending bill. I would have been far more impressed and actually pleased had they let the tax cuts expire.
Combine expiring tax cuts as well as reducing spending, particularly deficit spending, and I think we're getting somewhere.
|
So, you'd prefer to increase tax obligations to individuals in a shaky economy, when many folks are already having difficulty paying their bills? I'm with you on the spending comments, however. Frankly, I think it would have been possible to get both spending cuts and tax reductions, but the Repubicans continue to demonstrate that they don't know how to negotiate.
|
12-17-2010, 02:07 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal
LOL
Maybe you did not hear about the trillion we are borrowing from china to give the wealth some pocket change.
|
Yes, we're borrowing at record rates to finance our out-of-control spending. It rather disgusting, actually. Not sure how that gives anyone other than the political class "pocket change".
|
12-17-2010, 02:15 PM
|
Abby Normal
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
Yes, we're borrowing at record rates to finance our out-of-control spending. It rather disgusting, actually. Not sure how that gives anyone other than the political class "pocket change".
|
So does this mean you support the trillion dollar give away to the rich or not?
|
12-17-2010, 02:19 PM
|
Abby Normal
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
So, you'd prefer to increase tax obligations to individuals in a shaky economy,
|
absolutely
it is those not working that we need to worry about at times like this
|
12-17-2010, 04:05 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Open Border
Posts: 5,126
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
|
?...sure they did.
|
12-18-2010, 06:13 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal
So does this mean you support the trillion dollar give away to the rich or not?
|
What "give-away" are you talking about?
|
12-18-2010, 06:52 AM
|
Abby Normal
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
What "give-away" are you talking about?
|
the latest, the tax cut fiasco that deficit worried cons have no problem financing through China
|
12-18-2010, 09:00 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
|
|
Hmmm, you better explain that interesting perspective to all the Dems who voted for it.
By the way, are we financing tax cuts, or the ever increasing appetite for our government to spend money it doesn't have on pork for special interests? These special interests who then pay lobbyists fat checks so that those lobbyists can turn around and make fat campaign contributions? When you're making your class warfare / class envy accusations, don't forget to include our rich and getting richer political class.
|
12-18-2010, 09:13 AM
|
|
Resident octogenarian
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
|
|
Will Rogers was right.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
|
12-18-2010, 09:24 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander
Will Rogers was right.
|
I agree:
Will Rogers: "A fool and his money are soon elected."
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 PM.
|