Supply-Side Economics

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Sounds like your resume, minus the book smart part. I mean, how much learnin' does it take to be an HR flunky, after all.

Find yourself on the losing end of a debate, so you attack me. Brilliant strategy.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

So, is it possible for you to stay on topic, or do you want to continue to retreat into the world of false equivalence when you get in trouble.

Irony must be dead.

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by whell

Find yourself on the losing end of a debate, so you attack me. Brilliant strategy.

Your idea of “winning” matches Donny’s. You must be tired of all your “winning”.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Your idea of “winning” matches Donny’s. You must be tired of all your “winning”.

Whell actually thinks he won a debate over the merits of supply-side economics??? He's as delusional as his Dear Dotard.

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Whell actually thinks he won a debate over the merits of supply-side economics??? He's as delusional as his Dear Dotard.

Didn't say that, did I Finn? Another time-honored tactic of yours...

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Your idea of “winning” matches Donny’s. You must be tired of all your “winning”.

Not at all. Do you get tired of your own BS?

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by whell

Not at all. Do you get tired of your own BS?

You never fail to provide a great morning chuckle! Sometimes i burst out laughing! Thanks, keep ‘em coming!

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

Didn't say that, did I Finn? Another time-honored tactic of yours...

OK, if you have beaten Chicks in a debate in a supply-side economics thread (in which you have berated others for getting off the supply-side topic), please enlighten us about your winning argument. It would be your first win ever and a reason for you to celebrate.

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

OK, if you have beaten Chicks in a debate in a supply-side economics thread (in which you have berated others for getting off the supply-side topic), please enlighten us about your winning argument. It would be your first win ever and a reason for you to celebrate.

Reading without comprehension again, Finn? My recent exchange with Chickie was specifically about Larry Summers, not specifically about supply - side (though I did note that Summers, who Chickie injected into the discussion with his post, was on record of favoring Reagan's tax policies over Trump's).

The fact that I even have to explain this to you should embarrass you, but you'll probably just find a way to blame Trump for your lack of comprehension.

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by whell

My recent exchange with Chickie was specifically about Larry Summers

So your idea of “winning” is grabbing a few quotes from a hatchet piece on a highly respected economist. You really should go work for the current administration, you’d fit right in.