From the link in Post 244, these comments are worrisome.
Quote:
“There’s stuff missing and not there. It shows there’s at least a certain amount of sloppiness,” said Bill Allison of the Sunlight Foundation, a government transparency advocacy group.
“The surprise here is knowing all the close attention all of this was going to get . . . why wasn’t there more sensitivity from the Clintons to say ‘OK, sit down and show me you’re doing this right,’ knowing from a political perspective there’s going to be vulnerability?” said McGehee. “There’s a certain hubris here.”
|
IMO, there seems to be a certain amount of arrogance on Hillary's part that looks like she believes that she is preordained to be the next President, same as Romney must have felt when he ran in 2012.
I don't believe that the Clinton's benefited monetarily other than income derived from some of his speaking engagements that could be seen as power brokering. This happens all the time anyway so to single out the Clinton's will be a non-starter. But sloppy housekeeping? That's fodder for digging and it has just begun.