I agree with Pat Robertson

[d-ray657]

Originally Posted by wgrr

I thought it was Saintorum better known as "Frothy". Just Google Santorum and see what result comes up #1.

To be fair, the "frothy" definition is a hoax.

Regards,

D-Ray

[Rex E.]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

To be fair, the "frothy" definition is a hoax.

Regards,

D-Ray

What is the hoax?

[d-ray657]

Originally Posted by Rex E.

What is the hoax?

Prank might be a better word. Or vendetta? Perverse justice? The definition was the result of a contest staged by a gay activist to define Santorum after the candidate made some particularly offensive comments about gays. In other words, the definition was made up.

Regards,

D-Ray

[bhunter]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

We are awfully close to agreement on this one, Bill. I wish I were as optimistic as you about the effects of legalizing drugs, but I'm afraid it would considerably more complicated than that. However, there has to be a more rational way with dealing with such issues than what we have been doing for the last umpteen years.

Regards,

D-Ray

Here's an excellent article on the issue. Though written in 1994, the history and absurdity of America's War on Drugs still holds. Once again, we find Progressives at the root of the move to make drugs illegal in the early 1900s. Why anyone in 2012 would want to be associated with the Progressive moniker is beyond belief. Pehaps, people may remember the few good things achieved and forget all the bad caused by that stale movement.

http://www.randybarnett.com/badtrip.htm

[Charles]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

Prank might be a better word. Or vendetta? Perverse justice? The definition was the result of a contest staged by a gay activist to define Santorum after the candidate made some particularly offensive comments about gays. In other words, the definition was made up.

Regards,

D-Ray

A most fair minded post, other than I don't see that Santorum made any comments that were particularly offensive.

Chas

[merrylander]

Except that he is up to his ears in Opus Dei. . .

[Rex E.]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

Prank might be a better word. Or vendetta? Perverse justice? The definition was the result of a contest staged by a gay activist to define Santorum after the candidate made some particularly offensive comments about gays. In other words, the definition was made up.

Regards,

D-Ray

Of course! You won't find it in Websters, that's for sure

[Bigerik]

Originally Posted by bhunter

Here's an excellent article on the issue. Though written in 1994, the history and absurdity of America's War on Drugs still holds. Once again, we find Progressives at the root of the move to make drugs illegal in the early 1900s. Why anyone in 2012 would want to be associated with the Progressive moniker is beyond belief. Pehaps, people may remember the few good things achieved and forget all the bad caused by that stale movement.

http://www.randybarnett.com/badtrip.htm

Amazing how you missed who actually pushed to start these laws. The 19th century version of big Pharma didn't want competition so they actually started it.

[Rex E.]

Originally Posted by Bigerik

Amazing how you missed who actually pushed to start these laws. The 19th century version of big Pharma didn't want competition so they actually started it.

You sure it wasn't big oil and industry with the invention of Rayon. Hard to push an expensive man made product when a better product that grow free and easy is available. Think DuPont had more to do with it than Pharma (not that they were not originally and are now fighting harder than ever)

[Bigerik]

Originally Posted by Rex E.

You sure it wasn't big oil and industry with the invention of Rayon. Hard to push an expensive man made product when a better product that grow free and easy is available. Think DuPont had more to do with it than Pharma (not that they were not originally and are now fighting harder than ever)

Two sides of the same coin. Corrupt bastards all.