Quote:
Originally Posted by BeamOn
Here is an opposing view.
Earlier today the Times of Israel published the article “When Genocide is Permissible” by Yochanan Gordon. They have since taken it down but we are republishing it here as representative of part of the discourse in the American Jewish community. According to Gordon’s bio at the Times of Israel his father is the founder of The Five Towns Jewish Times in Nassau County, NY which is “committed to showing the best of our Orthodox Jewish community, while reflecting reality.” The article is still posted there.
http://mondoweiss.net/2014/08/yochan...rmissible.html
|
Gordon's argument is based on premises widely believed and shared by Israelis and their apologists. These include, quoting Gordon's piece:
1. "We are at war with an enemy whose charter calls for the annihilation of our people."
2. "...falsehood and deceit is part of the very fabric of who they [Gazans] are and that will never change."
3. "...anyone who lives with rocket launchers installed or terror tunnels burrowed in or around the vicinity of their home cannot be considered an innocent civilian."
This aim of Hamas claimed in point 1. is taken as absolute, unalterable, and unquestionable. It likewise is treated as an immediate threat, despite Hamas's utter inability to carry out such an aim. The ideas that Hamas might have other aims as well, that such other aims might conflict with the annihilation aim and mitigate it, that the individuals who are collectively called Hamas all have individual motivations and values that all vary, or that such aims might vary under varying times and circumstances, are all rejected.
The reason for the rejection of all question of the annihilation aim, and much else, can be seen in point 2. It is believed that the Gazan enemy is unlike other human beings. While most people are only dishonest sometimes and can indeed change, the Gazans are believed to be unalterably corrupt in their nature. So anything said by Gazans can be disregarded, if it conflicts with one's own beliefs. One may assume they are lying. Likewise, it is obviously useless to negotiate with them in any sense, since they will lie and they will not change. Point 2. asserts nothing less than the belief that the Gazans are not really human, but a special, evil breed of humanoid, unlike one's own acquaintances or any other group of people on the planet.
Point 3. is the collective guilt belief, and it follows easily from points one and two. First of all, all Gazans are guilty of thoughtcrime, since they all believe in the annihilation aim and are all corrupt in their nature. But further, any Gazan who by some inconceivable chance escapes guilt on the first counts is still guilty, since it is their individual responsibility to stop the armed forces of Hamas from carrying out operations in their vicinity.
That the three points are bigoted claptrap is self-evident. But if one does believe them, they logically and immediately lead to when Gordon goes--to justification of genocide. And while most apologists for the Gazan Punitive Expedition shrink back from stating this conclusion explicitly and boldly, most will indeed, explicitly, make arguments equivalent to the three points.