Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-09-2015, 11:05 PM
Tom Joad's Avatar
Tom Joad Tom Joad is offline
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 12,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroJunk View Post
I'm only 62. At 66 I would get 1959.


I paid $220,000 FICA. I haven't paid anything since 2004.
I started mine at age 65.

The amount then was $1824.

It's gone up a bit with the annual cost of living increases.

I can't remember how much I paid in.

The papers are probably in a box in one of my closets but I moved so I'm not sure where. I think the amount was $132,000. Shit that's a whole lot less than the $220,000 you paid in, but I'm getting almost as much as you back.

Sounds like you're getting screwed Dude.

Probably because the formula for calculating benefits is progressive.

And then there's the fact that they average your best 35 years and since you retired early you had a string of zeros in there.

What can I say?

Sucks to be you Dude.

__________________
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-10-2015, 04:04 PM
ZeroJunk ZeroJunk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,899
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Joad View Post
I started mine at age 65.

The amount then was $1824.

It's gone up a bit with the annual cost of living increases.

I can't remember how much I paid in.

The papers are probably in a box in one of my closets but I moved so I'm not sure where. I think the amount was $132,000. Shit that's a whole lot less than the $220,000 you paid in, but I'm getting almost as much as you back.

Sounds like you're getting screwed Dude.

Probably because the formula for calculating benefits is progressive.

And then there's the fact that they average your best 35 years and since you retired early you had a string of zeros in there.

What can I say?

Sucks to be you Dude.



That is just the way it works Tom. There was a cap on it for most of it's existence. May still be but it is way up there by comparison.

The cap was $37,800 in 1984 and went up to $84,900 in 2002. Anything above that SS was no longer taken out.

Medicare had the same cap as SS through 1990 then they took the cap off so from 1990 forward you paid Medicare on all earnings, or at least I didn't make enough to hit the cap.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-10-2015, 04:11 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroJunk View Post
That is just the way it works Tom. There was a cap on it for most of it's existence. May still be but it is way up there by comparison.

The cap was $37,800 in 1984 and went up to $84,900 in 2002. Anything above that SS was no longer taken out.

Medicare had the same cap as SS through 1990 then they took the cap off so from 1990 forward you paid Medicare on all earnings, or at least I didn't make enough to hit the cap.
And it's $118,500 now.

If we did away with the cap, Social Security would be funded until The Rapture but that'll never happen, of course.
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-10-2015, 04:32 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,145
No need to get rid of the cap. Raise it just enough.
__________________
If you Love Liberty, you must Hate Trump!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-10-2015, 04:39 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
No need to get rid of the cap. Raise it just enough.
There's method to my madness. Eliminating the cap would ensure the solvency of the system in perpetuity and also make possible an increase in benefits for retirees and the disabled and also expand Medicare coverage while making it available to everyone.
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-10-2015, 06:35 PM
ZeroJunk ZeroJunk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,899
Quote:
and the disabled
Are you talking those who are actually disabled or the 50% or so of them who have a hangnail.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-10-2015, 06:53 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,207
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroJunk View Post
Are you talking those who are actually disabled or the 50% or so of them who have a hangnail.
Friends of yours? If so, you should drop a dime on them, Zero.
__________________
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
- Mr. Underhill
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-10-2015, 08:02 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroJunk View Post
Are you talking those who are actually disabled or the 50% or so of them who have a hangnail.
You got anything besides your ass as a source for that 50%?
__________________
If you Love Liberty, you must Hate Trump!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.