Big Climate Change PAC Plans For '14 Races

[bobabode]

$100,000,000 Democratic political action group plans to spend big in the 2014 races regards to climate change. Watch out Chuck and Dave...

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/18/us...ment.html?_r=1

[finnbow]

He's pissing in the wind if China, India and Indonesia don't play along.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by finnbow

He's pissing in the wind if China, India and Indonesia don't play along.

True, it seems that the Chinese are ripe for some activism on this issue.


Kind of looks like the L.A. of my youth.

[djv8ga]

Originally Posted by finnbow

He's pissing in the wind if China,

They're more concerned with desertification than participating in American political B.S.
http://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2013/.../#.UwQP8bCYY5s

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by djv8ga

They're more concerned with desertification than participating in American political B.S.
http://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2013/.../#.UwQP8bCYY5s

I heard some pretty bright talking head (a guest on Fareed Zakaria's show, I think) refer to the fight against global warming as being a rich nation's fight. As long as a country's economies is suffering (including our own and Europe's), they'll have little interest in spending gobs of money on this issue when they have more pressing matters at hand. Developing nations have no interest whatsoever.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by djv8ga

They're more concerned with desertification than participating in American political B.S.
http://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2013/.../#.UwQP8bCYY5s

Is not desertification inextricably linked to rising temps? I agree that poor soil use practices area big factor too, fwiw but no water = desert no matter how good your soil use practices are.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desertification

[4-2-7]

Climate is and will be a non issue, your hearing pandering thats all.

[d-ray657]

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

Climate is and will be a non issue, your herring pandering thats all.

Why? On what do you base that analysis? Do you reject the scientific evidence? Do you conclude that the voters will be uninformed or apathetic?

And what the Hell is "herring pandering?"

Regards,

D-Ray

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

Why? On what do you base that analysis? Do you reject the scientific evidence? Do you conclude that the voters will be uninformed or apathetic?

And what the Hell is "herring pandering?"

Regards,

D-Ray

Another way of saying a "mackerel sucking-up."

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

Why? On what do you base that analysis? Do you reject the scientific evidence? Do you conclude that the voters will be uninformed or apathetic?

And what the Hell is "herring pandering?"

Regards,

D-Ray

Fox News said so.

Opinions and Analysis are entirely deferent.

I reject a lot of the evidence or so called evidence scientist present on this matter.

I don't think the voters will give a shit at least nothing significant to matter. Thats why I made the above comment.