|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
03-11-2014, 04:41 PM
|
|
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,175
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbara
I've never heard of a couple getting 150%. Although, the rest of your post is accurate.
|
One spouse or both will likely trigger a reduction by starting getting payments below 'full retirement age." But yes, the basic idea is Spouse A gets 100%, Spouse B gets 50%, or their own, whichever is greater.
for a bunch more detail, see http://moneyover55.about.com/od/soci...usebenefit.htm
|
03-11-2014, 04:33 PM
|
|
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,175
|
|
You never have to take Social Security. But increases in your entitlement for waiting, called 'delayed retirement credits,' stop at age 70. After that, it's simply 'use it or lose it,' every month.
Your entitlement can still go up after that, but only if you are still working and making good enough money.
Last edited by donquixote99; 03-11-2014 at 04:43 PM.
|
03-12-2014, 06:31 AM
|
|
Resident octogenarian
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99
You never have to take Social Security. But increases in your entitlement for waiting, called 'delayed retirement credits,' stop at age 70. After that, it's simply 'use it or lose it,' every month.
Your entitlement can still go up after that, but only if you are still working and making good enough money.
|
DQ that was what I thought, but I was told that I had to take it. Because I was making good money it increased every year until I retired at 73
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
|
03-12-2014, 09:32 AM
|
|
Jigsawed
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,580
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander
DQ that was what I thought, but I was told that I had to take it. Because I was making good money it increased every year until I retired at 73
|
That is clearer now.
|
03-12-2014, 09:37 AM
|
|
Jigsawed
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,580
|
|
Best wishes Babara.
BTW it is nice to live in a country that has the best medical facilities and
people.
|
03-11-2014, 05:00 PM
|
|
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,175
|
|
BTW, here's a summary of the OP (remember the OP?)
1. You can get up to six months of benefits as a lump sum, if you file for benefits up to six months after your FRA (Full Retirement Age), and ask for the benefits starting at your FRA. Your other option is to get an increased monthly amount, but no back-benefits.
2. You can get up to five years or so of benefits as a lump sum by first filing at your FRA, then suspending benefits, and then asking for all your benefits from your FRA to age 70 when you reach age 70. If you do this, you get the big lump sum, but your benefit going forward is the amount you'd have gotten if you'd started at your FRA, without any credit for waiting until age 70. This is a strategy that will make sense only under certain circumstances.
|
03-11-2014, 05:28 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,172
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99
One spouse or both will likely trigger a reduction by starting getting payments below 'full retirement age." But yes, the basic idea is Spouse A gets 100%, Spouse B gets 50%, or their own, whichever is greater.
for a bunch more detail, see http://moneyover55.about.com/od/soci...usebenefit.htm
|
Yes, that's right. I mis understood your previous post.
I've worked with the elderly for nearly twenty years and, it is not unusual for a struggling couple to divorce legally, but stay together, so they can each get their full SS benefit.
|
03-11-2014, 06:15 PM
|
|
AKA Sister Mary JJ
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Upper East Tennessee
Posts: 5,897
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbara
Yes, that's right. I mis understood your previous post.
I've worked with the elderly for nearly twenty years and, it is not unusual for a struggling couple to divorce legally, but stay together, so they can each get their full SS benefit.
|
"What a country!"
__________________
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please." (Mark Twain)
|
03-11-2014, 06:29 PM
|
|
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,237
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJIII
"What a country!"
|
Drinkin' vodka eh?
__________________
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
- Mr. Underhill
|
03-11-2014, 06:18 PM
|
|
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,175
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbara
Yes, that's right. I mis understood your previous post.
I've worked with the elderly for nearly twenty years and, it is not unusual for a struggling couple to divorce legally, but stay together, so they can each get their full SS benefit.
|
I must be missing something. If 'their full SS benefit' is greater than the 50% spousal benefit, that's what they get without divorcing, isn't it?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 AM.
|