Durham's Investigations Fizzles

[finnbow]

From the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (chaired by Richard Burr (R-NC) report. In a nutshell, what's true in the Durham report isn't new; and what's new isn't true.

[Chicks]

Trump couldn't possibly be a Russian asset...could he?
https://www.rawstory.com/amp/trump-r...set-2660287253

[Chicks]

Jonathan Turley Bills Durham Report A Success 'Despite A Lack Of Evidence' Which Is The Most Jonathan Turley Sentence Ever
And I commend the Eagles on their Super Bowl championship despite a lack of points.

https://abovethelaw.com/2023/05/jona...k-of-evidence/

Remind anyone of a not-too-bright member here?

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Jonathan Turley Bills Durham Report A Success 'Despite A Lack Of Evidence' Which Is The Most Jonathan Turley Sentence Ever
And I commend the Eagles on their Super Bowl championship despite a lack of points.

https://abovethelaw.com/2023/05/jona...k-of-evidence/

Remind anyone of a not-too-bright member here?

Leave it to you to celebrate an article where the author takes one sentence from Turley's blog, quotes it completely out of context, and then writes an opinion/hit piece about Turley based on that single sentence. Its funny that the author provides a link to Turley's blog post WAY at the bottom of the page like he's trying to hide it. A journalistic best practice, if you're going to quote from a source on the internet, is to provide the link adjacent to or within the quote.

Well done, lefty butt-boy.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

Leave it to you to celebrate an article where the author takes one sentence from Turley's blog, quotes it completely out of context, and then writes an opinion/hit piece about Turley based on that single sentence. Its funny that the author provides a link to Turley's blog post WAY at the bottom of the page like he's trying to hide it. A journalistic best practice, if you're going to quote from a source on the internet, is to provide the link adjacent to or within the quote.

Well done, lefty butt-boy.

"Lefty butt boy"? Coming out of the closet, are we? Do your wife and kids know?

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

Leave it to you to celebrate an article where the author takes one sentence from Turley's blog, quotes it completely out of context, and then writes an opinion/hit piece about Turley based on that single sentence. Its funny that the author provides a link to Turley's blog post WAY at the bottom of the page like he's trying to hide it. A journalistic best practice, if you're going to quote from a source on the internet, is to provide the link adjacent to or within the quote.

Well done, lefty butt-boy.

The bottom line is that you (and Turley) will seek any deflection not to discuss what we know to be true about actual coordination/communication between the Trump campaign and Russia, Trump's reaction to (and willingness to accept) known assistance by Russia, Trump's subsequent obstruction of justice efforts and the multiple indictments/convictions/pleas of Trump staff & cronies secured by Mueller.

Better to spin up and create confusion around the FBI/DOJ where the only proven malfeasance in this case was the Carter Page FISA warrant (long since adjudicated) which played zero role in the initiation of the investigation.

The emotional energy that you have wrapped up in trying to convince yourself and others that Trump, a known fraud, is squeaky clean in an affair in which he is not squeaky clean is truly a sight to behold. No matter. He's been indicted for other felonies and more indictments are likely soon. You need to accept that he's a malignant narcissist, pathological liar and fraud and move on, son.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Jonathan Turley Bills Durham Report A Success 'Despite A Lack Of Evidence' Which Is The Most Jonathan Turley Sentence Ever
And I commend the Eagles on their Super Bowl championship despite a lack of points.

https://abovethelaw.com/2023/05/jona...k-of-evidence/

Remind anyone of a not-too-bright member here?

To these MAGAMorons, a complete lack of evidence is proof of a diabolical cover-up of the "crime of the century."

[donquixote99]

We don't need no steenkin evidence....

[whell]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

We don't need no steenkin evidence....

Apparently, that holds true for you, other folks here, and the FBI folks who participated in Crossfire Hurricane.

[RickeyM]

You know what they say. "Garbage in - garbage out".