|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
01-15-2010, 03:07 PM
|
|
Loyal Opposition
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HatchetJack
Dont know what it's about but If I had to guess, it's made by libs for libs.
They try to corrupt our kids at an early age.
|
Where you been Jack?
And I was concerned that my son's HS economics teacher corrupted him with all of that free market BS.
Regards,
D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
|
01-15-2010, 04:18 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 679
|
|
Had to go out of town yesterday, been busy at work today. Looks like
Writewing has been keeping you guys occupied lately. Makes my job easier
|
01-15-2010, 04:28 PM
|
|
Loyal Opposition
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HatchetJack
Had to go out of town yesterday, been busy at work today. Looks like
Writewing has been keeping you guys occupied lately. Makes my job easier
|
Nope, not since I took Grumpy's advice.
Regards,
D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
|
01-15-2010, 04:34 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657
Nope, not since I took Grumpy's advice.
Regards,
D-Ray
|
+1
John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
|
01-15-2010, 04:44 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 679
|
|
So you gonna pick on me again
|
01-15-2010, 04:54 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HatchetJack
So you gonna pick on me again
|
You betchum, Red Ryder!
John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
|
01-15-2010, 04:56 PM
|
|
Loyal Opposition
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HatchetJack
So you gonna pick on me again
|
C'mon, I even said something nice about Lynard Skynard.
I disagree with you much of the time, but you will face up to the opposition with out having to stick out your tongue and make a personal attack. And usually both you and the horse you rode up on can take a joke.
Regards,
D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
|
01-15-2010, 04:58 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 679
|
|
Bring it on Howdy doodies, you uns aint gonna hurt my feelings.
|
01-15-2010, 04:59 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 679
|
|
Sometimes I even listen to neel yung
|
01-15-2010, 08:23 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 462
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
I'm thinking only you can tell us what you think is odd. Then maybe we can tell you why. I'd look up what PG-13 actually means first.
And if fast food is ever proven to be as lethal, addictive and insidious as tobacco, then maybe a warning would be in order for that too.
By the way, are you a smoker?
John
|
I have two children John (now 19 and 22) so I'm familiar with the meaning of PG-13. In fact, why don't we take a look for ourselves to refresh our memories.
http://www.mpaa.org/FlmRat_Ratings.asp
"A PG-13 rating is a sterner warning by the Rating Board to parents to determine whether their children under age 13 should view the motion picture, as some material might not be suited for them. A PG-13 motion picture may go beyond the PG rating in theme, violence, nudity, sensuality, language, adult activities or other elements, but does not reach the restricted R category. The theme of the motion picture by itself will not result in a rating greater than PG-13, although depictions of activities related to a mature theme may result in a restricted rating for the motion picture. Any drug use will initially require at least a PG-13 rating. More than brief nudity will require at least a PG-13 rating, but such nudity in a PG-13 rated motion picture generally will not be sexually oriented. There may be depictions of violence in a PG-13 movie, but generally not both realistic and extreme or persistent violence. A motion picture’s single use of one of the harsher sexually-derived words, though only as an expletive, initially requires at least a PG-13 rating. More than one such expletive requires an R rating, as must even one of those words used in a sexual context. The Rating Board nevertheless may rate such a motion picture PG-13 if, based on a special vote by a two-thirds majority, the Raters feel that most American parents would believe that a PG-13 rating is appropriate because of the context or manner in which the words are used or because the use of those words in the motion picture is inconspicuous."
There you go if you needed a refresher. The rating had nothing to do with my comment by the way. Just what was in the rating description.
Shot of a long explanation the will undoubtedly fall on deaf ears here for the most part anyway, I'm just going to say this. It saddens me to see a once great nation of strong, resourceful people, slowly but surely being reduced to a nation of whiny bitches and victims.
Yes I do smoke. I particularly enjoy a fine maduro wrapper cigar. Not sure why you ask though.
RC
__________________
Not feeling stimulated yet.
Last edited by doucanoe; 01-15-2010 at 08:25 PM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 PM.
|