Snap Shots of YOUR Republican Party, 21st Century Style

[bobabode]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...s-why/?hpid=z2

Apparently the 'Pubbies don't know whether to shit or go blind.

Repeal the ACA?

[finnbow]

All they're doing is showing that they have no capacity to govern, to their own detriment in 2016.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by bobabode

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ending_strip_4

Want a little feces and urine with your fries?

As the thing notes, requiring notice of non-washing constitutes regulation. His beginning admission of bias (irrational animus) against regulation is correct.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

As the thing notes, requiring notice of non-washing constitutes regulation. His beginning admission of bias (irrational animus) against regulation is correct.

Say wha? My 'Universal Translator' is on the fritz.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by finnbow

All they're doing is showing that they have no capacity to govern, to their own detriment in 2016.

Man oh man, this 114th Congress is the gift that keeps giving. Like a moldy rum soaked fruitcake way past it's 'sell by date'.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Say wha? My 'Universal Translator' is on the fritz.

Here, let me communicate clearly:

What the fuk is your problem?

[bobabode]

No probemos here Don. Just asking for clarification...got your BVDs in a twist?

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Man oh man, this 114th Congress is the gift that keeps giving. Like a moldy rum soaked fruitcake way past it's 'sell by date'.

We still have one in the fridge. Time to pitch it, I suppose. It's not worth more rum.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by bobabode

No probemos here Don. Just asking for clarification...got your BVDs in a twist?

Maybe so.

The report said the honorable Senator was OK with ending mandatory handwashing, as long as restaurants posted signs saying they didn't require it.

The author pointed out that requiring signs would be regulation. But the Senator says he doesn't want regulation. So his position is irrational.

In fact, the Senator said he was BIASED against regulation. I note that bias is 'irrational dislike*' So it's to be expected that he'd be irrational in what he wants.


* I said 'irrational animus' before. A George Will moment, I guess....

[JJIII]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

(irrational animus)

Maybe this would help...

http://www.webmd.com/digestive-disor...eases-diarrhea

Oh, wait. I read that wrong. Never mind.