80% Increase In Electric Bills?

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by whell

Never said you did. Making shit up and using circular logic to try to make your point is unbecoming. Like I said, everyone likes a good conspiracy story, I guess.

In vain I might demand logic (you lecture ME about logic?) supporting your labeliing of the report a "good conspiracy story." But you never back-up your name calling. Empty labeling is all you've got.

[merrylander]

On second thought here is a good sig line for you Mike

"Il n'y a que moi qui a toujours raison"

[whell]

Originally Posted by merrylander

BTW whell did you ever go back to your consumption chart and look at the last column?

Thinking about this over breakfast I would suggest that Matthew 7:3 would be a good sig line for whell

Yes I did. My error. Canadians are truly energy hogs. However, Canada still does get most of its electric from hydro. It still accounts for 59% of Canada's total supply, and it is damn cheap to produce.

http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/electr...359#generation

[whell]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

In vain I might demand logic (you lecture ME about logic?) supporting your labeliing of the report a "good conspiracy story." But you never back-up your name calling. Empty labeling is all you've got.

You're the one who referred me to the AJ story. I provided plenty of evidence that the facts in the AJ story were questionable, as was the conclusion drawn from those facts by AJ (and the conclusion is nothing more than a good conspiracy theory). Sorry you don't like it, but that's just the way it is.

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by whell

Yes I did. My error. Canadians are truly energy hogs. However, Canada still does get most of its electric from hydro. It still accounts for 59% of Canada's total supply, and it is damn cheap to produce.

http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/electr...359#generation

They also have the wit and wisdom to operate power companies as publicly owned not for profit organizations. As well using a common reactor design, especially one that does not require enriched uranium, saves money.

As to being energy hogs the climate has much to do with that, as I previously pointed out.

The use here of multiple high pressure reactors results in extra expense and putting power generation in the hands of private for profit corporations simply does not make sense. Getting cooperation on a power grid is like pulling teeth despite EPSA and FERC.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by whell

You're the one who referred me to the AJ story. I provided plenty of evidence that the facts in the AJ story were questionable, as was the conclusion drawn from those facts by AJ (and the conclusion is nothing more than a good conspiracy theory). Sorry you don't like it, but that's just the way it is.

So you say, but who can think you have truly provided any evidence? What is this evidence of which you speak? Only your own insistence have I seen, only the evidence of your own claim. Yet you say my logic is of the nature of a circle? I think you dizzy.

[whell]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

So you say, but who can think you have truly provided any evidence? What is this evidence of which you speak? Only your own insistence have I seen, only the evidence of your own claim. Yet you say my logic is of the nature of a circle? I think you dizzy.

I think you need remedial English.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by whell

I think you need remedial English.

I think you need remedial surgery:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELX3zDKmeFQ