Zimmerman buying more guns

[Charles]

Originally Posted by BeamOn

Lawyer: Zimmerman to ask Fla. to cover some legal costs

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...orida/2704499/

Probably why his attorneys were miffed.

I believe his wife still has pending charges as well.

Personally, I don't see as to how either Zimmerman or Kel Tec would see that this sort of publicity would be in their best interests.

Chas

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by Charles

I believe his wife still has pending charges as well.

Personally, I don't see as to how either Zimmerman or Kel Tec would see that this sort of publicity would be in their best interests.

Chas

Chas they nake firearms, nobody said they were smart.

[piece-itpete]

Originally Posted by Charles

I believe his wife still has pending charges as well.

Personally, I don't see as to how either Zimmerman or Kel Tec would see that this sort of publicity would be in their best interests.

Chas

Agreed, it's pretty tasteless after a fashion.

Pete

[Rex E.]

Originally Posted by Charles

I believe his wife still has pending charges as well.

Personally, I don't see as to how either Zimmerman or Kel Tec would see that this sort of publicity would be in their best interests.

Chas

I can see very clearly why Kel-Tek did it.

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by Charles

I believe his wife still has pending charges as well.

Personally, I don't see as to how either Zimmerman or Kel Tec would see that this sort of publicity would be in their best interests.

Chas

I can understand Kel Tec thinking it good publicity given their "target" market.

[merrylander]

The trouble is that Kel Tec's guns are just about one step up fro=m a Saturday night special

[Charles]

Originally Posted by merrylander

The trouble is that Kel Tec's guns are just about one step up fro=m a Saturday night special

I shot one once, can't remember if it was a 9MM or a 32ACP, but you're correct.

If I were of a notion to carry concealed, I'd just take my S&W Chiefs Special...at least I know it will function.

Or better yet, I'd carry my GP-100 in a sack. It's effective at a little further than 7 yds. My Python is too, it's just too expensive to use.

Chas

[d-ray657]

Originally Posted by Charles

I shot one once, can't remember if it was a 9MM or a 32ACP, but you're correct.

If I were of a notion to carry concealed, I'd just take my S&W Chiefs Special...at least I know it will function.

Or better yet, I'd carry my GP-100 in a sack. It's effective at a little further than 7 yds. My Python is too, it's just too expensive to use.

Chas

Seems to me that open carry would make more sense. If you openly carried one of those, it would likely reduce the chances of having to use it.

Regards,

D-Ray

[Charles]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

Seems to me that open carry would make more sense. If you openly carried one of those, it would likely reduce the chances of having to use it.

Regards,

D-Ray

It does make more sense.

Then, if I thought I needed to carry a weapon, I'd carry my riot gun.

Chas

[Rex E.]

Originally Posted by Charles

I shot one once, can't remember if it was a 9MM or a 32ACP, but you're correct.

If I were of a notion to carry concealed, I'd just take my S&W Chiefs Special...at least I know it will function.

Or better yet, I'd carry my GP-100 in a sack. It's effective at a little further than 7 yds. My Python is too, it's just too expensive to use.

Chas

Keep that Python in the safe.....My father favorite pistol. Glad he taught me about them. For shooting I reach for the S&W Combat 66....