Supremes vote for religious bigotry

[bhunter]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Keeping in mind that Hobby Lobby's customer base is largely women, it will be interesting to see whether America's women will now shop elsewhere.

Do you really think that the number of women effected by the narrow decision is significant? IMHO most women are smart enough to understand the decision and skip the political meanderings by the democrat's to rev up their base.

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by bhunter

Do you really think that the number of women effected by the narrow decision is significant? IMHO most women are smart enough to understand the decision and skip the political meanderings by the democrat's to rev up their base.

Well now that the camel's nose is in the tent we will just have to wait and see, won't we?

After all it only affects a few women and women are not anyone whose rights we should consider.

We really need to do universal healthcare and all of this crap would be moot. Instead ACA simply continues the diseasecare we currently have in place.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by bhunter

Do you really think that the number of women effected by the narrow decision is significant? IMHO most women are smart enough to understand the decision and skip the political meanderings by the democrat's to rev up their base.

Do you really think the number of gunowners affected by an assault weapon ban would be significant?

IMHO the only civilians that would want to own an assault rifle are pea brained knuckle dragging psychopaths like the Yayhoo in this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkavwuWE5eQ

Seriously Dude, at the very mention of any kind of proposed gun control, no matter how minor and unobtrusive it may be, you right wingers start screaming your tits off about how Obama is going to take away your guns. As long as you are doing that kind of shit, you don't get to use the old "it's not a big deal" argument.

[bhunter]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

Do you really think the number of gunowners affected by an assault weapon ban would be significant?

IMHO the only civilians that would want to own an assault rifle are pea brained knuckle dragging psychopaths like the Yayhoo in this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkavwuWE5eQ

Non sequitur. There isn't a readily available remedy for an assault weapons ban like there is here for the proscribed methods of birth control.

[icenine]

Originally Posted by bhunter

Do you really think that the number of women effected by the narrow decision is significant? IMHO most women are smart enough to understand the decision and skip the political meanderings by the democrat's to rev up their base.

You are sort of ignorant about demographics and the role single women play in running households. Birth control access is an important economic consideration for career women.

[bhunter]

Originally Posted by icenine

You are sort of ignorant about demographics and the role single women play in running households. Birth control access is an important economic consideration for career women.

No I'm not. I think women are capable of making their own decisions and don't need the god-damn state telling them they're weak and need help. Speaking of which: Do you think democrats prefer single women households or married households given the demographics over the last, say, 50 years?

[djv8ga]

Originally Posted by bhunter

No I'm not. I think women are capable of making their own decisions and don't need the god-damn state telling them they're weak and need help. Speaking of which: Do you think democrats prefer single women households or married households given the demographics over the last, say, 50 years?

Dude, what's up with you? Democrat women are too damn ugly to need birth control.

[whell]

Originally Posted by djv8ga

Dude, what's up with you? Democrat women are too damn ugly to need birth control.

Your statement, of course, is in jest an not universally true. Many liberal women just unfortunately spring ugly parents. Take Chelsea Clinton. Its not her fault that Howdy Doody was cosmetically challenged.

[djv8ga]

Originally Posted by whell

Your statement, of course, is in jest an not universally true. Many liberal women just unfortunately spring ugly parents. Take Chelsea Clinton. Its not her fault that Howdy Doody was cosmetically challenged.

Point taken.
Rosie is looking better though.

[d-ray657]

Originally Posted by whell

Your statement, of course, is in jest an not universally true. Many liberal women just unfortunately spring ugly parents. Take Chelsea Clinton. Its not her fault that Howdy Doody was cosmetically challenged.

I just can't imagine why anyone would think that the Republican Party is populated with misogynists.

And how do women spring parents?