|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
07-17-2012, 10:38 AM
|
|
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
|
|
Syria and Iran.
Something's happening, I keep picking up little hints and rumblings about troop movements into the area on international news and folks in the armed services...
NATO or UN into Syria, NATO into Iran?
Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
|
07-17-2012, 10:57 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 511
|
|
Somthing's going on in the Gulf. Heavy-duty minesweeping ops which would speak to the Iran piece. NATO probably there.
Fighting has reached Damascus which pretty much tells me that Assad's support is crumbling with slowly increasing rapidity. I think it's pretty much a given that if Assad sees it beginning to slip away he will go postal on the general populace. I don't think that's going to be allowed to happen. Could be UN but more likely a NATO operation. This would require a heavy NATO presence in the Gulf to deter direct Iranian involvement in Syria.
My 2 cents.
__________________
Butch
Extremist Moderate
|
07-17-2012, 11:02 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete
Something's happening, I keep picking up little hints and rumblings about troop movements into the area on international news and folks in the armed services...
NATO or UN into Syria, NATO into Iran?
Pete
|
What are you hearing, Pete.
The only thing I've heard in this regard concerns mine clearing operations in the Strait of Hormuz. That could be preparatory to military operations or simply for the safety of commercial (oil) shipping, notably from Iraq.
John
|
07-17-2012, 11:19 AM
|
|
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
|
|
I've got friends in the armed services being redeployed, Russia knuckling under the pressure, China shut-upped, unremembered things in France24 (comments not stories), and McLaughlin said we'll be fighting with Iran before the election.
This could all be brinkmanship. It's looking serious though.
Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
|
07-17-2012, 11:22 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 511
|
|
Is Kofi Annan still in Moscow, does anyone know?
__________________
Butch
Extremist Moderate
|
07-17-2012, 12:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beej
Is Kofi Annan still in Moscow, does anyone know?
|
Yes, or else he left earlier today. Apparently Russia has prepared a draft resolution calling for immediate implementation of the Annan Plan. Additionally, Foreign Minister Lavrov expressed optimism with regard to reaching an agreement in the Security Council.
My concern is that if Assad falls, as appears likely and as he should, the international community will have to move in there physically and micro-manage the transition. Doing anything else would certainly result in a country with a militant Islamist government, with strong al Qaeda and PFLP - General Command influence, sitting on Israel's eastern border. Israel would absolutely have to respond militarily to such an existential threat.
John
|
07-17-2012, 12:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
Yes, or else he left earlier today. Apparently Russia has prepared a draft resolution calling for immediate implementation of the Annan Plan. Additionally, Foreign Minister Lavrov expressed optimism with regard to reaching an agreement in the Security Council.
My concern is that if Assad falls, as appears likely and as he should, the international community will have to move in there physically and micro-manage the transition. Doing anything else would certainly result in a country with a militant Islamist government, with strong al Qaeda and PFLP - General Command influence, sitting on Israel's eastern border. Israel would absolutely have to respond militarily to such an existential threat.
John
|
Another scenario just occurred to me.
1. We could let the almost inevitably extremist government form itself in the wake of Assad's departure.
2. We then organize a strong international force in the Gulf and maybe even in Iraq to contain Iran.
3. We "green light" Israel to take out Syria.
4. At the first sign of a response from Iran we take them on as well.
This is exactly the sort of plan that PNAC would cream their jeans over.
John
|
07-17-2012, 01:23 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 511
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
Another scenario just occurred to me.
1. We could let the almost inevitably extremist government form itself in the wake of Assad's departure.
2. We then organize a strong international force in the Gulf and maybe even in Iraq to contain Iran.
3. We "green light" Israel to take out Syria.
4. At the first sign of a response from Iran we take them on as well.
This is exactly the sort of plan that PNAC would cream their jeans over.
John
|
Perhaps, but somehow I just don't see all of that falling into place without some extremist element somewhere doing something boneheaded that turns the region into powder keg. With respect to 'green lighting' Israel there are other players in the region who may not see that as optimal.
__________________
Butch
Extremist Moderate
|
07-17-2012, 01:34 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beej
Perhaps, but somehow I just don't see all of that falling into place without some extremist element somewhere doing something boneheaded that turns the region into powder keg. With respect to 'green lighting' Israel there are other players in the region who may not see that as optimal.
|
Yes, but you seem to be assuming that these people earned any lessons from the Iraq and Afghanistan misadventures.
We can also discuss how the other players in the area, particular the secular regimes like Bahrain and Qatar, would feel about having a militant Islamic state in their midst. They might also like to see an Israel weakened by a prolonged conflict.
Plus the NeoCons want Iran's oil.
John
|
07-17-2012, 01:36 PM
|
|
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,234
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beej
Perhaps, but somehow I just don't see all of that falling into place without some extremist element somewhere doing something boneheaded that turns the region into powder keg. With respect to 'green lighting' Israel there are other players in the region who may not see that as optimal.
|
Turkey?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 AM.
|