WARNING RE: Offensive posts

[djv8ga]

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

Yes he does and a main culprit of personal attacks

We should just ban all name calling that doesn't apply to politics. If you can't argue the facts without calling names to provoke and/or insult, than you need to go away.

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

Yes he does and a main culprit of personal attacks

Remedial reading needed as I did not mention any names in my post. However if the shoe fits ....

[BlueStreak]

Well, it has finally come to this.

We'll see if some people can get a rational point across without vitriol.

Good luck.

Dave

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by BlueStreak

Well, it has finally come to this.

We'll see if some people can get a rational point across without vitriol.

Good luck.

Dave

C'mon Dave. Politics without vitriol? I'd rather guzzle castor oil.

[djv8ga]

New post by Ike Bana under current events -
"Are you being deliberately obtuse or does it just come squirting out of you like shit from a goose? "

So is this offensive & provoking under the new rules? I find it VERY PROVOKING! I figure that I should be able to respond to this with all the hatred I want to if this is OK & not provoking under the new rules.

[HarmanKardon]

Originally Posted by djv8ga

New post by Ike Bana under current events -
"Are you being deliberately obtuse or does it just come squirting out of you like shit from a goose? "

So is this offensive & provoking under the new rules? I find it VERY PROVOKING! I figure that I should be able to respond to this with all the hatred I want to if this is OK & not provoking under the new rules.

(Ike that's a funny sentence, but... )

You hate Ike Bana? Is this really true? We should consider the use of the term "hatred" very carefully and try to be capable to avoid it generally as far as possible. But of course I respect your sentiment and I share your criticism of what Ike Bana said and it is actually an ugly violation of civility. We should try to express aversion on an other level of diction and eloquence.

[djv8ga]

Originally Posted by HarmanKardon

(Ike that's a funny sentence, but... )

You hate Ike Bana? Is this really true? We should consider the use of the term "hatred" very carefully and try to be capable to avoid it generally as far as possible. But of course I respect your sentiment and I share your criticism of what Ike Bana said and it is actually an ugly violation of civility. We should try to express aversion on an other level of diction and eloquence.

WTF? Look dude, If I rip that guy, many Leftys will refer to it as "Hate Speech" so I just roll with it.
The guy just can't be civil with anyone who disagrees with his politics & he provokes them every chance he gets.

[HarmanKardon]

Originally Posted by djv8ga

WTF? Look dude, If I rip that guy, many Leftys will refer to it as "Hate Speech" so I just roll with it.
The guy just can't be civil with anyone who disagrees with his politics & he provokes them every chance he gets.

Sorry, Sir, but the "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" principle is no sign of superiority.

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by djv8ga

New post by Ike Bana under current events -
"Are you being deliberately obtuse or does it just come squirting out of you like shit from a goose? "

So is this offensive & provoking under the new rules? I find it VERY PROVOKING! I figure that I should be able to respond to this with all the hatred I want to if this is OK & not provoking under the new rules.

And by make your lady wife responsible for saying I am "a sexist and pussy" you were all sweet innocence - DJ you are unbelieveable, are you really that thick?

[djv8ga]

Originally Posted by merrylander

And by make your lady wife responsible for saying I am "a sexist and pussy" you were all sweet innocence - DJ you are unbelieveable, are you really that thick?

Not the same and you know it. You made a comment generalizing women like they're cattle. My comment to you was how many women would respond to that 50's era statement you made. It was a legitimate response unlike that of Bana's.

You are sexist if that is your view of women...period.