Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
Yeh, that Bork who had no business with 100 miles of the SCOTUS. He supported the rights of Southern states to impose a poll tax and he had a stated goal of rolling back the civil rights decisions of the Warren and Burger courts. He was also criticized for being an "advocate of disproportionate powers for the executive branch of Government, almost executive supremacy," most notably, his role in the Saturday Night Massacre.
He lost 58-42 with 6 Republicans voting against him (6 Republican voting against him after knowing that the Dems already had the votes is a testimony to how out-of-the-mainstream this freak was). He is just the type of reactionary weirdo that today's GOP still favors.
|
What about the Dems who voted for him? And a moderate Repub - Gerald Ford - was asked to introduce him at the confirmation hearing, and called him "uniquely qualified".
I see that you're quite happy that the Dems started, and continue, to turn the SCOTUS nomination process into a circus, and an ideological inquisition.
Sorry, but its your friends the Dems who give us a nomination process where nominees are demonized just because they have a point of view differs from the hard left. And as the Dems have drifted further left, the process just gets worse.