|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
09-11-2014, 08:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,737
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbara
I'm confused here....
Several posters state that the officer was shooting the victim as he was running away.
But.... Didn't the autopsy say that the bullet wounds entered from the front?
|
I think there are at least two theories that still have some followers even with the autopsy results-
One assumes the cop was shooting at, but failed to hit his target while he ran away. At some point, he turned around, perhaps to surrender, and was then shot repeatedly.
The other goes a bit further and attributes a grazing shot to the arm as having actually come from behind, and the autopsy got it wrong. Note that if your arm is down and you are shot from behind, the wound would rip from back to front. If your arm is up and you are advancing, again the wound would rip from back to front of the arm.
__________________
"You can't always get what you want" -Rolling Stones
|
09-11-2014, 08:14 PM
|
|
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,170
|
|
Several witness say Wilson shot at Brown as he was running away. If we accept that, the autopsies would indicate that he missed every time, except for one possible graze.
This shooting result is why I suggested that Brown would have been a lot better off to keep running, rather than stopping, turning around, and trying to surrender.
|
09-11-2014, 09:17 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,068
|
|
And still, the only video evidence of the events of that day is the store vid of Brown. Nobody put a cell cam on this event so no pix of the encounter.
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
|
09-11-2014, 09:23 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego via Vermilion Ohio and Points Between
Posts: 11,538
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pio1980
And still, the only video evidence of the events of that day is the store vid of Brown. Nobody put a cell cam on this event so no pix of the encounter.
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
|
The strong arm robbery has nothing to do with the shooting. The issue is whether Wilson shot an unarmed man with his hands raised in the air. A man who may have been surrendering.
__________________
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.
|
09-11-2014, 09:42 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,068
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by icenine
The strong arm robbery has nothing to do with the shooting. The issue is whether Wilson shot an unarmed man with his hands raised in the air. A man who may have been surrendering.
|
The events of the vid could certaunly have a bearing in Brown's reaction to the encounter and it's outcome. As I said it's the only video-corded evidence of the day's events, until something else comes forward.
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
|
09-11-2014, 10:06 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,172
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wasillaguy
I think there are at least two theories that still have some followers even with the autopsy results-
One assumes the cop was shooting at, but failed to hit his target while he ran away. At some point, he turned around, perhaps to surrender, and was then shot repeatedly.
The other goes a bit further and attributes a grazing shot to the arm as having actually come from behind, and the autopsy got it wrong. Note that if your arm is down and you are shot from behind, the wound would rip from back to front. If your arm is up and you are advancing, again the wound would rip from back to front of the arm.
|
Thank you for the clarification.
This might sound like a dumb question, but, how many bullets does the officer have in his gun? Can't they count the number of bullets used to determine if bullets were shot but missed hitting the victim? Or determine that every bullet used hit the victim?
|
09-11-2014, 10:24 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,737
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbara
Thank you for the clarification.
This might sound like a dumb question, but, how many bullets does the officer have in his gun? Can't they count the number of bullets used to determine if bullets were shot but missed hitting the victim? Or determine that every bullet used hit the victim?
|
Yes they can and certainly will account for every shot fired, and compare not only with wounds, but anywhere on the scene they can find evidence that a bullet struck.
__________________
"You can't always get what you want" -Rolling Stones
|
09-12-2014, 07:58 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbara
Thank you for the clarification.
This might sound like a dumb question, but, how many bullets does the officer have in his gun? Can't they count the number of bullets used to determine if bullets were shot but missed hitting the victim? Or determine that every bullet used hit the victim?
|
The gun Wilson used was a Sig Sauer automatic, 12 round magazine, 13 if a round is carried in the chamber. So they can certainly determine how many rounds were fired and they already know that 6 hit Michael Brown. I suspect regardless of what he reports, Wilson will be accused of lying about how many rounds were in his gun.
|
09-12-2014, 10:24 AM
|
|
Persona non grata
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 12,654
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana
The gun Wilson used was a Sig Sauer automatic, 12 round magazine, 13 if a round is carried in the chamber.
|
Do you know what model?
A 12 round magazine sounds more like a .40 than a 9mm.
__________________
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:29 AM.
|