FAKE NEWS EXPOSED: A Service of PoliticalChat.com

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by whell

So what's the bigger story? A president who enriched himself and his family by selling influence for millions of dollars to unsavory individuals, some with connections to - among other places - Moscow and Beijing? Or 91 indictments using novel interpretations of the law to generate 91 indictments, in an effort headed up by a president who said he'd do whatever he could to influence the 2024 election?

Go figure.

Oh, and nobody but you is questioning the provenance of the laptop. Even the NY Times stated they were able to verify the authenticity of the data. The FBI reportedly verified the contents back in 2019. Or are you still buying into the now-discredited "Russian disinformation" letter from dozens of former "intel officials"?

Amusing that you actually think your propaganda will work on anyone here. Most here are better read and far smarter than you. Give it up, you disgusting idiot.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

So what's the bigger story? A president who enriched himself and his family by selling influence for millions of dollars to unsavory individuals, some with connections to - among other places - Moscow and Beijing? Or 91 indictments using novel interpretations of the law to generate 91 indictments, in an effort headed up by a president who said he'd do whatever he could to influence the 2024 election?

Go figure.

Oh, and nobody but you is questioning the provenance of the laptop. Even the NY Times stated they were able to verify the authenticity of the data. The FBI reportedly verified the contents back in 2019. Or are you still buying into the now-discredited "Russian disinformation" letter from dozens of former "intel officials"?

Except for what you say is untrue. To wit:

The vast majority of the data - and most of the nearly 129,000 emails it contained - could not be verified by either of the two security experts who reviewed the data for The Post.

Among the reasons for the inconclusive findings was sloppy handling of the data, which damaged some records. The experts found the data had been repeatedly accessed and copied by people other than Hunter Biden over nearly three years.

Most of the data obtained by The Post lacks cryptographic features that would help experts make a reliable determination of authenticity, especially in a case where the original computer and its hard drive are not available for forensic examination.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/techn...data-examined/

In other words, the vast majority (if not all)
of the laptop contents cannot withstand legal scrutiny and show considerable evidence of tampering by multiple parties.

The Trump crimes, OTOH, happened right before your eyes. Who you gonna believe- Trump or your lying eyes? It appears you believe the Lying Dotard.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by whell

So what's the bigger story? A president who enriched himself and his family by selling influence for millions of dollars to unsavory individuals, some with connections to - among other places - Moscow and Beijing?

Like tRump has?

Originally Posted by whell

Or 91 indictments using novel interpretations of the law to generate 91 indictments, in an effort headed up by a president who said he'd do whatever he could do to influence the 2024 election?

novel interpretations of the law

Wow, maybe this guy is hoping to become part of tRump's legal defense team. He's sure sounding like them. Or maybe he auditioning to be a MAGA politician or a standup comedian? Similar qualifications for both.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

So what's the bigger story? A president who enriched himself and his family by selling influence for millions of dollars to unsavory individuals, some with connections to - among other places - Moscow and Beijing? Or 91 indictments using novel interpretations of the law to generate 91 indictments, in an effort headed up by a president who said he'd do whatever he could to influence the 2024 election?

Go figure.

Oh, and nobody but you is questioning the provenance of the laptop. Even the NY Times stated they were able to verify the authenticity of the data. The FBI reportedly verified the contents back in 2019. Or are you still buying into the now-discredited "Russian disinformation" letter from dozens of former "intel officials"?

Provenance of the laptop is NY Post with Rudy's finger prints and hair dye on it. Keep this up and it will become a mythical object.

That's a new one on me, novel interpretation of the law!
Why are some if not all counts thrown out of court? It's a rhetorical question.
Poor Meadows, you should ask him how novel since he has already contested it.

Back to 91 indictments against your pissing in the wind. The very thought stinks.

[RickeyM]

91 criminal indictments?

Per the Reich-wing influencers (whell's) he's as pure and innocent as the driven snow because he hasn't been convicted.
(sure doesn't act innocent tho')

[Oerets]

Truth facts evidence even seen...witnessed firsthand matter little to those who are brainwashed by the lies put forth by their "trusted" sources. Those of unknown or unfounded unqualified yet sources they trust due to saying what they want to hear.

So, well this true with some here ...

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by Oerets

Truth facts evidence even seen...witnessed firsthand matter little to those who are brainwashed by the lies put forth by their "trusted" sources. Those of unknown or unfounded unqualified yet sources they trust due to saying what they want to hear.

So, well this true with some here ...

"the lies put forth by their "trusted" sources."

These lies are what they wish were true and this is how the brainwashing begins and morph into alternative facts and finally becomes the truth. So instead of Trump having committed multiple crimes with irrefutable proof, its the DOJ being weaponized against our favorite and always lovable Moron. Its good that most MAGAts do not go to college, it will be impossible to teach them anything at that level.

One way to wipe off the 91 indictments is to claim they are based on questionable law without addressing that these cases usually got tossed out of court if so, usually from the very first set of motions.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

So what's the bigger story? A president who enriched himself and his family by selling influence for millions of dollars to unsavory individuals, some with connections to - among other places - Moscow and Beijing? Or 91 indictments using novel interpretations of the law to generate 91 indictments, in an effort headed up by a president who said he'd do whatever he could to influence the 2024 election?

Go figure.

Oh, and nobody but you is questioning the provenance of the laptop. Even the NY Times stated they were able to verify the authenticity of the data. The FBI reportedly verified the contents back in 2019. Or are you still buying into the now-discredited "Russian disinformation" letter from dozens of former "intel officials"?

How about Trump attempting to purchase a Glock, or was that a joke too?

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Except for what you say is untrue. To wit:

The vast majority of the data - and most of the nearly 129,000 emails it contained - could not be verified by either of the two security experts who reviewed the data for The Post.

Among the reasons for the inconclusive findings was sloppy handling of the data, which damaged some records. The experts found the data had been repeatedly accessed and copied by people other than Hunter Biden over nearly three years.

Most of the data obtained by The Post lacks cryptographic features that would help experts make a reliable determination of authenticity, especially in a case where the original computer and its hard drive are not available for forensic examination.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/techn...data-examined/

In other words, the vast majority (if not all)
of the laptop contents cannot withstand legal scrutiny and show considerable evidence of tampering by multiple parties.

The Trump crimes, OTOH, happened right before your eyes. Who you gonna believe- Trump or your lying eyes? It appears you believe the Lying Dotard.

The NY Times and the FBI disagree with WaPo on this.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Amusing that you actually think your propaganda will work on anyone here. Most here are better read and far smarter than you. Give it up, you disgusting idiot.

Apparently not. Your posts are case studies of what folks like Kristen Welker can do to impressionable minds.