Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-02-2012, 02:02 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by mezz View Post
That will be a matter of dimwits getting what they deserve, nothing more.
And you becoming more and more bitter - and delusional.
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-02-2012, 02:04 PM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
Not according to Uncle Joe.

“Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”

John
Excellent!

Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-05-2012, 07:32 AM
mezz mezz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 543
More fun with polls.

The RCP electoral college shows all battleground states and the percentage of people who responded either Obama or Romney. The interesting number (and the one left out in determining RCPs electoral college map) is the percentage who have not responded either way. If these are to be taken as undecideds (who will actually turn out to vote - a problem assumption, but an assumption which may even out given that a good portion of those those who chose a candidate in the opinion polls will not turn out to vote either - and if Obama's got an enthusiasm gap here than this is more bad news for him).

So looking at undecideds in any state where the total respondents who chose a candidate did not put either candidate over 50% we can apply the 'undecided's rule' and assume that 82% of undecideds this late in the game will break for the challenger.

That gives us an electoral college map with Ohio, New Hampshire, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Iowa too close to call and puts Oregon into leaning Romney.

Thus, the electoral total with toss-ups: Obama= 210, Romney=264. If we create a no toss-up map we get: Obama=264, Romney=274 (Romney wins without Ohio or Pennsylvania).
__________________
Liberalism: Find a cure.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-05-2012, 12:14 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is online now
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,234
Don't y'all just love the home schooled?...
__________________
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
- Mr. Underhill
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.