|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
09-01-2010, 10:04 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete
Let's see, invaded Iran and Kuwait, gassed his own people, had the 4th largest army in the world, threatened Suadi Arabia (why we had troops there), was a rabid student of Hitler, paid suicide bombers families, .....
Both sides knew he was a problem. But why can't you guys turn the page?
Pete
|
By September 11th all that was ancient history. As Finn said, Saddam lost the ability to do all that stuff after Desert Storm and after the UNSCOM team oversaw the destruction of his WMD.
Me, I think we really need to worry about that Temujin fellow.
John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
|
09-01-2010, 10:30 AM
|
|
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
|
|
D, I'm not one of them. If the situation now allows withdrawal for Iraq and deployment to Afghanistan that is fine - a very good thing indeed. This was Obamas call and now he owns it.
It looks like all those folks who said either this was impossible, or that Iraq should be split up, were wrong.
Come on guys, turn the page already
Being fired on every day isn't a real solution imo.
Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
|
09-01-2010, 10:33 AM
|
Abby Normal
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete
Let's see, invaded Iran and Kuwait, gassed his own people, had the 4th largest army in the world, threatened Suadi Arabia (why we had troops there), was a rabid student of Hitler, paid suicide bombers families, .....
Both sides knew he was a problem. But why can't you guys turn the page?
Pete
|
he invaded Kuwait because he believed we would allow it and it was (as with all wars) about economics. Kuwait was hurting Iraq though it's oil policies and it would not forgive the debt Iraq had incurred during it's war with Iran.
There are many countries that turn on there own that we ignore, we simply do not go to war for humanitarian reasons. It's always about the cash.
The threat of Saudi Arabia is irrelevant. Korea and Iran threaten a country daily.
Many countries fund suicide bombers, do we go to war with them?
Pete, "he was a problem"? come on, even I could do better than that.
|
09-01-2010, 11:03 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal
he invaded Kuwait because he believed we would allow it
|
He was told we would. Doe the name April Glaspie ring a bell? How about the statement,
"But we have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait. I was in the American Embassy in Kuwait during the late '60s. The instruction we had during this period was that we should express no opinion on this issue and that the issue is not associated with America. James Baker has directed our official spokesmen to emphasize this instruction. We hope you can solve this problem using any suitable methods via Klibi (Chedli Klibi, Secretary General of the Arab League) or via President Mubarak. All that we hope is that these issues are solved quickly."
Quote:
and it was (as with all wars) about economics. Kuwait was hurting Iraq though it's oil policies and it would not forgive the debt Iraq had incurred during it's war with Iran.
|
Kuwait was "slant drilling" across the border into Iraq, pumping out oil that was in sovereign Iraqi territory. There's also the territorial dispute concerning Kuwait's status as an independent state or a province of Iraq.
Quote:
Pete, "he was a problem"? come on, even I could do better than that.
|
He was a "nail". We are the "hammer".
John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Last edited by Boreas; 09-01-2010 at 11:06 AM.
|
09-01-2010, 11:27 AM
|
|
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
|
|
Yes, yes, we are the evil empirial power bent on world domination - unless a Dem is President
No comment on how I said something nice about Obama?
Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
|
09-01-2010, 11:51 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete
Yes, yes, we are the evil empirial power bent on world domination - unless a Dem is President
|
I don't know about the evil part but we are an empire and the Neo-Cons are unquestionably bent on world domination - in addition to just being bent.
John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
|
09-01-2010, 12:19 PM
|
|
Sir Lord Vader of Cheam
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lewiston, ID
Posts: 5,065
|
|
Manifest Destiny, since 1776!
__________________
"American" means calling everyone who disagrees with you a traitor?
|
09-01-2010, 12:26 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke
Manifest Destiny, since 1776!
|
Well, 1840 anyway.
John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
|
09-01-2010, 12:43 PM
|
Abby Normal
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
Kuwait was "slant drilling" across the border into Iraq, pumping out oil that was in sovereign Iraqi territory. There's also the territorial dispute concerning Kuwait's status as an independent state or a province of Iraq.
n
|
that was Saddam's assertion however it has never been determined to have been the case
but the driving reason for the invasion was Iraq's economic situation
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 PM.
|