Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > The Auto industry
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-22-2024, 08:07 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,174
OK, I'll buy 40,000 rpm for a turbine, but geared way down for the rotors. You were not seeing (and in particular not hearing) a thing with supersonic rotors.
__________________
If you Love Liberty, you must Hate Trump!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-23-2024, 07:47 AM
BigElCat's Avatar
BigElCat BigElCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: South of KC, Kansas
Posts: 1,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
OK, I'll buy 40,000 rpm for a turbine, but geared way down for the rotors. You were not seeing (and in particular not hearing) a thing with supersonic rotors.
It apparently had four electric motors to spin the props, on arms that were proportionally shorter than small scale quad copters.

The body (I guess you'd call it a fuselage) looked like this, except it had no side pods, only landings skids like helicopter. No windows, just four port holes in the lower front facing skin.

polar-lights_star-trek-galileo-shuttle_01.jpg

The rotors would have been spinning with the tips, or hoops, going at sub-sonic speeds.

I brought it up, because it must have had some kind of ultra light weight, high discharge, battery with pretty good range. It wasn't designed for forward speed, or a low drag co-efficient.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-23-2024, 03:18 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigElCat View Post
It apparently had four electric motors to spin the props, on arms that were proportionally shorter than small scale quad copters.

The body (I guess you'd call it a fuselage) looked like this, except it had no side pods, only landings skids like helicopter. No windows, just four port holes in the lower front facing skin.

Attachment 4245



The rotors would have been spinning with the tips, or hoops, going at sub-sonic speeds.

I brought it up, because it must have had some kind of ultra light weight, high discharge, battery with pretty good range. It wasn't designed for forward speed, or a low drag co-efficient.
OK. what had me going is that 40,000 rpm number. What you describe now would have nothing going any where near 40,000 rom.
__________________
If you Love Liberty, you must Hate Trump!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-23-2024, 07:59 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,916
Tesla says profits fell 55 percent in the first quarter to $1.13 billion while revenue declined 9 percent.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/techn...nings-outlook/
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-24-2024, 10:54 AM
BigElCat's Avatar
BigElCat BigElCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: South of KC, Kansas
Posts: 1,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
OK. what had me going is that 40,000 rpm number. What you describe now would have nothing going any where near 40,000 rom.
Bah ! One has to take what I say with a 'grain of salt'.

When folks talk about money, 40M is $40,000, not 40 million. (and this supports my argument somehow)

Guess I was talkin' about metric RPM. It made a 'whirr' noise. (grin) Minimal down draft, lots of lift.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-24-2024, 12:21 PM
Rajoo's Avatar
Rajoo Rajoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 14,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigElCat View Post
Bah ! One has to take what I say with a 'grain of salt'.

When folks talk about money, 40M is $40,000, not 40 million. (and this supports my argument somehow)

Guess I was talkin' about metric RPM. It made a 'whirr' noise. (grin) Minimal down draft, lots of lift.
Everywhere I looked, $40M is 40 Million dollars. If its $40,000 usually designated as $40K.

Also as to high rpm motors, we have a CNC that is capable of 40,000 rpm but we don't run it over 15K rpm because, at higher rpm's the torque (force required to shear metal) is greatly diminished. Also familiar with 80K rpm motors, but they are small and usually pneumatic because an air blanket is used as a bearing (no metal to metal contact and the air needs to be expunged anyway).

As to rotors capable of lift, making a bearing to handle the thrust and vibration will be a far bigger challenge.
__________________
White Christian Nationalism:
Freedom for us, order for everyone else, and violence for those who transgress.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-26-2024, 12:42 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,174
In my long ago, M was millions, and thousands were just false precision after the decimal point, as in $29.208M.
__________________
If you Love Liberty, you must Hate Trump!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-26-2024, 02:13 PM
Rajoo's Avatar
Rajoo Rajoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 14,212
^^I looked this up. "M" is a million and so is "MM", supposedly representing thousand thousand, but the logic defies me.
__________________
White Christian Nationalism:
Freedom for us, order for everyone else, and violence for those who transgress.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-27-2024, 10:35 AM
BigElCat's Avatar
BigElCat BigElCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: South of KC, Kansas
Posts: 1,445
LOL.

We probably have nano accounting these days, to go along with our fiat currencies. Decimal places too small to be seen with the naked eye.

As much as I like physical currencies, I think we should round everything off to the nearest dollar, do away with coins.

Last edited by BigElCat; 04-28-2024 at 11:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-08-2024, 01:03 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigElCat View Post
LOL.

We probably have nano accounting these days, to go along with our fiat currencies. Decimal places too small to be seen with the naked eye.

As much as I like physical currencies, I think we should round everything off to the nearest dollar, do away with coins.
Agree. Coins now too low in value to be worth the trouble to spend them.
__________________
If you Love Liberty, you must Hate Trump!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.