Snap Shots of YOUR Republican Party, 21st Century Style

[donquixote99]

No, he leads them, which is worse.

[icenine]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...ushpmg00000009

Well trying to defend Trumpcare can be stressful on Republicans. Selling white Fruit Of The Loom underwear with fresh skidmarks might be easier.

[Pio1980]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...-reporter.html

[Pio1980]

And this from a brain surgeon, a Republican brain surgeon.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...interview.html

[Pio1980]

Bagley Cartoon: Right-Wing Conspiracy Theory - http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/532863...spiracy-theory

[Chicks]

Texas governor jokes about shooting reporters. Meanwhile, 1200 journalists have been killed worldwide since 1992.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b0df57cbfb53c8

[Chicks]

So what does Trump tweet about the Portland killings by one of his hateful supporters? Nothing. How about the despicable Montana pol who body slammed a reporter?

"Big win in Montana for Republicans!"

This idiot MUST be impeached!

[Rajoo]

It's party before people and both parties have adopted this. Big money and negative campaigning is what wins elections, not appealing to the people directly. And as along as people are content to get their news from social media and conspiracy sites, this will not change.

I very much doubt if Trump will be impeached, at best he will be corralled.
If the Republic believe that there is nothing wrong in Kushner setting up a back channel communication with Russia using their spy network, what does this say? There is yet another new low for the Trump administration.

Homeland security chief defends Kushner’s alleged proposal for ‘back channel’ to the Russians as ‘a good thing”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...story#comments

[bobabode]

"On Thursday, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) praised the recent Islamic State attack in Tehran as a “good thing” and suggested that maybe the United States should work with the militant organization.
Rohrabacher’s entire line of reasoning for why the United States should work with a militant group accused of human rights violations and war crimes like ethnic cleansing is astonishing. Here it is verbatim:

“We have recently seen an attack on Iran, and the Iranian government, the mullahs, believe that Sunni forces have attacked them. This may signal a ratcheting up of certain commitments by the United States of America. As far as I’m concerned, I just want to make this point and see what you think, isn’t it a good thing for us to have the United States finally backing up Sunnis who will attack Hezbollah and the Shiite threat to us? Isn’t that a good thing? And if so, maybe this is a Trump — maybe it’s a Trump strategy of actually supporting one group against another, considering that you have two terrorist organizations.”" ThinkProgress

https://thinkprogress.org/republican...s-a7e9382dbe1b

Too much weed? End stage 'Mad Cow Disease'? This fucking dimwitted libertarian is my rep in the house.

[Rajoo]

Someone should ask that dickwad Dana as to why 4,500 US soldiers died in the Iraq war fighting for the Shia's?